RE: D/S versus Passive/Aggressive (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


CERCKL -> RE: D/S versus Passive/Aggressive (4/18/2006 10:41:14 PM)

quote:

You're exactly right- taking time outs can be extremely useful tools of communication, taking time to take perspective is an excellent idea.

But that's not usually what's going on- it's usually the dom just having a pout-fest, training the sub not to push the buttons he doesn't want to or is incapable of actually dealing with and couching it in a "It's my way so it's the right way and you're the sub so deal and accept" deal.

Ultimately, it always crumbles. But it can go for a loooong time before then



Oh absolutely as long as the situation was addressed! If I knew that it was the (hypothetical) 'his' style to handle things that way, then yes- I could very well understand. I was only referring to the scenerios where the problem was just scooped under the rug and never dealt with. That is probably one of the only lasting screwed-up things about my childhood that haunts me to this day ... my mother never wanting to deal with crap so she refused to discuss it .... EVER. So, that is why I said I would shut down, but only in the case that it wasnt talked about later.


OK, so screwing with putting in multiple quotes again...I think it's the difference between Mozilla and IE...oh well.
I wanted to deal with both LA and enthralled's thoughts though. I do agree that a lot of Dom's might end up 'puting' as stated and get into a My Way Sinatra trip...it's a lot easier this way. Obey. Period. This very well may work in certain dynamics...that's great. All I can do though is refer to myself and my personal experience...to me communication is very much a cornerstone of any relationship...even play; as in here too is a relationship, an interaction, even if the roles are decided and there is no communication before or after play, this should have been reached by mutual consent, hence communication...
With what I perceive being addressed in my being responded to, I was speaking more of a 'relationship' and issues need to be addresses...I am still in the process of emerging from the end of a relationship where communication was never satisfactorily reached; all were miserable, always second guessing, finally never addressing...then you end up with a very large elephant standing in the hallway which you need to walk around but nobody is willing to admit lives there.
I have found that if highly (negatively) charged issues are dealt with through 'fighting' then things are said more in a spirit of harming than being constructive.
At this time I am in the process of building a relationship with lotus, and this means a lot to me...there is a lot of previous harm to deal with, on both sides; a lot of dealing with instinctive defenses being placed. and expectations that I will be like the 'others' (Goddam, I loathe being compared to anyone else...) This is a (painfully) slow process attempting to emerge from a very sudden and intense situation...plus my own natural intensity doesn't do much to calm the situation. This is also a very overtly D/s framed relationship; nonetheless, being the 'D' part...I still find it needed not only to listen to her concerns, fears, doubts, needs but to try to access them, process them and to recognize which aspects she needs to conquer on her own and which areas I can help guide her through or just be supportive in. There has been more discussion, examination, processing in the last five weeks with lotus than I experienced during my previous relationship of over twelve years...and to be honest, it has been quite exhausting for both of us...but with out it, it's back to what enthralled referred to and it would never be dealt with...and I would be back to an elephant in my hallway again.
....then again, I'm not a 'real' Dom, so ignore this post <g>.

C




Darke -> RE: D/S versus Passive/Aggressive (4/18/2006 10:44:23 PM)

One of the most appealing aspects of the lifestyle is, to Me, to ability and freedom to be completely honest with My partner. If I want more blowjobs, I won't quietly, resentfully sulk each night she doesn't think to offer one like the poor people trapped in a vanilla relationship-- I will simply say "Suck my Cock now." So freeing, the lack of missed signals and the resentment they bring.

If My partner does something I don't like, I will say "I dislike when you do that--tell Me the reasons why you feel the need to do 'x'" Based on her response, I will either say "Alright, I understand" or "I dislike X--moving forward you will no longer do it" or "I dislike X--moving forward you wil no longer do it, lest there be Y consequence" or "I understand your reason--this will be our strategy to get you to cease the behavior: there will be Y consequence, and/or you will do Z instead to sublimate, and/or you will be forced to do X for A timeframe until you can't stand it anymore."

Isn't that why people identify as Doms in the first place--because they are hands-on, want to be upfront about their needs and have them met without all the unclarity and frustration that a pedestran modesty brings?


Honesty: It's My anti-brat




ImpGrrl -> RE: D/S versus Passive/Aggressive (4/22/2006 1:02:56 PM)

It's not P/A if you tell them that it's the consequences of your action.

However, it *is* P/A if it's done without explanation.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Proprietrix

quote:

ORIGINAL: OedipusRexIt
What are anyone's thoughts regarding aspects of passive/aggressive behabvior, petulance, vindictiveness or transference of anger as exhibited by their Dom/Dommes?
I have read a number of posts in which something to the effect of "master punished me by not calling" or "master made me jump through these hoops, then left me with nothing..", etc.  While we all have a right to our own pursuit of our preferences, it strikes me as odd that pettiness masqueraded as Dominance, and I feel it gives a lot of Us a bad name.


hmmm,
I think some of your examples aren't directly related to the characteristics.
As a Domme, I've enforced "no contact" or "ignore" punishments with subs. "You did something that offended me/disrespected me, therefore you do not have the privilege of my attention for 48 hours."
I let them email me and leave messages on the answering machine, but I don't respond at all until the 48 hours is over. Or if they live with me, I won't make eye contact or speak to them for X period of time, but they can sit there and talk to me all they want.
I wouldn't call that passive-agressive or vindictive. It's simply a no-contact order for a certain period of time so said submissive can reflect on their behavior.
Maybe if I had different examples to go on...





Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
1.660156E-02