RE: James Webb: Diversity and the Myth of White Privilege (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message

willbeurdaddy -> RE: James Webb: Diversity and the Myth of White Privilege (7/24/2010 9:54:03 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

Here is a link, Note number 3

http://www.lawmemo.com/101/2005/12/discharge_in_vi_1.html


If its the same number 3 it is totally irrelevant. DUCY?



Jeffff -> RE: James Webb: Diversity and the Myth of White Privilege (7/24/2010 9:55:26 AM)

Why?



willbeurdaddy -> RE: James Webb: Diversity and the Myth of White Privilege (7/24/2010 9:58:16 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

Why?


Because though worded poorly, the examples make clear it is referring to rights granted to people based on their status as an employee, not rights otherwise granted to people who happen to be employees.



3 - exercised a right that the law gives to employees. Examples: (a) Filing a claim for worker compensation. (b) Filing a court complaint against the employer.



truckinslave -> RE: James Webb: Diversity and the Myth of White Privilege (7/24/2010 10:01:10 AM)

quote:

There is no doubt in my mind that truckinslave would not hire someone or fire a person due to their race


That accusation is both incorrect and baseless.



Jeffff -> RE: James Webb: Diversity and the Myth of White Privilege (7/24/2010 10:02:05 AM)

It's form a site called law 101

3 - exercised a right that the law gives to employees

The law give anyone, including employees the right to vote.

One can not be fired for voting.

You may feel free to continue to show what an asshole you are.

I am enjoying it.



thornhappy -> RE: James Webb: Diversity and the Myth of White Privilege (7/24/2010 10:07:36 AM)

Nope, it's a mixed crew.  Most are American, one's European, and one's from India.
quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead


quote:

ORIGINAL: thornhappy

I've always given a jaundiced eye to the "unqualified minority" line.  I've known shitloads of unqualified white guys.

And your Doctor's probably from somewhere in Asia.



xBullx -> RE: James Webb: Diversity and the Myth of White Privilege (7/24/2010 10:08:30 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: domiguy

What they are designed to do is end one set of racist conditions. perhaps they are racist in their wording or their implementation.

I can live with it.



I have a question with the comment that has been highlighted.

Is this an admission that selective racism is OK?



Moonhead -> RE: James Webb: Diversity and the Myth of White Privilege (7/24/2010 10:11:01 AM)

Fair enough. I'd thought you had the same thing in the 'States as we have here, where a lot of people working in hospitals are coming in from elsewhere as the number of domestic undergraduates taking medical degrees has dropped in the last couple of decades.



thornhappy -> RE: James Webb: Diversity and the Myth of White Privilege (7/24/2010 10:13:22 AM)

* snort *

(that was one of them "bust out laughing" snorts!)  I only look mean when I have a headache for a week...and you'll never guess how long I had this headache!
quote:

ORIGINAL: EbonyWood

quote:

ORIGINAL: thornhappy

I've always given a jaundiced eye to the "unqualified minority" line.  I've known shitloads of unqualified white guys.


I so want to post "Sexually?" to this.
 
But thorny looks mean.



Jeffff -> RE: James Webb: Diversity and the Myth of White Privilege (7/24/2010 10:13:28 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

quote:

There is no doubt in my mind that truckinslave would not hire someone or fire a person due to their race


That accusation is both incorrect and baseless.



You're kidding right? You might want to look up the definition of "baseless"



Jeffff -> RE: James Webb: Diversity and the Myth of White Privilege (7/24/2010 10:22:45 AM)

Here you go truckin.


here's the west virginia statute criminalizing it
: ยง3-9-20. Obstructing employees' freedom to vote; penalties.
Any corporation violating any provision of section forty-two of article one of this chapter or preventing or attempting to prevent any voter in its employ from attending any election, or from freely exercising his right of suffrage, at any election, at which he is entitled to vote, by any threat, direct or indirect, express or implied, to discharge such voter or deprive him of his employment, or shall discharge such voter or deprive him of his employment because of any vote he may cast, or refuse to cast, at any election at which he is entitled to vote, under the provisions of this chapter, shall, in each instance, be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, on conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than one thousand dollars. /www.legis.state.wv.us




TheHeretic -> RE: James Webb: Diversity and the Myth of White Privilege (7/24/2010 10:32:29 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff
shall be fined not more than one thousand dollars.



Just a hunch, but I think the civil jury might go a bit higher than that...



Jeffff -> RE: James Webb: Diversity and the Myth of White Privilege (7/24/2010 10:37:11 AM)

Probably, I can't believe it had to be proven to him.




willbeurdaddy -> RE: James Webb: Diversity and the Myth of White Privilege (7/24/2010 10:39:00 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

It's form a site called law 101

3 - exercised a right that the law gives to employees

The law give anyone, including employees the right to vote.

One can not be fired for voting.

You may feel free to continue to show what an asshole you are.

I am enjoying it.


Not my fault you dont know how to read legalese. It is referring only to rights granted as a result of being an employee. period.

And your post is prima facie evidence of who the asshole is.



willbeurdaddy -> RE: James Webb: Diversity and the Myth of White Privilege (7/24/2010 10:40:45 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: xBullx

quote:

ORIGINAL: domiguy

What they are designed to do is end one set of racist conditions. perhaps they are racist in their wording or their implementation.

I can live with it.



I have a question with the comment that has been highlighted.

Is this an admission that selective racism is OK?



Of course it is. That is the only possible justification for what is discriminatory on its face.



xBullx -> RE: James Webb: Diversity and the Myth of White Privilege (7/24/2010 10:41:59 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

Does it settle the fact we have a bunch of old white men screaming racism?

Because apparently white men have faced a lifetime of discrimination by the black oppressors.



You are aware that these "old white men" aren't going to change their collective, or individual minds simply because the government legislates it, right?

Most legislation that we presently have and the way it's written inspires resistance to the very subject matter its intended to address. No one, white, black or any pigment likes to be forced to accept anything.

You know what changes my mind about a man (gender neutral)? He does, his actions, ability and the legacy that he himself inspires. Kind of like Martain Luther King Junior said, judge a man on his character, not the color of his skin(paraphrased).

I don't know the answer for this racist thing for other men, I can only speak for myself. I work with any man or woman that can fit the bill. It's obvious that the present laws do as much to promote strife as they do to combat it. So we need to collectively put much more thought into the psychology of this issue, from all sides.

I suggest we work and consider other methods to inspire social balance, what I see now in society is the same thing I see on these boards with regard to the wingers, neither side is after a harmonious conclusion, they seek the upper hand or the ability to determine the social and power-broker answers that others must accept.

This can't be a political issue if we really want it to addressed at it's core, it has to be an issue of compassion and conscience on all sides; give and take must be experienced by all sides involved. Until then it's just an issue for the politicians to use in order to gain voter support. And considering it's a useful tool for them, do any of you really think they want to solve the problem?



Jeffff -> RE: James Webb: Diversity and the Myth of White Privilege (7/24/2010 10:43:37 AM)

Hey will? I just want you to know, I find you amusing so I am not going to block you.

I am going to stop responding though.




xBullx -> RE: James Webb: Diversity and the Myth of White Privilege (7/24/2010 10:44:51 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: xBullx

quote:

ORIGINAL: domiguy

What they are designed to do is end one set of racist conditions. perhaps they are racist in their wording or their implementation.

I can live with it.



I have a question with the comment that has been highlighted.

Is this an admission that selective racism is OK?



Of course it is. That is the only possible justification for what is discriminatory on its face.



Thanks for you answer Willbeurdaddy, but I would really like DG to answer for himself, if he would.



willbeurdaddy -> RE: James Webb: Diversity and the Myth of White Privilege (7/24/2010 10:45:10 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

Hey will? I just want you to know, I find you amusing so I am not going to block you.

I am going to stop responding though.




Cool, it will save a lot of the garbage you spew from further contaminating this cesspool.



domiguy -> RE: James Webb: Diversity and the Myth of White Privilege (7/24/2010 11:18:25 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

quote:

There is no doubt in my mind that truckinslave would not hire someone or fire a person due to their race


That accusation is both incorrect and baseless.


If you would fire someone or not hire them due to their political affiliations I have no doubt that you would discriminate based upon race.

What if they mentioned the NAACP? God forbid.


You are a hypocrite. Who obviously cannot stand to be around anyone that might possibly question your views....why else for the firing?

it makes you look rather weak and pathetic.



Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875