laurell3
Posts: 6577
Joined: 5/5/2005 Status: offline
|
You're missing the point. Just FYI the federal law under intimidating someone or infringing with their right to vote makes this employer's actions arguably a felony. But that's not a contract issue (although I sure wouldn't want to be them): Section 11 (b) of the 1965 Voting Rights Act as amended 43 U.S.C. Section 1971(b) provides: No person, whether acting under color of law or otherwise, shall intimidate, threaten, coerce, or attempt to intimidate, threaten, or coerce any other person for the purpose of interfering with the right of such other person to vote or to vote as he may choose, or of causing such other person to vote for, or not to vote for, any candidate for the office of President, Vice President, presidential elector, Member of the Senate, or Member of the House of Representatives, Delegates or Commissioners from the Territories or possessions, at any general, special, or primary election held solely or in part for the purpose of selecting or electing any such candidate. With regard to the contract issue. The employment law says, even at will employees can be considered to have a contract with basic provisions excluding termination for public policy reasons when a state exercises their right to recognize a public policy exception. (and no I cannot cite it today without paying for it, which I won't do...maybe later in the week I can for free if I bother a friend to pull it up). This state has in fact exercised that right with their statute criminalizing the behavior. Thus, although yes generally no contract exists, here, one has been created by the state right. It isn't really as simple as just saying is there a statute. The law does not work that way in the vast majority of civil cases.
_____________________________
I cannot be defined by moments in my life, but must be considered for by the entirety of my existence. When you fail to consider that I am the best judge for what is right for me, all of your opinions become suspect to me.
|