MissCake
Posts: 149
Joined: 9/18/2008 Status: offline
|
Yeah, um, pretty much none of that is correct, but you get a gold star for effort and extra credit for not just ignoring the thread in the first place. One) No, they never did. Two) Yes, but not near San Onofre's Trail 6 which remains incredibly secluded by the fact that it is just south of a large nuclear power plant and abuts the Marine base. The area remains remarkably unchanged since the Marine Base gave the land to the State. Three) That has not been their stated reasoning in this particular case. Four) That's entirely open to interpretation. No member of the NAC has ever actually whined in my presence, and the only butthurt I have seen is sunburn. Five) The park rangers began by posting signs, circulating flyers, and threatening to issue citations. The NAC and other beachgoers felt it necessary to seek a court injunction after informal talks with the park personnel yielded no compromise, as is our right, of course, as Americans. State agencies can't actually just do whatever they want. Six) Yep. That's how court works. Seven) If by "go through proper channels" you mean, have a public hearing before a major policy change, yeah, one court said they broke protocol, and the next court said they didn't - also how court works. Eight) It isn't actually against the law - that's the point. But sometimes laws don't reflect fairness, justice, constitutionality...and it takes people to challenge those laws. Nine) I think they have much better things to do than ticket beach goers - and they haven't substantiated the claims of public complaint. But here's the kicker, if "public complaint" is sufficient for them to change 30 odd years of precedent, then why can't the public be heard by the State Parks in support of a policy change that would allow continued and legal use of the beach by naturists? Ten) Nope, still really really secluded. You have to hike there on foot - sorry - I haven't measured the distance of the hike, but it's over a mile, and the beach is only visible from the water, by Marine Helicopter or by using binoculars from the high cliffs (high cliffs which aren't accessible to the public). Eleven) Yep, we do the patriotic thing by engaging in our political process, directly, actively. We're not asking to be allowed to remain in a home we failed to pay for. This is a home we did and do pay for, as the public. We are asking for creation of solid policies and regulations which allow us to use this part of our home in a way that doesn't infringe on the rights of others, without the fear of arrest or fines. That's pretty much why I think it's an issue a lot of kinksters and BDSM folk might have an interest in. Nine)
|