Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Adding new search criteria?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity >> Adding new search criteria? Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
[Poll]

Adding new search criteria?


I want Pro-Dommes segrigated from Lifestyle Dommes.
  21% (10)
I really don't think anything needs to change, my search is going well
  21% (10)
I don't use the search feature and don't care
  8% (4)
I don't want one more citeria to have to fill out
  10% (5)
I think other search criteria should be added too!
  10% (5)
I think this is a dumb ass poll, but have fun!
  6% (3)
What's it matter? Nothing is going to change.
  21% (10)


Total Votes : 47


(last vote on : 12/15/2010 10:10:40 AM)
(Poll will run till: -- )
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Adding new search criteria? - 8/3/2010 4:31:14 PM   
BoiJen


Posts: 2608
Joined: 3/7/2007
Status: offline
Let's roll with it and see what happens.

_____________________________


Clips of MsKitty doin' stuff to me. Support the fan club, buy a clip today.
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Adding new search criteria? - 8/3/2010 4:53:12 PM   
dbloomer


Posts: 137
Joined: 7/9/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoiJen

Let's roll with it and see what happens.


I'm curious about your choice to include 6 ways to say "no" and only 1 way to say "yes".

(in reply to BoiJen)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Adding new search criteria? - 8/3/2010 4:54:16 PM   
BoiJen


Posts: 2608
Joined: 3/7/2007
Status: offline
actually, one of the options is "I think other search criteria should be added too!" Try not to be so narrow.

_____________________________


Clips of MsKitty doin' stuff to me. Support the fan club, buy a clip today.

(in reply to dbloomer)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Adding new search criteria? - 8/3/2010 4:55:31 PM   
lizi


Posts: 4673
Joined: 2/1/2009
Status: offline
Meh, doesn't matter to me if it's added or not. I think if it were added the only change would be that instead of people coming to the boards to complain about the lack of a pro category, they'll complain about why don't the pros use the pro category. It won't actually cut down on the total amount of whining by those who are disgruntled in their search.

The results of this poll will most likely be skewed anyway if those voting in favor of one option or another have many sockpuppet profiles to register multiple votes for the same person.

(in reply to BoiJen)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Adding new search criteria? - 8/3/2010 5:00:21 PM   
SylvereApLeanan


Posts: 8275
Joined: 11/1/2007
From: Hell
Status: offline
Hell, yeah.  While you're about it, add a RELATIONSHIP checkbox so I can automatically eliminate those who are already in one from searches. 

_____________________________

Sylverë
Dark Muse
30 Fluffy Points
Grumpy Cat is my spirit animal.
Shadow Governess & Mean Girl
"There's something that doesn't make sense. Let's go and poke it with a stick."— The Doctor

(in reply to lizi)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Adding new search criteria? - 8/3/2010 5:21:50 PM   
pogo4pres


Posts: 593
Joined: 1/14/2007
Status: offline
I seem to recall this topic being done in a different thread, and the OP getting berated badly, not that it was not deserved.   Every kink site on the net has both pro & lifestyle Domme's on them, it isn't going to change unless we can change every culture of the world to allow men to be openly submissive, (like THAT will ever happen), and even were it to happen I doubt the "need" for "professional domination"  would end.  

Just my opinion, I could be wrong.

(in reply to SylvereApLeanan)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Adding new search criteria? - 8/3/2010 5:22:10 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
While most folks know My opinion from the other thread, My vote was not wanting more criteria to fill out.

_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to SylvereApLeanan)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Adding new search criteria? - 8/3/2010 7:01:11 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline
I rarely read profiles or even look at them.  About the only time I do is when someone says something on a thread and I am trying to figure out where they are or how old they are. 

I do not use the search function unless I am going to send a c-mail to someone.  So I just do not really care. 

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Adding new search criteria? - 8/3/2010 7:22:04 PM   
kinkbound


Posts: 387
Joined: 9/15/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: dbloomer


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoiJen

Let's roll with it and see what happens.


I'm curious about your choice to include 6 ways to say "no" and only 1 way to say "yes".


I agree. The poll is skewed to produce a predictably unfavorable outcome for your position.

There should only be 2 or 3 choices:

1) I want a search function choice for ProDommes
2) I do NOT want a search function choice for ProDommes
3) I don't care either way. (optional)

(in reply to dbloomer)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Adding new search criteria? - 8/3/2010 7:31:53 PM   
LadyHibiscus


Posts: 27124
Joined: 8/15/2005
From: Island Of Misfit Toys
Status: offline
Meh. Like the filipino lesbian money doms would actually use the right criteria?

_____________________________

[page 23 girl]



(in reply to kinkbound)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Adding new search criteria? - 8/3/2010 7:36:08 PM   
kinkbound


Posts: 387
Joined: 9/15/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyHibiscus

Meh. Like the filipino lesbian money doms would actually use the right criteria?


Irrelevant.

The poll I suggested is not about technicals. It's about who supports or does not support a conceptual idea.

(in reply to LadyHibiscus)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Adding new search criteria? - 8/4/2010 12:57:41 AM   
myotherself


Posts: 7157
Joined: 3/9/2006
From: The cold bit of the UK
Status: offline
I clicked on 'I think other search criteria should be added too'.

I just waded through the other trainwreck thread, and my head is spinning!

I automatically ignore messages from guys whose profiles whine on about 'fakes and wannabes' or who have posted on the messageboards using a level of fuckwittery that sometimes leaves me breathless with wonder (and not in a good way).

Wading through profiles and postings wastes my precious time - there should be a box which says "I'm the kind of guy/gal who bitches and moans and is generally a really, really negative person". Then I could ignore them and move on to the guys who matter.

edited for typo

< Message edited by myotherself -- 8/4/2010 1:02:14 AM >


_____________________________

There's nowt so queer as folk


(in reply to BoiJen)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Adding new search criteria? - 8/4/2010 1:17:13 AM   
EbonyWood


Posts: 2044
Joined: 7/8/2005
Status: offline
I would like a criteria to separate small furry creatures and cute mammals from non cute reptilian life forms, please.

(in reply to myotherself)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Adding new search criteria? - 8/4/2010 1:54:29 AM   
myotherself


Posts: 7157
Joined: 3/9/2006
From: The cold bit of the UK
Status: offline
awesome idea, EW!

_____________________________

There's nowt so queer as folk


(in reply to EbonyWood)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Adding new search criteria? - 8/4/2010 2:08:03 AM   
VaguelyCurious


Posts: 5264
Joined: 12/2/2009
From: United Kingdom
Status: offline
As the secretary of the local chapter of PFAAB (Parents and Friends of Anteaters and Bunnies) I can't decide if this is progress, as in allowing small fluffies to shout their identities from the rooftops, or discrimination, as in genus-profiling.

_____________________________

Sthetic on FetLife.




(in reply to myotherself)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Adding new search criteria? - 8/4/2010 2:40:04 AM   
realwhiteknight


Posts: 428
Joined: 7/13/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: EbonyWood

I would like a criteria to separate small furry creatures and cute mammals from non cute reptilian life forms, please.


Won't that hurt raptorjesus' feelings? I would feel bad since earlier I threatened him with Lucifer's minions in order to protect Jeff Goldblum from evisceration. I haven't apologized yet.

_____________________________

I carry a log - yes. Is it funny to you? It is not to me.

Behind all things are reasons. Reasons can even explain the absurd. Do we have the time to learn the reasons behind the human being's varied behavior? I think not. Some take the time.

(in reply to EbonyWood)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Adding new search criteria? - 8/4/2010 3:06:35 AM   
EbonyWood


Posts: 2044
Joined: 7/8/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: dbloomer


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoiJen

Let's roll with it and see what happens.


I'm curious about your choice to include 6 ways to say "no" and only 1 way to say "yes".


False.

There is 1 directly positive choice, 1 directly negative choice, 1 proposing further additions, 1 proposing no further additions, and 3 choices of abstention (from making  a committed choice either way).
 
There are therefore 2 ways to support the addition, either specifically or as part of a set, and 2 ways to not support it, either specifically or part of a set.
 
You are assuming abstention implies a selection. It is exactly the opposite, an act of neutrality and indifference.
 
The smart money is on indifference. Of course there is no accounting for the sock puppet vote.

< Message edited by EbonyWood -- 8/4/2010 3:10:40 AM >

(in reply to dbloomer)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Adding new search criteria? - 8/4/2010 7:34:26 AM   
BoiJen


Posts: 2608
Joined: 3/7/2007
Status: offline
Thank you, for explaining the difference between the selections to the dense.

If you have a suggestion for added selection, please, let me know.

boi


_____________________________


Clips of MsKitty doin' stuff to me. Support the fan club, buy a clip today.

(in reply to EbonyWood)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Adding new search criteria? - 8/4/2010 11:22:59 AM   
BoiJen


Posts: 2608
Joined: 3/7/2007
Status: offline
Scratch that...
currently in no particular order...

total votes: 43

(positive votes) more search criteria including separate sections for pro, etc.: 13
(negative votes) no changes, please: 14
(neutral votes) everybody else: 16

Assuming that all votes are legit (shut up sock puppets), those desperately desiring a change in search criteria fall in last, with less than a 1/3 of the vote.

Let's round up and 1/3. 33% is in no way an overwhelming majority seeking change to an established structure. 33% is not enough for ANY company or entity to justify potential overhauls that may incur added expense.

boi

< Message edited by BoiJen -- 8/4/2010 11:34:30 AM >


_____________________________


Clips of MsKitty doin' stuff to me. Support the fan club, buy a clip today.

(in reply to BoiJen)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Adding new search criteria? - 8/4/2010 11:29:20 AM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
I want "bottom" "top" added to orientation. I am soooo tired of dominants emailing me that I am not a submissive... it is the closest thing that is appropriate for me to check, and yet at times I have wished I could have just listed myself as a bottom so they would leave me the fuck alone about the entire thing

_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to BoiJen)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity >> Adding new search criteria? Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094