Attractions?

Attractions? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress

Message

Madame4a -> Attractions? (8/6/2010 9:25:24 AM)
This is specifically related to CM -- as I'm a prurient girl who looks at everyone's profile... and while I'm a dyke, without a doubt, I do like men.. on occasion... on different levels, although its rare. I do look at all kinds of male profiles... all orientations, interests and ages... and so, ladies, because I'm not straight... I'm guessing I don't get it for that reason... but.. what attracts you? And I ask this question because I see so many profiles and I want to send a note and say... "change this, don't use that picture and for goodness sake.... blah blah blah..." of course.. that's because I know better than they do... smirk ... of course I know that's not true.. but I do wonder... so do these things attract you? full naked pics? diapers the "I have my clothes off but probably shouldn't" pics? the baby pic (adult ones) the cock shots? I suppose there are more... but those are my examples I'm curious... very curious... Is my actual aversion to some things because women are less visual? I actually don't really subscribe to that for myself.. I'm visual...

Steponme73 -> RE: Attractions? (8/6/2010 9:30:21 AM)
LOL...I am not gay and pretty old fashioned. But I was thinking the same thing the other day, while I was thumbing through profiles and reading. I don't get it... Why would you not want to put your best assests out there (clothed) and let people decide on the Vanilla side first. That is where I would think it would start.

BonesFromAsh -> RE: Attractions? (8/6/2010 9:44:01 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Madame4a so do these things attract you? full naked pics? diapers the "I have my clothes off but probably shouldn't" pics? the baby pic (adult ones) the cock shots? Add to this list pics of men in some chastity device, "action" shots and a display of someone's toy collection as a main photo. No, none of the above appeal to me. In fact, I'd prefer no photo to these examples. Neither do journals that are full of nothing but negative complaints about fakes and all the disappointments the writer has experienced on CM.

LadyHibiscus -> RE: Attractions? (8/6/2010 10:18:40 AM)
I think your list is more like what REPELS me, M4a!! And, they are such a good clue to who is a fetishist/exhibitionist, rather than a submissive type. How do I know? Because I write to some of them and say DUDE! Take that pic down NOW! [:'(] Most of them respond positively. [:)]

LadyPact -> RE: Attractions? (8/6/2010 11:10:42 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyHibiscus I think your list is more like what REPELS me, M4a!! And, they are such a good clue to who is a fetishist/exhibitionist, rather than a submissive type. How do I know? Because I write to some of them and say DUDE! Take that pic down NOW! [:'(] Most of them respond positively. [:)] We must be on the same wavelength today, for at least part of this. Personally, I don't mind the "action" shots (as BFA mentioned) if we're talking about something like a nice rope bondage shot or something very artistically done with needles, I'm all for it. The chastity device shot doesn't quite hit the bar there. And for the love of Mike, LOSE THE FREAKIN' PICS THAT INCLUDE OTHER PEOPLE! Males, if that's not your Owner or somebody that you're currently playing with, take the pic down. One of the things that makes Me roll My eyes back the furthest in My head are the shots of someone standing with another person and they have blurred the face. Yeah. Real attractive. NOT!

LadyHibiscus -> RE: Attractions? (8/6/2010 11:23:21 AM)
OH and those pics that show your HOUSE!! I have used the bathroom mirror, but I make sure the area behind me is a DOOR or my pretty shower curtain, NOT a mess of clothing and towels! Criminy. (I don't consider bondage shots bad, LP, or the nice needle stuff. Mainly the Ew. Like the "slave" whose pic was faceless, but had his hand on his erect cock. Um.Yeah.)

LaTigresse -> RE: Attractions? (8/6/2010 11:30:06 AM)
I can only agree with what the other lovely ladies above me have already said. I have my profile set so that, when I am logged in, I only see female profiles..........or those that identify as female anyway. Now don't get me wrong, if I love a woman I am going to want to see all her bits, at some point, but I soooooooooooooooo do not want to see a photo of her vagina before I see or read anything, get to know her. I don't want to see a pair of purple, bound, breasts. And I don't care to see her asshole either. I place dick photos in that same category. I can appreciate a fine looking man any day of the week but I will laugh every single time at the photo of the guy wearing sunglasses, with arms crossed across his chest trying to look like a badass. Or standing beside/sitting on his boat, motorcycle, car......penile extension.[:D] I really prefer a nice clear face photo, smiling is bonus points. There is one guy, from somewhere out east, that used to write me off and on.......omg I could melt in that guys eyes. Just yummy.

BonesFromAsh -> RE: Attractions? (8/6/2010 11:31:55 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact Personally, I don't mind the "action" shots (as BFA mentioned) if we're talking about something like a nice rope bondage shot or something very artistically done with needles, I'm all for it. The chastity device shot doesn't quite hit the bar there. I should have clarified....by action shots I meant they're either on the giving or recieving end of something sexual. Creative shots of bondage or needles are interesting so long as it's tasteful (a relative term, I know).

porcelaine -> RE: Attractions? (8/6/2010 12:37:33 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Madame4a and so, ladies, because I'm not straight... I'm guessing I don't get it for that reason... but.. what attracts you? I don't read CM profiles and the other ladies echoed my sentiments on this subject quite well. I believe in simplicity and oftentimes the things I read say a whole bunch of nothing or try to spell out ones life story instead. I have always felt that the profile is and should be a snapshot. It is a delightful taste that compels a would be purveyor to make contact. I like intelligence and articulation that isn't overly verbose. Tasteful images that highlight his attractiveness and masculinity. Presence is great if he can muster it and something of substance that separates him from the masses. I call that the proverbial why me statement. Bonus points if he avoids pleading, detailed fantasies, overly romanticized notions about submission, grandiose promises, and the relocation statement when he doesn't know where you live. I often wonder if he's behind in his bills. [:D] ~porcelaine

SnowRanger -> RE: Attractions? (8/6/2010 4:46:48 PM)
Hello A/all, This is an interesting thread for me for one reason. A Domme I know thinks that I should include a nude body photo in my photo line up. She insists that I cut a pretty impressive figure (for an broken down timber beast). I gather the impression from her that I will be subjected to an avalanche of responses. I am duboius of that. OH! By the way: I thought that the issue of Rooster Photos was settled! Respectfully, Mike SnowRanger

LadyPact -> RE: Attractions? (8/6/2010 6:57:26 PM)
Would you mind a little unsolicited advice, Mike? I think it's better to have that kind of a pic available if somebody asks for it. Women who don't want to see that kind of shot won't be offended and those that do will be satisfied when you send it. I tend to think that women who are more familiar (friend, etc) are more likely to want to see the goods than folks who aren't. I know it's pretty long, but just take a look at the reactions through the "Men In Panties" thread that was running a while back. The males that were well known from the forums got a great reception. Many of the women from both sides of the whip paid complements. When pics were posted of someone that wasn't known, nobody said a word except a Mod. (Probably so he wouldn't get his feelings hurt.) Not one other woman complimented that particular poster, even though he put up several shots, and he was pretty much ignored. Just something to think about.

MaamJay -> RE: Attractions? (8/7/2010 12:02:09 AM)
M4a, yep they're My "dislike" list too. I really don't need that to be My introduction to someone! I'm also not partial to ones where they look really slovenly. Why would I want a guy like that around? He doesn't have to be in a tux ... but he could look neat and clean, with hair that looks like it's been washed recently! While I like a face photo I do understand why people can't always make that public (same reason I don't) but a tasteful clothed body shot, or a distant shot where the face isn't easily seen is good. Some nudes I have seen have been good, where the body is artfully arranged in a submissive posture and the bits aren't visible ... for eg, a side view of a low kneeling pose can be very tasteful. I am less upset by a bdsm action shot eg him in ropes as long as it's not too sexually graphic, it can give Me an impression of what he's interested in and at least shows that he really has played before and isn't an onscreen only! I too have written to some and explained why their choice of pic isn't a good idea, most have taken it well, the occasional one has become abusive in which case the BLOCK button is My friend! Maam Jay aka violet[A]

COINT -> RE: Attractions? (8/7/2010 7:59:43 AM)
I prefer pic on request. I can't and don't my face all over the net. In return, I would rather you shared it with me privately or on My request.

leadership527 -> RE: Attractions? (8/7/2010 9:28:31 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Madame4a Is my actual aversion to some things because women are less visual? I actually don't really subscribe to that for myself.. I'm visual... Well, I'm a guy and yeah, like most guys, visual to a degree. But when I see a female profile dripping with nude shots, then I conclude this personal is selling sex because they want sex. None of that would be compatible with me who wants to form relationships so I just move on.

SaharahEve -> RE: Attractions? (8/7/2010 9:54:55 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Madame4a so do these things attract you? full naked pics?[...] the cock shots? I suppose there are more... but those are my examples Is my actual aversion to some things because women are less visual? I actually don't really subscribe to that for myself.. I'm visual... There are a lot of exhibitionist GWCs on the internet. They like showing themselves off. I suppose it does something for then but it does nothing for me. Well lit portraits or tasteful nudes are more appealing to me. What really does it for me is when a man can produce an image salute the way I want, because until I actually believe the user actually is the man in the photo, pictures, as pretty as they can be, mean little to nothing. Although the "what are you thinking" factor with the choices some make in their profile image posts serves as a great measure of first-impression common sense.

Ladynslave -> RE: Attractions? (8/7/2010 11:04:30 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Madame4a full naked pics? *If artistically done, yes. Nudity can be a beautiful thing.* diapers *No, I raised my sons, they are fully potty trained, my play partners should be too.* the "I have my clothes off but probably shouldn't" pics? *Not really sure what you meant, so I have no answer.* the baby pic (adult ones) *I had my tubes tied as I knew I didn't want more babies, including adult ones.* the cock shots? I know I am one of the strange ones here, but I don't really mind. I like to know what I would be getting. A large one can turn me on to no end. A very small one can provided me with a giggle before I move on to something else. That is not to say I believe it should be the main picture though. There are plenty of other things I would like to see before I meet junior.

MsBlackMamba -> RE: Attractions? (8/7/2010 1:01:07 PM)
full naked pics? NOPE diapers NOPE the "I have my clothes off but probably shouldn't" pics? NOPE the baby pic (adult ones) NOPE the cock shots? NOPE I'm not turned on by any of the above. I like to see males dressed in suits or even a simple shirt and slacks combination. As the relationship that I seek entails more than just scening I have to picture the guy "fitting" into my vanilla life.

MistressTonya2u -> RE: Attractions? (8/7/2010 6:25:33 PM)
full naked pics? It depends, if it is going to be full nude, I prefer it to be from the back. There is one male on the other side of cm who views me on a regular basis and his photo is of him, naked facing the woods, with his hands behind his head. I find that photo apealing, but then again, he has a nice ass which does not hurt either. diapers No the "I have my clothes off but probably shouldn't" pics? No the baby pic (adult ones) No the cock shots? It depends, if I am seeing just his cock, it is a No, but if it is some sort of artistic type photo where he is bound and his cock is visible, then I am okay with that. BTW: if he has a huge cock, showing it to me is going to scare me off. I am of the smaller (no more than 7 inches) is better variety.

theGuideGoddess -> RE: Attractions? (8/8/2010 4:00:18 PM)
So do these things attract you? full naked pics? Seldom to never, I would rather know someone first. Partial nudity and a hot body....well.....that's enticing. diapers NEVER! Not my kink. the "I have my clothes off but probably shouldn't" pics? Shows poor judgment & taste: Unattractive. the baby pic (adult ones) Would not appeal at all to me. the cock shots? A few have been entertaining, but this does not attract me at all. The first attractor factor has to be what is in their minds. Personality would also define attractiveness, at least for me. TGG

Page: [1]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875