RE: Anchor Baby Terrorists (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


DarlingSavage -> RE: Anchor Baby Terrorists (8/14/2010 1:38:15 AM)

I can dig it!




joether -> RE: Anchor Baby Terrorists (8/14/2010 2:33:28 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarlingSavage

quote:


I'm still for helping the conservatives change the 14th Amendment to a conservative view point.......IF.......They agree, liberals can change the 2nd Amendment to a liberal view point. Fair is fair, right? Any of you conservatives up to the deal?


I'm a liberal to the nth degree and I still think we need the second amendment.  I don't even own a gun, but I think we need to reserve the right to bear arms.  This was mainly to ensure that we would always be able to defend ourselves against those in power.  Though, I certainly can see the other half of it, that some people that shouldn't have guns, do, but I don't think that gun control is going to stop that.  On the other hand, how do we defend ourselves against a government that has nuclear weapons, among a myriad of many other tools of destruction?  Still, though, I would like to take comfort in knowing that when my government is wrong, I have a right to stand up against it. 



Ok, I dont think you quite understood the arguement. This is an arguement regarding the 14th, NOT, the 2nd. I put in, that conservatives want to change the 14th, to their view point. So I simply took one of two amendments, that they would NEVER, want to have changed, by a liberal. It basically means, for them to stop and think, that if they do so on the 14th, liberals can then go to the 2nd, and modify it. Now, how dangerous do you think either action is for the nation, both now, and 50 years down the road?


In other news (and on topic), Mr. Anderson Cooper had a interview with Rep. Louie Gohmert of Texas. To his credit, Mr. Cooper remains professional, and on topic. This guy is totally wacko on the subject. No evidence, no links, no persons, nothing. Just a bunch of conspiracies; which is to say, things are 'normal' in the conservative camp this week.




DarlingSavage -> RE: Anchor Baby Terrorists (8/14/2010 11:59:34 AM)

Boy, that Debbie Riddle is not that difficult to figure out.  I'm so ashamed of my home state sometimes.  I never heard of either of these people, but they are obviously certifiable. Thanks for the link, I do like Anderson Cooper!




DarlingSavage -> RE: Anchor Baby Terrorists (8/14/2010 12:04:02 PM)

I just had to share this one comment from the link:

bobfenton1 2 hours ago 5 [image]http://s.ytimg.com/yt/img/pixel-vfl73.gif[/image] This representative has a "gaping hole" in his head.
It was just too funny!





DomYngBlk -> RE: Anchor Baby Terrorists (8/14/2010 4:21:05 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Gohmert Continues to Push ‘Terror Babies’ Debate on 14th Amendment

quote:

Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Tex.) reasserted his claim last night that Al Qaeda may be sending women to the U.S. to birth a contingent of future terrorists credentialed with American passports.

Gohmert argued with host Anderson Cooper, who asked him to provide proof to back up his claims about the phenomenon. He said “the evidence abounds” but failed to produce a source for his information, other than an anonymous former FBI agent.


Gohmert Continues to Push ‘Terror Babies’ Debate on 14th Amendment

There is also this interesting video of Rep. Gohmert arguing the point with CNN's Anderson Cooper. Video

The fact that Anderson Cooper had a person to say there was no credible, tangible evidence that any terrorist group was sending women to the US to have children who are born as US citizens to be taken back and raised to be terrorists.

And I have thought that some of the conspiracy theories posted in this forum were bizarre.


If he wasn't in the House of Representatives it would have been fucking funny. Still, there has to be padded cell with his name on it.




Lucylastic -> RE: Anchor Baby Terrorists (8/14/2010 4:27:13 PM)

Anderson Coopers face was worth watching the other dilbert rant on




Jeffff -> RE: Anchor Baby Terrorists (8/14/2010 4:36:35 PM)

If that was my Rep. I would be cringing and telling people I lived in another district.




joether -> RE: Anchor Baby Terrorists (8/14/2010 4:45:47 PM)

If that was my Representative, I'd be asking him to explain himself. As he doesn't just represent his district, but, the whole of his state. And there are plenty of Republicans that want this guy back in office. Someone who makes wild accusations, with no hard evidence, and then expects people to go along with him.

It was funny to watch Mr. Cooper; he was trying hard not to laugh or get annoyed at this person. But then, Mr. Cooper is a serious and professional journalist.




DarlingSavage -> RE: Anchor Baby Terrorists (8/14/2010 4:53:13 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Anderson Coopers face was worth watching the other dilbert rant on



I agree, he is SUCH a cutie!  I'd hit that!


[image]local://upfiles/875047/F76DB75B3D4C475FAA70E685057E897E.gif[/image]




DarlingSavage -> RE: Anchor Baby Terrorists (8/14/2010 4:57:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

If that was my Representative, I'd be asking him to explain himself. As he doesn't just represent his district, but, the whole of his state. And there are plenty of Republicans that want this guy back in office. Someone who makes wild accusations, with no hard evidence, and then expects people to go along with him.

It was funny to watch Mr. Cooper; he was trying hard not to laugh or get annoyed at this person. But then, Mr. Cooper is a serious and professional journalist.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

If that was my Rep. I would be cringing and telling people I lived in another district.


He may be a rep for the state of Texas, but he's not MY rep, I didn't vote for him and I refuse to take responsibility.  I don't understand people that act like that.  It's a simple question.  Everyone is expected provide sources and references, unless it's somebody in a major corporation that's going to be offed for revealing externalities that are causing serious health impacts to the surrounding community.  But even then, those guys show why or how they know such and such.  That guy was an idiot.  He must be from Connecticut too!




alwayssummer -> RE: Anchor Baby Terrorists (8/16/2010 12:32:28 AM)

OMG That Gommert Guy is the same Monolith of Stupidtude whose hate & ignorance were so easily ambushed in the Molly Ivins segment of Dildo Diaries...like 10- 15 years ago.  I knew he looked familiar...





thompsonx -> RE: Anchor Baby Terrorists (8/16/2010 10:54:30 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Im known for saying exactly what i mean, julia. Your own article spoke about afluent visitors coming here for sometimes months to ensure their children have a US claim for education and travel. But its my term that you wish to jump all over.

Perhaps you need to look in a mirror.


No you are not.
You are well known for your snide and snarky comments which you use with ease when you cannot defend your position with fact.




tazzygirl -> RE: Anchor Baby Terrorists (8/16/2010 9:15:15 PM)

tommy, just because you cant argue your way out of a paper bag doesnt mean others are exactly like you. The last few times we matched posts i proved my point extremely well. the fact that you couldnt see it past your own personal bias was very obvious... and really must have pissed you off since you are still attempting to goad others into arguments.

nice try [;)]




juliaoceania -> RE: Anchor Baby Terrorists (8/16/2010 9:34:30 PM)

quote:

the fact that you couldnt see it past your own personal bias was very obvious...


If that isn't the pot calling the kettle black I don't know what is




tazzygirl -> RE: Anchor Baby Terrorists (8/16/2010 9:36:06 PM)

Where have i not seen past my own bias?




juliaoceania -> RE: Anchor Baby Terrorists (8/16/2010 9:37:25 PM)

Almost every time I see you debate something and beat it to death, like a dog with a bone, repeating the same thing over and over and over again no matter what anyone posts in reply to you

A certain religion thread comes to mind...




tazzygirl -> RE: Anchor Baby Terrorists (8/16/2010 9:39:01 PM)

Ah so because i dont see things the way you do, its my bias i cant see past... hmmm... ever thought, perhaps, its your own bias i can see through? [;)]




juliaoceania -> RE: Anchor Baby Terrorists (8/16/2010 9:45:13 PM)

Tazzy, I have tried on a few occasions to post an agreement to some point you made or other, because I often agree with you... but even when I agree with you I find your way of debating often undercuts your position... so no, I don't think in this case it is because I suffer from a "bias". I am actually not biased against you.

whether or not you believe it is really of no concern to me, either






tazzygirl -> RE: Anchor Baby Terrorists (8/16/2010 9:58:15 PM)

No one was speaking of a bias against me. We see certain issues from different ends, on that im sure you can at least agree. I have made a concentrated effort not to demean or belittle anyone's point of view... simply offered up facts as i find them

I have no clue about you or your life, nor am i asking now. But because i state that i am against illegal immigration, according to some i am a bigot. Its extremely interesting to see how some seem to know me so well that they can make such a statement against me, or anyone else for that matter. Even more interesting that you can decide im panicked and hysterical. In that, i do think you have shown a bias, not against me, but towards your own thinking and refusing to admit there are more than even two sides to an issue.




thompsonx -> RE: Anchor Baby Terrorists (8/16/2010 10:14:56 PM)

quote:

But because i state that i am against illegal immigration, according to some i am a bigot.

No one has accused you of being a bigot because you are against illegal immigration. I have accused you of being a bigot because you would prefer to waste taxpayers money on treating the symptom (the illegal alien) as opposed to the cause (those who employ illegal aliens).
So puuuleeezzzze do not be disingenuous in your sanctimonious protestations.



Its extremely interesting to see how some seem to know me so well that they can make such a statement against me,
I only know you from your post.
What you post is what I respond to.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.703125