MrRodgers
Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: sravaka Hello, crazy-ass politics and religion people.... Brief prefatory note: I like (in a certain sense of the word) reading what goes on here.... but am 1. far too chicken shit and 2. far too poorly prepared to actually participate as a a rule. But I have a question for y'all. I've just been watching on netflix the mini series about John Adams that aired a few years ago on HBO. In the midst of the Alien and Sedition Act business, when Adams is president, he has an exchange with Jefferson (then his VP) about allying with France vs. allying with Britain.... and Jefferson (in this telling) came out with some stunning (and I can't help suspecting, anachronistic) statement about how the states would not sit by if constitutional rights to free speech were curtailed-- they might well revolt. It made me wonder... 1) did thinking this idealistic ever really exist? 2) if it did, what the hell happened to it???? I am a mere girl, with no experience of firearms or any other conduit of violence.... but yanno? if i were to take up arms against anything, it would be against dimwits who sought to curtail freedom in the name of "freedom". In other words, I'd be on Jefferson's side. (I say that, and yet it's not really true. the best I could possibly do is wound someone in the toe by stomping hard.) When/how did the left become docile and the right become aggravated?? Wouldn't it make infinitely more sense for the right to be complacent and the left to be striving and agitating (given that the right is typically on the side of powerholders?)? Or am I just misunderstanding or misapplying? In response to and in answer to your questions...I'll try. First I must admit, I don't know what allying ourselves with Britain or France has to do with the freedom of speech. As for the state militias rising up against the feds...you are correct and in fact the feds and the states were prohibited from using either army for local law enforcement via the Posse Comitatus Act. In the constitution there was to be NO peace-time standing army at all without a renewal from congress every two years. Seems I think, they must have been doing that every two years since the Civil war or...why not stay at war say come 1898 ? That act has been modified to allow just that now. Such idealistic principles did exist as these men did really comit everything to the cause. It no, does not exist today as it was all eaten and swallowed up in the cauldron of greed and power. Not only did Jefferson feel as if a revolution every twenty or so years was a good thing. Easy for him to say having come out whole in his. But, he and Adams were for the federal govt. enforcing the constitution...only. The states were to retain almost all other rights. Adams the federlist was for federal power mainly for the protection of the union...not engrossing its power upon the people. Yes the A & S act was the darkest moment of Adam's entire life. The right in America has fully aligned itself with capitalist profiteers and seek the power of money now constitutionally protected as something called political speech. It has morphed from the progressive radicals that once upon a time supported every person born here...was a citizen and the idea of anti-trust and its concomitant preservation of competition. No more.
|