StrangerThan
Posts: 1515
Joined: 4/25/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
When I say I advocate for "tolerance", i am saying let people do what they are free to do in peace and leave them the fuck alone. quote:
ORIGINAL: juliaoceania quote:
And I'm quickly finding you to be like a slug squirming in its own ooze in this debate because you revert to vague references of tolerance every time your RIGHTS tact is blunted. Give me your definition of tolerance. Where does it go past allowing them to worship in peace, according them respect for their beliefs and giving them the same protections under the Constitution? Where does it accept violence from one but not from others? I'm just curious as to what tolerance really means to you and what constitutes intolerance because from what I see, intolerance seems to be not agreeing with you, not embracing. Tolerating doesn't seem to fit within the confines of tolerance. I have said nothing wrong here, I keep repeating myself over and over again... Look up "tolerance" in the dictionary... tolerating something and accepting it are two different things. When I say I advocate for "tolerance", i am saying let people do what they are free to do in peace and leave them the fuck alone. Accepting them would be going over and having dinner with them and making friends with them and being buddy buddy with them... I don't expect you or anyone else to do that, although I have chosen to accept people who practice Islam the same way I accept Christians or Buddhists, or anyone else for that matter I think you are conflating again. There are several threads going on in this section right now, one of which is about nonMuslim extremists... perhaps in your mind the fact that thread exists means I am posting on it and having arguments about one form of violence being better than another. I don't know where this "violence" is coming from, or tolerating it or not tolerating it. I can't remember posting about other people being violent or not violent. Religion can be a force of peace or a force of violence, and in my study of the topic, it matters not what the faith is, but the socio-economic factors that exist around that religion that determines which religion is used to engender... I have academic sources about the topic if you care to read them Then we can agree that our definition of tolerance differs but probably has a common basis somewhere. I'll tolerate them, accord them their rights, and due respect as long as they don't expect me to bend over and kiss their ass in the process. That isn't directed specifically towards muslims. That's directed to anyone who has an agenda. But I do not see this topic as one of rights or religious intolerance. I see it as one of emotion more than anything. Obama was correct in both of his statements, the one indicating their right to do so, and the one stepping away from the wisdom of it. As far as the definition of tolerance, it might help if you post your personal definition before you start accusing anyone of being intolerant. Cause yeah, accepting in the sense of being buddy-buddy isn't something I'm going to make an effort to do.
_____________________________
--'Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to reform' - Mark Twain
|