|
FamilyofM -> RE: How do male submissives differ from "cubs" (from the Cougar-cub mix) (9/3/2010 10:14:55 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: AAkasha
On "Cougarlife," the site defines "cubs" as:
"To snare a true Cougar a man needs to be youthful, fit, unintimidated and of course sexually driven! These men can range from athletes to intellectuals, and from technologists to entrepreneurs and all points in between; they can come in all shapes and sizes, but one thing they have in common is the desire to possess a sexually charged older woman."
I'm curious if femdoms consider this definition of a man to be attractive, and how it might overlap or not with what a woman defines as "submissive." If you remove the age particulars out of it, and consider it instead that a woman is looking to be the one in control in a relationship, are there many similarities between what a "cougar" seeks in a "cub" and what a "femdom" seeks in a "male sub"?
Akasha
I find that to be an interesting description. My "cub" did not snare me. He is obviously youthful or the "Cougar" dynamic would not be there. He showed interest, polite, attentive interest. I learned that we had much in common and it simply blossomed from there. And at 24 I highly doubt he wanted to possess me, he simply hoped for a return email. He still does not possess me, he belongs to me.
I would imagine that the only difference, at least to me, in cougar/cub and femdom/male sub would be that age does not always play a part in the femdom relationship whereas we all know that age is of utmost importance in defining a "cougar/cub" type relationship. At first I found the term cougar to be annoying, now it is simply amusing to me. I'm even thinking of ordering a delightful "Cougar Bait" t-shirt for my pet to wear when we are together. It will help the masses out, as most of them are thinking it anyway.
Mistress Michelle
Trying to come up with a catchy signature line [:)]
|
|
|
|
