SaharahEve
Posts: 231
Joined: 6/25/2009 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Steponme73 The broad definition of sadism is "getting sexual gratification out of inflicting pain and suffering on others". Does it make any difference to you whether it is male or female? Even if you are a straight female dominant, would you get pleasure out of inflicting pain on a female sub? It seems to me that a true sadist would not care who it was or what it was, just that someone or something was suffering at their hands. Am I right or wrong? As it has already been said, there is sadism and then there is sexual sadism. A girl needn't be sexually aroused by cruelty to be a sadist, but if she is, I'd think her sexual preferences would have something to do with who she inflicts pain upon. It doesn't mean she can't be generally amused by putting a victim through his paces, though. I can be bent over laughing at someone's humiliation and pain, but that doesn't mean I'm sexually aroused. As for sadism in general, your ending question doesn't have a one size fits all answer. For some, any warm body would do. For others (myself included), there are certain prerequisites, ideal personalities, ideal bodies, scenarios and so on, and that's because the pleasure is so psychologically—and physiologically—intimate. Just because we have certain tastes in order to bring out the dragon doesn't mean we're not "true sadists".
_____________________________
Saharah S a h a r a h E v e . c o m nanshakh.com
|