Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon???


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? - 9/12/2010 8:46:48 AM   
jillian4you4fun


Posts: 24
Joined: 8/9/2009
Status: offline
For starters
Someone wanna explain who was wearing workboots on the moon?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZzkoG0SIEcs

(in reply to sappatoti)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? - 9/12/2010 9:03:49 AM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cuckoldmepls

Another good question. Why did Buzz Aldrin sock the snot out of a guy when he asked him to swear on the bible that he actually stepped foot on the moon.

Most people would do it without even thinking twice about it. But for Buzz Aldrin, he didn't like the idea that someone was questioning him.



Probably because Aldrin knows an idiot when he sees one and he doesn't like idiots.

(in reply to cuckoldmepls)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? - 9/12/2010 9:05:11 AM   
Twoshoes


Posts: 1218
Joined: 7/27/2010
Status: offline
I own the Moon.
No more unwelcome visitors, thank you.

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? - 9/12/2010 9:12:39 AM   
sappatoti


Posts: 14844
Joined: 10/30/2006
From: the edge of darkness...
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: jillian4you4fun
For starters
Someone wanna explain who was wearing workboots on the moon?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZzkoG0SIEcs

Those who are continuing to perpetrate hoax stories really need to get their act together. Same photo composition, different source. You decide.

http://www.xomba.com/apollo_11_hoax_photos_8_moon_landing_myths_busted

< Message edited by sappatoti -- 9/12/2010 9:13:12 AM >


_____________________________

Never mind the man on the edge of the darkness... he means no harm...

"Community, Identity, Stability." ~ A Brave New World, Aldous Huxley, 1932

If you don't like my attitude, QUIT TALKING TO ME!

(in reply to jillian4you4fun)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? - 9/12/2010 9:29:08 AM   
cuckoldmepls


Posts: 855
Joined: 11/29/2007
Status: offline
Holy crap, I spotted the foot print even before they pointed it out. It's obviously not an astronaut boot.

(in reply to sappatoti)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? - 9/12/2010 9:30:14 AM   
sappatoti


Posts: 14844
Joined: 10/30/2006
From: the edge of darkness...
Status: offline
And you obviously, then, did not look at the photo in my link for in that photo, the workboot footprint isn't there.

_____________________________

Never mind the man on the edge of the darkness... he means no harm...

"Community, Identity, Stability." ~ A Brave New World, Aldous Huxley, 1932

If you don't like my attitude, QUIT TALKING TO ME!

(in reply to cuckoldmepls)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? - 9/12/2010 9:40:38 AM   
DCWoody


Posts: 1401
Joined: 10/27/2006
Status: offline
Technically he's correct, it's not an 'astronaut boot' if it's shoop. I suspect he's just pulling your (our) leg since the whole 'satellite photos of my house on google earth' thing.

(in reply to sappatoti)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? - 9/12/2010 9:44:48 AM   
sappatoti


Posts: 14844
Joined: 10/30/2006
From: the edge of darkness...
Status: offline
Or cucky may be ignoring other photographic evidence, hoax or not, that doesn't show the boot at all (as in my previous post).

It's interesting that these "anomalies" only appear on lower resolution, course grained material and not the crisper, higher resolution shots. Gee... I wonder why.

_____________________________

Never mind the man on the edge of the darkness... he means no harm...

"Community, Identity, Stability." ~ A Brave New World, Aldous Huxley, 1932

If you don't like my attitude, QUIT TALKING TO ME!

(in reply to DCWoody)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? - 9/12/2010 12:28:23 PM   
thornhappy


Posts: 8596
Joined: 12/16/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Twoshoes
I own the Moon.
No more unwelcome visitors, thank you.

So YOU'RE the one who put up that honkin' big "No Trespassing" sign on the Sea of Tranquility!!!

(in reply to Twoshoes)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? - 9/12/2010 10:27:09 PM   
Carouselambra


Posts: 99
Joined: 9/9/2010
Status: offline
This is a very successful troll. 

_____________________________

If you talk to God, you are praying. If God talks to you, you have schizophrenia. -Thomas Szasz

(in reply to thornhappy)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? - 9/12/2010 10:50:17 PM   
Twoshoes


Posts: 1218
Joined: 7/27/2010
Status: offline
Thank you for your flattery.
However, this will not be sufficient to get you to the moon.

Now back to the serious issue at hand:
Is there factual proof of the trespassing and does it legally warrant financial or material compensation?

(in reply to Carouselambra)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? - 9/13/2010 12:32:54 AM   
MistressRosalyn


Posts: 908
Joined: 8/16/2009
Status: offline
I do believe that we landed on the moon multiple times, and that we brought back samples of lunar material. I could go on for hours about why I believe this, but I won't.

But isn't it interesting that NASA still gets so het up whenever there is even a hint of a bit of Lunar material going astray? Wonder why that is?
Then there is the Honduran moon rock...'In November 1996, Rosen had the sample tested at Harvard University, where "Electron Microprobe Specialist" David Lange confirmed in a letter that "the mineral compositions and textural information are consistent with the rock chip being a sample from lunar rock 70017."'

Lunar rocks have a distinct composition, which can be identified. We have approximately 862 pounds of lunar material that is not from a meteorite, and it has been in the possession of NASA since December 1973, at the least. If we didn't land on the moon, how did we get it?


_____________________________

Member of Lance's Fag Hags.

I have 20 Fluffy Points and you don't!

I went to the Dark Side...now where are the cookies?

When did my life become a Jerry Springer/Jeremy Kyle episode?

(in reply to Twoshoes)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? - 9/13/2010 12:34:09 AM   
MistressRosalyn


Posts: 908
Joined: 8/16/2009
Status: offline
So yeah TwoShoes, you can nail us for theft, too! 

_____________________________

Member of Lance's Fag Hags.

I have 20 Fluffy Points and you don't!

I went to the Dark Side...now where are the cookies?

When did my life become a Jerry Springer/Jeremy Kyle episode?

(in reply to MistressRosalyn)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? - 9/13/2010 4:46:08 AM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
FR

One thing I've noticed about conspiracy nuts is that they think they know more than most, that they aren't fooled by the PTB, that they are somehow special. This is different than conspiracy theorists, if the meaning of the words is taken literally, that is reading the lines rather than in between the lines. In the true sense of the term I qualify as a conspiracy theorist, but not a nut. I accept that the suits lie, they have false flag operations, and all kinds of shit. I only believe half of what I see. Then there is the third group who blindly follow like sheeple and poo poo anything that goes against accepted "facts". Well as they say it takes all kinds, and obviously we have them all right here.

NOW DO NOT IGNORE THIS POST ! I want a fucking answetr to the ensuing question and I want it from someone with at least some scientific background. I was a younster when all this happened and I studied the whole thing fervently, I was extremely interested in astronomy of all kinds, anything off the Earth I wanted to know. I studied and understand just how a moonshot is accomplished, because I made it a point to know. There are a myriad of problems not the least of which is getting the craft out of geosychronous orbit onto a bit straighter path to the moon, this with puny little rockets that wouldn't fire an ICBM, but it must be done or the trip would take so long it would have been forgotten by the time they got back. Then reestablishing the otbit so that the capsule is not moving at 11,000 MPH horizontally upon reentry. All these things I studied AT THE TIME. Did you ?

Now IF the moonshot really happened I know a hell of alot about just how it was done. I followed the progress of the whole thing AT THE TIME to the exclusion of all else, so I pretty much know how it worked.

Now there seem to be brainiacs around here who know more that Russian astronomers, people who went to schools of the time and studied hard sciences instead of the mating habits of the red footed booby and all kinds of stupid, useless shit they fill the kids' minds with these days. Like what genus is this bird, who the fuck cares ? This is why this country is fucking useless.

Now I can give quite a bit of detail about just how a moonshot, or any interplanetary travel is accomplished. If you would like a thirty page post, I'll get right on it, but the burden of proof is not upon me, as I did not assert the conspiracy theory.

I want just one of you who thinks the moonshot was a hoax to tell me just how the hoax was perpetrated.

I WANT AN ANSWER. YES I AM YELLING. You tell me brainiacs, how they pulled this off when Russia, which surprising to most were neck and neck with us in technology, was watching like a hawk. Tell me how they fooled astronomers all over the world, or are you so narrow minded to think that the only telescopes in the world are in the US and occupied by the CIA during the whole thing ? Did you think the rest of the world was stupid ?

If you, any of you had any significant knowledge of the subject you would know that it would be just as difficult and expensive to fake, as to actually accomplish.

I want it all, where did they hide that craft for the duration ? How did they tell even amateur astronomers about the course corrections required so they could see the ship with their telescopes, and the trajectory made sense to anyone who knows their math ?

Remember, they used to sell telescopes all over the place, Department stores had some quite powerful (and expensive) models all on display. And Edmund Scientific was not a friggin toy store at the time either. They are shit now but if you look at one of their catalogues from that time there is a BIG difference. That was when this country excelled in the hard sciences, rather than thievery.

And with all the cost of faking it, you might include the reason for faking it.(to appease JFK maybe ? ) NASA was fully aware that the Russians were right there, they knew everyone would be watching and surely they hadn't coopted each and every astronomer in the world. During the cold war ? Yeah right. Can you imagine the notariety a Russian astronomer would get for uncovering such a hoax ? So they were quite impelled to do so, but they didn't/couldn't. To assert that would be to say that the entire cold war was a fake, which is a possibility, so if you can get past all the science to MY satifisfaction, include a corrollory about the "fake" cold war as well.

Do it. Those who doubt the validity of the moonshot are now conspiracy nuts until proven otherwise. This is page four of this thread and I don't want to hear about any fucking bootprints. I want the mechanics of the scam. If you think you are smarter than everyone else, FUCKING PROVE IT.

And remember I was there, and I was not playing baseball. I am no dummy when it comes to this shit, and I have made my assertion. What's more the Russians were not stupid either, in fact they actually beat us into space, and we only beat them to the moon by a matter of months. And don't give me any cockamamie asshole websites either written by people who were born twenty year later, I WAS THERE !

PROVE IT TO ME, not that it was faked, just tell me how it was/could be faked. This is page four of this thread, I will be watching.

And just to give you some incentive, if noone steps up to the plate with some hard science, you think people pollute threads now ? Well that's the challenge. Do it or else I will wreck each and every thread on this board that deals with anything scientific. Other people do it, and they do it with a hell of alot less ammunition.

Enough said, you have your task.

T

(in reply to MistressRosalyn)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? - 9/13/2010 3:33:31 PM   
MistressRosalyn


Posts: 908
Joined: 8/16/2009
Status: offline
Damn Termy, way to kill a thread, just go and introduce logic!



_____________________________

Member of Lance's Fag Hags.

I have 20 Fluffy Points and you don't!

I went to the Dark Side...now where are the cookies?

When did my life become a Jerry Springer/Jeremy Kyle episode?

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? - 9/13/2010 3:54:59 PM   
Hippiekinkster


Posts: 5512
Joined: 11/20/2007
From: Liechtenstein
Status: offline
I find it almost beyond belief that Cucky actually, serendipitously, managed to find his way to Earth.

_____________________________

"We are convinced that freedom w/o Socialism is privilege and injustice, and that Socialism w/o freedom is slavery and brutality." Bakunin

“Nothing we do, however virtuous, can be accomplished alone; therefore we are saved by love.” Reinhold Ne

(in reply to MistressRosalyn)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? - 9/15/2010 1:08:50 PM   
cuckoldmepls


Posts: 855
Joined: 11/29/2007
Status: offline
Ok, here's the photographic proof we landed on the moon, NOT!!! This is the best they can do from a sophistacated military orbiter. Bullshit.

http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/missions/apollo15_touchdown_photos_010427.html

(in reply to Hippiekinkster)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? - 9/15/2010 1:12:44 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Your argument lacks a certain sophistication, a certain je ne sais quoi, know whadda mean Vern?

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to cuckoldmepls)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? - 9/15/2010 1:34:22 PM   
EbonyWood


Posts: 2044
Joined: 7/8/2005
Status: offline
Definitive proof we landed on the moon. NASA keeps these 12 beings in a secret hangar for experimental purposes.
 
Cuck is second from right, center row.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to cuckoldmepls)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? - 9/15/2010 1:42:30 PM   
cuckoldmepls


Posts: 855
Joined: 11/29/2007
Status: offline
Now look at these official nasa photographs claiming that apollo 14 can be spotted. It claims there is a shadow created by the lunar lander, but if you look at everything else in the picture, nothing else has a shadow, and unless the moon is perfectly flat, that doesn't make sense.

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/multimedia/lroimages/apollosites.html

(in reply to EbonyWood)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Did We Really Land On The Moon??? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094