Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: US elections for $1,000.00 please Alec


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: US elections for $1,000.00 please Alec Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: US elections for $1,000.00 please Alec - 9/16/2010 7:49:08 AM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

quote:

First, in sourcing your facts it is incumbent on you to provide quotes, citations, valid links, etc..


yawn. Go watch it. Or not. Find a source that disputes what I said. Or not.
Telling me what/how to post just isn't going to be fruitful.


So, what you are telling me is you can post any unsubstantiated bullshit that you want and you are right until proven wrong.

Good tactic.

I can see the favorable poll numbers on your credibility just going through the roof.



(in reply to truckinslave)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: US elections for $1,000.00 please Alec - 9/16/2010 7:50:59 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
First, try to leave the demeaning comments outside the debate.

Second, none of those things would reflest the desire of either party to win over the other. An unopposed runner would definitely lower voter turn out. Why go vote if only one person is running?

Third, i am addressing both sides. I never stated how many Dems were running unopposed. I asked how many primaries were unopposed. There is a difference.

< Message edited by tazzygirl -- 9/16/2010 7:52:17 AM >


_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to truckinslave)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: US elections for $1,000.00 please Alec - 9/16/2010 7:55:55 AM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
Why go vote if only one person is running?



Maybe things are different in your neck of the woods, Tazzy, but most jurisdictions don't waste an election. There are school boards, water districts, municipal seats, local initiatives. Low turnout is a good indicator of apathy, and, in this election I suspect, despair.

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: US elections for $1,000.00 please Alec - 9/16/2010 8:01:50 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
Im sure there are many issues on many ballots. Could those issues be what is drawing many voters and not the "Tea Party" run?

I see all three coming out with their victory battle cries.... and its still a long election season ahead. Last i heard, the House may be up for grabs, but its a bitter battle in the senate for the GOP.

Has anyone considered what will happen if the majority of forecasts are true? GOP run House? Democratic run Senate? In my opinion, it will finally show the american people where they stand.

I will leave you gentlemen... and others... to figure that one out.

Oh, and something i didnt address. 4.5 million more than what number? That part was never addressed either. 4.5 million more than 4.5 is a huge number. 4.5 million than 100 million... not so much.

< Message edited by tazzygirl -- 9/16/2010 8:03:38 AM >


_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: US elections for $1,000.00 please Alec - 9/16/2010 8:14:43 AM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Oh, and something i didnt address. 4.5 million more than what number? That part was never addressed either.


Unless I missed something, where this number even came from was not addressed.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: US elections for $1,000.00 please Alec - 9/16/2010 8:52:46 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
But its like 1926 all over again, except different and not at all the same, besides being of no relevance since there is no frame of reference.

But, interestingly enough if you look at the situation while laying on your belly, squinting your eyes and faced into the sun, you can almost see something relevant in a tarot card reading sort of way, know what I mean? 

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: US elections for $1,000.00 please Alec - 9/16/2010 9:27:38 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
Oh, and something i didnt address. 4.5 million more than what number? That part was never addressed either. 4.5 million more than 4.5 is a huge number. 4.5 million than 100 million... not so much.


One thing I've been observing of the conservatives on this forum: They hate to answer direct questions with direct answers. If they can dodge, evade, step-aside, while spring forth misdirection, they will.

I asked the question on another thread:

For all you conservatives on this forum, can you declare both:

A) Mr. Obama is a US Citizen
B) Mr. Obama is a Christian

I got only one reply of 'yes', from willbedurdaddy. All the others, ducked the question. And given that its posted here, how many will re-duck the question?


(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: US elections for $1,000.00 please Alec - 9/16/2010 9:33:23 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Heres where the shit hits the fan, and what exactly does a huge republican primary turnout do to us at the legislative level:

Let's go to the turquois column on the abacus for that one  (note before and after the 69th congress)

http://arts.bev.net/roperldavid/politics/congress.htm   (republican president btw)

I guess the world still spins on its axis, but it is getting to look alot like hail mary's and interpreting chicken bones cast haphazardly around the campfire.

Or am I missing some deep underlying thoughtful process and valid analogy here?

Perhaps our wunderkind can waltz me thru the voodoo rites so we can all lift the veil?   You're up at bat for that thousand, Alex.  

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 9/16/2010 9:37:57 AM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: US elections for $1,000.00 please Alec - 9/16/2010 10:03:24 AM   
flcouple2009


Posts: 2784
Joined: 1/8/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Oh, and something i didnt address. 4.5 million more than what number? That part was never addressed either.


Unless I missed something, where this number even came from was not addressed.



It came from Karl Rove, the man who never met a subject or fact he couldn't twist. 

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: US elections for $1,000.00 please Alec - 9/16/2010 11:17:19 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

You could also ask about Dim voter suppression due to the weather, horoscopes, and the cost of tea in China.
I wouldn't give those questions much relevance either.


Oh, no....I am sorry truckinslave ...The correct question is:

What is you could also ask about Retardican voter suppression due to the weather, horoscopes, and the cost of tea in China, as well as what I asked, since they have nothing to do with reality,  I wouldn't give those questions much relevance either?

So...........Having never been a correct questioner in your posting history, we will have to go to to an informed poster to select the next category.

Alex


< Message edited by mnottertail -- 9/16/2010 11:18:58 AM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to truckinslave)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: US elections for $1,000.00 please Alec - 9/16/2010 2:30:03 PM   
Archer


Posts: 3207
Joined: 3/11/2005
Status: offline
joether, while I would normally be perfectly willing to answer those questions, you attitude and spin about how it is conservatives who duck and dodge (implying then that liberals answer all questions in a direct and forthright manner (PPPPPFFfffffffffftttttttt    LOLPOLOLOLOLOLOLO  Pffffffft tttt LOLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLOOLOLLLOLL).




4.5 million more Republicans than Democrats have showed up to the primaries.

The trend has been that Democrats get more people to primaries than Republicans, one could offer dozens of potential reasons for that trend from employment to apathy to less internal strife within one of the parties, and districts that contain huge wide spread populations vs populations that are denser and require less travel to get to a polling place.

What is different this year?
Well the largest most obvious difference is that the Republican primaries have had serious Tea Party candidates in competition for the seats. Incumbancy has been the rule and even with this tea party shift the results will remain high. Less apathy in the Republican party is certainly ONE very large factor in high republican primary numbers.

We'll see how those high primary numbers continue to hold interest when November rolls around. I'm predicting it'll hold a fair bit of that interest. I don;t think the Pelosi House, the Ried Senate and the Obama White House can talk enough to calm the angry masses. Some of those angry masses would be angry masses and would vote against whoever was in power no matter which party.





(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: US elections for $1,000.00 please Alec - 9/16/2010 9:06:06 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
All the others, ducked the question.



Don't assume that just because you post it, anyone bothers to read it.

Of course President Obama is a US citizen, and was born in this country. I consider the birthers as comparable to the people who spent eight years whining that Bush II wasn't really elected President in 2000. Useless, and pretty stupid, in other words.

I accept without question President Obama's statements about his religious persuasion, as I would accept the statement of belief of anyone who I consider coming from a position of good faith.


Speaking of ducked questions, Jo, have you been able to learn WHY there was an election that allowed a Republican into the Kennedy seat? I bet Ron knows.

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 32
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: US elections for $1,000.00 please Alec Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078