RE: Ann Coulter...whoops! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Sanity -> RE: Ann Coulter...whoops! (9/19/2010 7:41:22 AM)


No, I am an asshole. There is a difference.




juliaoceania -> RE: Ann Coulter...whoops! (9/19/2010 7:43:04 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


No, I am an asshole. There is a difference.



No, if the rules around here mean anything you are [awaiting approval]




Sanity -> RE: Ann Coulter...whoops! (9/19/2010 7:49:36 AM)


Thats okay because domitroll would be too. And so would mnottertail, and hippeesphincter.

You use such words because you like being childish and you think they have shock value, but also like a child the only real shock value theu hold is when theyre used on you because most of the rest of us here are adults.

That really goes for domitroll and mnottertail and the rest of you little punk kids as well.


quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

No, if the rules around here mean anything you are [awaiting approval]




juliaoceania -> RE: Ann Coulter...whoops! (9/19/2010 7:50:49 AM)

quote:

Thats okay because domiguy would be too.


He has been moderated, so I guess it is your turn?




Sanity -> RE: Ann Coulter...whoops! (9/19/2010 7:54:48 AM)



I didnt write that you used those words, brainiac.

quote:

ORIGINAL: HippiekinksterYou should have no trouble pointing out where I called anyone a "vile cunt", since your memory seems to be so sharp in this case.





Jeffff -> RE: Ann Coulter...whoops! (9/19/2010 9:21:23 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


No, I am an asshole. There is a difference.



I didn't know that 6 months ago................




Sanity -> RE: Ann Coulter...whoops! (9/19/2010 10:05:17 AM)


Your recollection is very dim.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

So you're both then? I remember seeing you complain about the Palin bashing while giving Michelle Obama a hard time...




tazzygirl -> RE: Ann Coulter...whoops! (9/19/2010 10:30:11 AM)

Ok, i got caught up... lol... and found!

Thanks Lucy!




Lucylastic -> RE: Ann Coulter...whoops! (9/19/2010 10:33:52 AM)

yep my bad, it was thornhappy, I apologise to both the ladies, being Thornyhappy and poor Tazzy
I was sleepy when I wrote that.




tazzygirl -> RE: Ann Coulter...whoops! (9/19/2010 10:41:30 AM)

Oh its all good, Lucy, I fixed my post. But, in all honesty, i cant understand why sanity isnt just on everyone's ignore by now. Im sure the Mods will be along soon enough, especially since his post has been reported. But, i personally find his recent posts to be nothing but argumentative and petty.




Sanity -> RE: Ann Coulter...whoops! (9/19/2010 10:43:25 AM)


There are reasons Im not on everyones ignore list taz. [:D]

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Oh its all good, Lucy, I fixed my post. But, in all honesty, i cant understand why sanity isnt just on everyone's ignore by now. Im sure the Mods will be along soon enough, especially since his post has been reported. But, i personally find his recent posts to be nothing but argumentative and petty.




juliaoceania -> RE: Ann Coulter...whoops! (9/19/2010 10:48:28 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Oh its all good, Lucy, I fixed my post. But, in all honesty, i cant understand why sanity isnt just on everyone's ignore by now. Im sure the Mods will be along soon enough, especially since his post has been reported. But, i personally find his recent posts to be nothing but argumentative and petty.


I do not have anyone on ignore, but if I ever change that policy, he would be the first one I block, putting up with his irrational posts has frustrated me in the past... trying to explain simple concepts to him is all but impossible




flcouple2009 -> RE: Ann Coulter...whoops! (9/19/2010 11:05:29 AM)

Julia,

The funny part is dear old Sanity often responds to people he claims to have on ignore.  I guess when you tell so many lies it can be hard to keep them straight.




Sanity -> RE: Ann Coulter...whoops! (9/19/2010 11:08:45 AM)


I dont claim to  have anyone on ignore at the moment, though I never read everyones posts. I have had people on ignore, but so what.




flcouple2009 -> RE: Ann Coulter...whoops! (9/19/2010 11:28:34 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


I dont claim to  have anyone on ignore at the moment, though I never read everyones posts. I have had people on ignore, but so what.


Yes, I know you have internet alzheimer's. 

What do I know as I am stuck a phone booth,  [:)].

I knew Idaho was behind the rest of the country but since the rest of us have trouble even locating a pay phone it is amazing you still have phone booths.




Sanity -> RE: Ann Coulter...whoops! (9/19/2010 11:32:51 AM)


Could this thread be next?

"whoops!"  [:D]




Aynne88 -> RE: Ann Coulter...whoops! (9/19/2010 11:44:56 AM)

Seriously how can he be calling people cunts, mocking the fact he isn't modded, and still here??  Amazing.

Oh and Sanity in case you pull out the old tired lame argument that someone called a PUBLIC figure a cunt, let me slowwwwwly explain. Personal ad hominen attacks on fellow posters is vastly different than slinging insuts at public and/or famous figures that you do *not* interact with directly. 

The last time I said anything to you publicly here that resulted in you being pissed at me I got a really heinous rude cmail from you, so before you do  that again, save the time, it will be deleted unread. 




slvemike4u -> RE: Ann Coulter...whoops! (9/19/2010 11:45:01 AM)

And as I said you're not in my league.....tho I am willing to entertain the theory that you are a fearie [:)]




KatyLied -> RE: Ann Coulter...whoops! (9/19/2010 11:48:53 AM)

quote:

Could this thread be next?

"whoops!"


most likely




Sanity -> RE: Ann Coulter...whoops! (9/19/2010 11:49:39 AM)


Dont flatter yourself dear, Ive never cmailed you and this path is very well worn already, youre not presenting anything new except for your lie.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aynne88

Seriously how can he be calling people cunts, mocking the fact he isn't modded, and still here??  Amazing.

Oh and Sanity in case you pull out the old tired lame argument that someone called a PUBLIC figure a cunt, let me slowwwwwly explain. Personal ad hominen attacks on fellow posters is vastly different than slinging insuts at public and/or famous figures that you do *not* interact with directly. 

The last time I said anything to you publicly here that resulted in you being pissed at me I got a really heinous rude cmail from you, so before you do  that again, save the time, it will be deleted unread. 




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875