RE: Rush and Wiki

RE: Rush and Wiki (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

thishereboi -> RE: Rush and Wiki (9/19/2010 4:08:27 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: luckydawg Well, an important democrat Politician once refered to there being 57 states. I mean what could be stupider than that. Not noticing 31 days in June, compared to 57 states. You don't get it, do you? If someone else makes a mistake, it is just that, a mistake. If Rush makes a mistake, it's because he is soooooo stupid and people will spend days, if not weeks talking about it.

luckydawg -> RE: Rush and Wiki (9/19/2010 4:08:42 PM)
You can be just as witty as jon stewart, if ya keep trying.

juliaoceania -> RE: Rush and Wiki (9/19/2010 4:11:13 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thishereboi quote: ORIGINAL: luckydawg Well, an important democrat Politician once refered to there being 57 states. I mean what could be stupider than that. Not noticing 31 days in June, compared to 57 states. You don't get it, do you? If someone else makes a mistake, it is just that, a mistake. If Rush makes a mistake, it's because he is soooooo stupid and people will spend days, if not weeks talking about it. Quoting wikipedia is not a mistake, it is an intentional decision

juliaoceania -> RE: Rush and Wiki (9/19/2010 4:12:35 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: luckydawg You can be just as witty as jon stewart, if ya keep trying. Whereas, you will never be

luckydawg -> RE: Rush and Wiki (9/19/2010 4:30:40 PM)
make it about me. Your chrush on me is so cute. You always bring it back to me. and everone can see it is because you lost the argument.

juliaoceania -> RE: Rush and Wiki (9/19/2010 4:33:29 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: luckydawg make it about me. Your chrush on me is so cute. You always bring it back to me. and everone can see it is because you lost the argument. You know, you sound just like Sanity when you accuse me of having a crush on you... makes ya wonder, do you guys share a brain cell, or are you the same person It is rather amusing that you can dish out the insults, but you are really rather poor sported about having them thrust back at you, another trait you share with other right wing posters[8\|]

flcouple2009 -> RE: Rush and Wiki (9/19/2010 4:38:58 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thishereboi You don't get it, do you? If someone else makes a mistake, it is just that, a mistake. If Rush makes a mistake, it's because he is soooooo stupid and people will spend days, if not weeks talking about it. Yes one of us doesn't get it. News, "entertainers" who have audiences who take every word they say as news, even people who just refer to themselves in the business as commentators have a different standard. Not checking your facts before you say something is not a mistake, it's a fatal error. It is a blatant disregard for anything resembling ethics. So much for the "excellence in broadcasting". Berating people for citing wiki and then turning around and getting caught quoting false information from wiki, that's stupid.

luckydawg -> RE: Rush and Wiki (9/19/2010 4:41:47 PM)
Still, all about me. I guess having a crippled daddy makes a girl's thoughts start to stray Shoots, I can insult with the best of em. But I toss an insult in with a political statement ususally. Unlike a lot of the fat pasty democratics do.

luckydawg -> RE: Rush and Wiki (9/19/2010 4:43:26 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: flcouple2009 quote: ORIGINAL: thishereboi You don't get it, do you? If someone else makes a mistake, it is just that, a mistake. If Rush makes a mistake, it's because he is soooooo stupid and people will spend days, if not weeks talking about it. Yes one of us doesn't get it. News, "entertainers" who have audiences who take every word they say as news, even people who just refer to themselves in the business as commentators have a different standard. Not checking your facts before you say something is not a mistake, it's a fatal error. It is a blatant disregard for anything resembling ethics. So much for the "excellence in broadcasting". Berating people for citing wiki and then turning around and getting caught quoting false information from wiki, that's stupid. So then you consider Dan Rather and CBS news to be without ethics?

thishereboi -> RE: Rush and Wiki (9/19/2010 4:44:54 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: flcouple2009 quote: ORIGINAL: thishereboi You don't get it, do you? If someone else makes a mistake, it is just that, a mistake. If Rush makes a mistake, it's because he is soooooo stupid and people will spend days, if not weeks talking about it. Yes one of us doesn't get it. News, "entertainers" who have audiences who take every word they say as news, even people who just refer to themselves in the business as commentators have a different standard. Not checking your facts before you say something is not a mistake, it's a fatal error. It is a blatant disregard for anything resembling ethics. So much for the "excellence in broadcasting". Berating people for citing wiki and then turning around and getting caught quoting false information from wiki, that's stupid. Then what do you call it when a news station gets their facts wrong? http://www.mediaite.com/online/olympian-mistake-nbc-confuses-michael-j-fox-with-terry-fox/ I don't remember anyone starting a thread talking about what assholes they were for stating facts that weren't.

juliaoceania -> RE: Rush and Wiki (9/19/2010 4:47:48 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: luckydawg Still, all about me. I guess having a crippled daddy makes a girl's thoughts start to stray Shoots, I can insult with the best of em. But I toss an insult in with a political statement ususally. Unlike a lot of the fat pasty democratics do. I don't have a "daddy", and still you accuse me of making it personal, when you are the one doing so by bringing up my love life...You are the one that insulted flcouple over Jon Stewart and then you twist it to be about insulting you... fucking hilarious Wow, you truly take the cake, dude...

flcouple2009 -> RE: Rush and Wiki (9/19/2010 4:47:50 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: luckydawg So then you consider Dan Rather and CBS news to be without ethics? In the instance you are referring to yes. That was a complete ethical failing on Rather's part and a complete disregard for journalistic integrity. Too many organizations have become consumed with being the first one to report rather than the proper fact checking required to confirm a story.

thornhappy -> RE: Rush and Wiki (9/19/2010 4:53:56 PM)
Generally he gets steamed if people don't call him a journalist, but if his whoppers are pointed out he declares that he's just an entertainer. I've known a lot of folks that believe every word he (and Reilly, Beck, Boortz, etc.) says. quote: ORIGINAL: flcouple2009 DS, I understand perfectly. Rush is about making Rush money. If the facts get in the way they're not needed. My problem is that this sloppy fact checking and in some cases just making up what you wish happens over and over with many of the right wing "entertainers". The problem being that their audiences take everything they say as gospel. Then they run around spreading the misinformation and using it to base their choices on.

thornhappy -> RE: Rush and Wiki (9/19/2010 4:56:37 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: luckydawg sad fat pasty white folks. In the summer or the winter? Is that why people got up in arms about the tanning tax? So Republicans couldn't be tan to distinguish themselves from Democrats? [:D] (at least they won't be prone to skin cancer!)

Hippiekinkster -> RE: Rush and Wiki (9/19/2010 5:02:15 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thishereboi quote: ORIGINAL: luckydawg Well, an important democrat Politician once refered to there being 57 states. I mean what could be stupider than that. Not noticing 31 days in June, compared to 57 states. You don't get it, do you? If someone else makes a mistake, it is just that, a mistake. If Rush makes a mistake, it's because he is soooooo stupid and people will spend days, if not weeks talking about it. So much for "Excellence in Broadcasting", eh? Heh, FLcouple beat me to it. [8D]

flcouple2009 -> RE: Rush and Wiki (9/19/2010 5:27:30 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thishereboi Then what do you call it when a news station gets their facts wrong? http://www.mediaite.com/online/olympian-mistake-nbc-confuses-michael-j-fox-with-terry-fox/ I don't remember anyone starting a thread talking about what assholes they were for stating facts that weren't. That was what it was, stupid. Somebody mixed up their Fox's and didn't bother to make sure they were correct. That should have earned someone a pink slip.

Lucylastic -> RE: Rush and Wiki (9/19/2010 5:38:25 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thishereboi You don't get it, do you? If someone else makes a mistake, it is just that, a mistake. If Rush makes a mistake, it's because he is soooooo stupid and people will spend days, if not weeks talking about it. Considering the thread was only started today, I think Rush has about till the end of november to take the shit for his tiny weenie screw up good gawd talk about exaggeration Fixed for Hippie, LOL oopth

Hippiekinkster -> RE: Rush and Wiki (9/19/2010 5:47:42 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote: ORIGINAL: Hippiekinkster quote: ORIGINAL: thishereboi You don't get it, do you? If someone else makes a mistake, it is just that, a mistake. If Rush makes a mistake, it's because he is soooooo stupid and people will spend days, if not weeks talking about it. Considering the thread was only started today, I think Rush has about till the end of november to take the shit for his tiny weenie screw up good gawd talk about exageration Fix your quotes, woman.

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875