quote:

I'm not split into two separate identities and the majority of the above applies in my long-lived relationship with M. The opposites are just what I'm capable of in a suitable situation.

It's not in the least bit a dual life, anymore than being *very illogical and emotional* and also being *very logical and pragmatic* and I'm capable of both. We're capable of embracing the extremes of each other, that's all.

They're quite bald statements , not witnessed in the context of a relationship or in the context of a whole person.

Who's to say if we have a healthy M/s situation? It's fine for us but wouldn't suit plenty of other people.

quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy


I saw a profile that stated:

Let's start with the main points:
- You should be intelligent but want to be treated like a mindless fucktoy.
- You should be extreme but discreet.
- You should be classy but not above being used as a human urinal.
- You should be attractive but not expect to be treated as such.
- You should long to please but not expect it to be reciprocated.
- You should be independent but want to be owned.

If you are these things, perhaps you can be my property.

--------

What is your take on these contradictions? As weird as it is, there is some truth in the absurdities here -- at least on a short term basis. LT my view slides towards "no way" and "unworkable."

How much can a person be split into two separate and distinct identities? How would such a duel life affect a someone?

Is all of the above just fantasy projection?

Does this describe a healthy BDSM situation?

Let's hear you take!!

quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy
What is your take on these contradictions? As weird as it is, there is some truth in the absurdities here -- at least on a short term basis. LT my view slides towards "no way" and "unworkable."

How much can a person be split into two separate and distinct identities? How would such a duel life affect a someone?

Is all of the above just fantasy projection?

Does this describe a healthy BDSM situation?