darq
Posts: 443
Joined: 4/21/2006 From: under a rock Status: offline
|
The thing is, for every financial dominant who demands the money, there are at least 10 submissives salivating at the thought of being so used, so controlled, that even their wallet is open to the dominant's desires. The entire point of submitting to a financial dominant, is knowing that the only reason they're having anything to do with you is your money. Its like a person with an extreme foot fetish ... Only, its money ... Instead of feet. I dont care for the hateful attitude people get towards pro dominants or financial dominants. I used to work as a financial dominant. I didnt become rich ... I ended up quitting because the submissives who approached me always wanted to be treated like crap. They didnt want respect or caring or any sort of humanity whatsoever. They wanted to be used up, to be berated and humiliated and then ordered to give over their credit cards and take me on a shopping spree. I couldnt get into it personally and it showed ... The original question kind of offended me. It makes about as much sense as saying "Can bedroom only submissives actually call themselves submissive?" Financial domination is just another form of fetish play ... Just because its not YOUR fetish, doesnt mean its any less kinky or less real.
|