TheHeretic
Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007 From: California, USA Status: offline
|
You know, RML, if you have these urges and desires still plaguing you this late in life, you really ought to step up and act on them. I'm not going to be able to help you out with that part, but I'll take your inability to get the image out of your mind as a compliment. Anyway, back to the actual topic, and the interesting questions. quote:
ORIGINAL: tazzygirl What constitutes preventative health care? Do you consider health an individual problem or a community problem, or both? That's going to be a "both" from me, Tazzy, and it goes to preventative care as well. Community preventative health care starts with things like a source of clean water, and somewhere for the poo to go, and not letting that be the same place. Got a full scale urban environment? The trash needs to go away on a very reliable schedule. Got restaurants? Better get a health code, and some inspectors to go with it. Vaccinations are in the grey area (and not an invitation to hijack, I hope), but they are in the public interest. When it comes to stopping the spread of infectious disease, and disease vectors, I'm not above a little individual coercion for the greater good. For the individual adult, who presumably survived childhood because of the innoculations he had to have, preventative health care should be about information and choices. There is no perfect answer, because every one us is going to die anyway. A critical bit of that information is going to be family history. If someone knows, just for example, that the previous generations of his/her family either died quickly of massive heart attacks, horribly from organ cancers, or after years of shitting the bed dementia, that person's informed decision about bacon double cheeseburgers might not be the same as everyone else. This ties in to one of my own hesitations about a nationalized healthcare system, and what it could become. It's somewhere between cynicism and slight paranoia. Call it the 1984 factor. (I was way too young when I read that book.) The idea that the most common, personal, day to day and lifestyle choices of individuals become part of the government's cost/benefit analysis isn't one that sits easy with me. I'm not 100% ok with seat belt laws, Tazzy, increased gov't interest in whether people eat their vegetables probably isn't going to go well with me either. I see an important part of this debate as social cost vs. social cost.
_____________________________
If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced. That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.
|