RE: Flu Shot -- shall i or shall i not (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


ThundersCry -> RE: Flu Shot -- shall i or shall i not (10/1/2010 10:30:08 AM)

I get them every year since I was 32...
Never had any problems...
All they are good for is that IF you get the flu...you don`t get as sick is my understanding...




MercTech -> RE: Flu Shot -- shall i or shall i not (10/1/2010 1:00:45 PM)

Point 1> With any vaccine, a certain percentage of the population will get an adverse reaction. Yes, you can get flu symptoms and feel ill from a flu vaccine but it is a low percentage of the population that will have such a reaction. Such reactions to the flu vaccine can be severe if you are allergic to eggs.

Point 2> The H1N1 is an ass kicker. I had it last fall and it was two months before I was fully back up to speed. And as a side effect, I developed an addiction to World of Warcraft. Hey, what do you do with you get out of breath and exhausted after being on your feet for half an hour? Better to feel a bit ill for a few days or a week than be ill for a month or more with a full blown case of one of the virulent viruses.

Yes, I've gotten the flu shot this year. It had me so grouchy and achy for three days that I was ready to bit the head off of hampsters. I do tend to react to viral vaccines but it is better than the alternative.

Stefan





BoredAsHell -> RE: Flu Shot -- shall i or shall i not (10/1/2010 3:07:57 PM)

flu shot for me thanks, i've been sick enough over the last three years, don't feel like risking something like that. i spent over a year fighting the infection in my leg after that surgery and ended up losing it anyway, this one is something i can prevent, i'm going for it.




Aynne88 -> RE: Flu Shot -- shall i or shall i not (10/1/2010 3:52:31 PM)

I always get one I have lupus and my immune system is compromised. My mom is an RN and she does it for me, and my Man has diabetes so he gets one as well. This year we got it then went to lunch, never have I felt sick or any repercussions from it. I do not want to get the flu and since I got the shot (over ten years) I haven't. I highly recommend it for anyone.




TrollovHumanity -> RE: Flu Shot -- shall i or shall i not (10/2/2010 6:28:12 AM)

Whenever I get the flu I like testing myself whether or not I survive.

The flu bug keeps getting stronger BECAUSE PEOPLE KEEP GETTING FLU SHOTS!




MrRodgers -> RE: Flu Shot -- shall i or shall i not (10/2/2010 8:28:17 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thornhappy

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
Read the above...$Billions later....where is the pandemic ?

H1N1 is a pandemic.  It's all over the world now.  It spread rapidly.

Remember when the breakout occured in Mexico, there were a lot of fatalities.  Based on those deaths, and some of the early ones in the US, there was a fear that this was going to be 1918 all over again.  It had some of the same traits, attacking the young adults...and pregnant women.  That's what drove the vaccine development.

I've seen regular flu so bad in SoCal that LA was having to push patients to OC, and OC was pushing theirs to San Diego.  Elective surgeries were cancelled due to a lack of bed space and ill hospital staff.  It doesn't take an H1 flu to hammer a population.

I have asthma and would get a flu and the pneumonia vaccine soon but can't until December at the earliest.

ALL of you read these...and weep. All of those flus since 1918 hadn't ever been judged a pandemic and had cause death world-wide.

Here, Here too

After 29 days of exposure and 8 days of hype, in Mexico there were 12 confirmed deaths...not 1000's. It in fact did not 'spread' as fast as others had. The manufactured panic spread faster than the virus, to stoke fear and have govt. waste $Billions.

No more people died and in fact from other flu than those confirmed as dying from H1N1 or swine. Flu of many kinds are 'all over the world' and are causing deaths but they are NOT called a pandemic. They didn't stoke fear and a new vaccine in 3 days, exempt from testing and liability.

In Mexico the WHO examined one case on one person nearby a large chicken farm where they did no investigation to see if desease could have originated there. They then hyped the case as H1N1 avian or swine flu.

I guess...whatever needs a boost in sales...pick one.




angelikaJ -> RE: Flu Shot -- shall i or shall i not (10/2/2010 9:50:48 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

quote:

ORIGINAL: thornhappy

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
Read the above...$Billions later....where is the pandemic ?

H1N1 is a pandemic.  It's all over the world now.  It spread rapidly.

Remember when the breakout occured in Mexico, there were a lot of fatalities.  Based on those deaths, and some of the early ones in the US, there was a fear that this was going to be 1918 all over again.  It had some of the same traits, attacking the young adults...and pregnant women.  That's what drove the vaccine development.

I've seen regular flu so bad in SoCal that LA was having to push patients to OC, and OC was pushing theirs to San Diego.  Elective surgeries were cancelled due to a lack of bed space and ill hospital staff.  It doesn't take an H1 flu to hammer a population.

I have asthma and would get a flu and the pneumonia vaccine soon but can't until December at the earliest.

ALL of you read these...and weep. All of those flus since 1918 hadn't ever been judged a pandemic and had cause death world-wide.




Again, as mentioned before, you already acknowledged that we have had other pandemics:

In 1957-58 The Asian Flu killed 2,000,000. 11 years later, 1968-1969 The Hong Kong Flu struck killing one million.

Those are pandemics!




SL4V3M4YB3 -> RE: Flu Shot -- shall i or shall i not (10/2/2010 10:03:40 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TrollovHumanity
Whenever I get the flu I like testing myself whether or not I survive.

Strange hobby, I'm usually more concerned with keeping the contents of my nose from dripping out.

I think it's the overuse of antibiotics which is the real problem.

The flue doesn't get stronger just some strains of it die out to be replaced with others. This would happen regardless of if people were getting vaccinated or not. We should not even think of colds and the flu as being one virus, it never has been. This is why you can never cure the cold or wipe it out because there are too many version of the same thing.




sexyred1 -> RE: Flu Shot -- shall i or shall i not (10/2/2010 11:00:17 AM)

I always get a flu shot, everyone I know who does NOT get the shot, had the flu.
Your arm is a bit sore after, but believe me, you should get it.




peppermint -> RE: Flu Shot -- shall i or shall i not (10/2/2010 11:12:03 AM)

Fast Reply

I will get the flu shot.  Last time I missed one I spent 5 days in the hospital with pneumonia and have lung damage.  Gary got a lung transplant over 9 years ago.  He can't afford to get the flu any more than I can afford to get it.  We'll both get our shots to protect ourselves and each other. 




Caius -> RE: Flu Shot -- shall i or shall i not (10/2/2010 1:44:12 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

quote:

ORIGINAL: thornhappy

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
Read the above...$Billions later....where is the pandemic ?

H1N1 is a pandemic.  It's all over the world now.  It spread rapidly.

Remember when the breakout occured in Mexico, there were a lot of fatalities.  Based on those deaths, and some of the early ones in the US, there was a fear that this was going to be 1918 all over again.  It had some of the same traits, attacking the young adults...and pregnant women.  That's what drove the vaccine development.

I've seen regular flu so bad in SoCal that LA was having to push patients to OC, and OC was pushing theirs to San Diego.  Elective surgeries were cancelled due to a lack of bed space and ill hospital staff.  It doesn't take an H1 flu to hammer a population.

I have asthma and would get a flu and the pneumonia vaccine soon but can't until December at the earliest.

ALL of you read these...and weep. All of those flus since 1918 hadn't ever been judged a pandemic and had cause death world-wide.

Here, Here too



LMAO, seriously, these are the articles you want to use to support your argument here?  The first is a bizarre, semi-intelligible conspiracy theory that couldn't be more asinine and cliche if it tried to tie-in with a dual premise that the illuminati killed JFK to cover up the faking of the lunar landing.  The thing is so goofy I'd almost think it were a joke -- a caricature of the position you are espousing -- if not for the convoluted and confused, almost stream of consciousness nature of the narrative so typical conspiracy theories.  Seriously, how can you not understand that if you want to win people over to your stance that we should be skeptical about the motives of pharmaceutical companies (not in itself a ridiculous argument) that you need to avoid citing the likes of this:

" The forged “Knights of Malta” list was used by journalist Benjamin Fulford, a Canadian working in Japan, linked to the “‘Black Dragon Society,’ which, folks, in case you didn’t know, are JAPANESE ASSASSINS [emphasis in original, lol],” Harle protested after receiving Fulford’s death threat. "

The second article is from what seems to be a site dedicated to a hyperbolic and one-dimensional exaltation of homeopathic medicine and all-natural supplements and a corresponding demonization of conventional treatments. Because nothing makes your point about the need to be skeptical about an industry better than unhesitatingly jumping onboard with the opinions of their competitors.  And seriously, you want to talk about snake-oil and scare tactics? No other source even approaches the homeopathic cures movement in either regard.

You are right about one thing though -- those links do have me weeping a little, but mostly as the result of laughter and just a little out of pity for the lunatic fringe.


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

After 29 days of exposure and 8 days of hype, in Mexico there were 12 confirmed deaths...not 1000's. It in fact did not 'spread' as fast as others had. The manufactured panic spread faster than the virus, to stoke fear and have govt. waste $Billions.

No more people died and in fact from other flu than those confirmed as dying from H1N1 or swine. Flu of many kinds are 'all over the world' and are causing deaths but they are NOT called a pandemic. They didn't stoke fear and a new vaccine in 3 days, exempt from testing and liability.

In Mexico the WHO examined one case on one person nearby a large chicken farm where they did no investigation to see if desease could have originated there. They then hyped the case as H1N1 avian or swine flu.

I guess...whatever needs a boost in sales...pick one.



Utter and complete bullshit.  There were nearly 400 deaths in Mexico that were confirmed results of H1N1.  And this number is dwarfed by the 3, 500 deaths suspected to be a result of the strain in the U.S. and the perhaps 15, 000 worldwide.  The vaccine was not released inside three days, it was developed over the course of months.  Do you have any idea how technically infeasible it is to develop a vaccine in three days?

All of which is rather besides the point.  The fact of the matter is, when you are dealing with a highly virulent pathogen, you don't have the luxury of waiting around to find out of it's really got worldwide pandemic potential if you are tasked with safeguarding public health.  You do everything in your power to stop its spread. And maybe, if you do your job right, and are really lucky, you manage to contain it to a significant it so successfully that people question what the whole scare was about in the first place conspiracy nuts get to villanize you for being a fear-monger.  Of course, if you're unlucky and it does spread to such a degree that no one can deny the reality of its threat, those same people will be going off about how you let the disease spread (or manufactured it yourself) so that you could sell as much of the vaccine as possible.  And yes, of course these things do tend to get blown out of proportion in the popular media, but that's what the media does best, capitalize on whatever grabs attention most immediately, it doesn't mean they are in the pocket of/deviously conspiring with the actors in that day's particular drama.  And again, we like to find fault with them for going overboard, but how much more pissed would we be if they didn't send up the alarm and truly devastating catastrophe was the result?

Now I caution you with regard to your response here.  Remember, with my opposition to the obvious truth, I could very well be in on the conspiracy and, if so, I have access to yakuza assassins!




barelynangel -> RE: Flu Shot -- shall i or shall i not (10/2/2010 4:59:06 PM)

Hi all who answered the OP, i appreciate your posts.  I am still debating.

Thanks for your reasonings, angel




Aileen1968 -> RE: Flu Shot -- shall i or shall i not (10/2/2010 5:04:54 PM)

I got the flu shot only once. Less than a month later I got the flu and it was the worst case I've ever had.
I will never get the shot again.
I get the flu probably about every other year. It's never that bad for me.
I personally think that every time our bodies get exposed, we build up a stronger resistance.
I have no clue how accurate that is, but it's worked well for me so far.




wittynamehere -> RE: Flu Shot -- shall i or shall i not (10/2/2010 5:29:59 PM)

I'm very well educated on all sides of the vaccine issue, and I for one will NEVER let them put that stuff in me or my family. My 2c.




pahunkboy -> RE: Flu Shot -- shall i or shall i not (10/3/2010 9:47:19 AM)

I have the right to the least effective dose.


Which for flu shots means   0.





Toppingfrmbottom -> RE: Flu Shot -- shall i or shall i not (10/3/2010 11:55:03 AM)

I've spoken on this a few times before. I don't believe in them. In fact I refuse to get one and I am not sick, not once, my mom who on the other hand is very faith ful about her flue shots,gets sick as a dog 4 or 5 times a winter.  My dad, who also gets his flue shot, also gets sick, though no where as extream as my mom it would seem.
quote:

ORIGINAL: barelynangel

I was wondering what people consider pros and cons of the flu shot based upon their experience?







HK47 -> RE: Flu Shot -- shall i or shall i not (10/3/2010 12:22:17 PM)

I'll take the flu & the pneumonia vaccine. Those who wish to spend time with me should do the same.

Preexisting medical conditions made the decisions for me, along with a corresponding love of life.




Musicmystery -> RE: Flu Shot -- shall i or shall i not (10/3/2010 12:41:49 PM)

quote:

I was wondering what people consider pros and cons of the flu shot


I go with my doctor's recommendation.

After all, he knows best the changing conditions/variables of my health/situation, and if I didn't think so, I'd change doctors.




pahunkboy -> RE: Flu Shot -- shall i or shall i not (10/3/2010 2:08:23 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Toppingfrmbottom

I've spoken on this a few times before. I don't believe in them. In fact I refuse to get one and I am not sick, not once, my mom who on the other hand is very faith ful about her flue shots,gets sick as a dog 4 or 5 times a winter.  My dad, who also gets his flue shot, also gets sick, though no where as extream as my mom it would seem.
quote:

ORIGINAL: barelynangel

I was wondering what people consider pros and cons of the flu shot based upon their experience?







Top, that is EXACTLY how it works.   Thanks so much for this post.   It sums up the thread nicely.




MsConception -> RE: Flu Shot -- shall i or shall i not (10/3/2010 3:26:39 PM)

The two times I have taken the flu shot, I came down with the flu. The flu was not a result of the flue shot, just a bad guess as to the prevelant strains those years. The flu shot is a crap shoot at best. Yes, I absolutely agree that if you are in one of the high risk groups, you should get one. I choose not to get them.

I am a firm believer that to the extent that you are healthy and have a healthy immune system, being exposed to the bug is better in the long run. When the mutated version comes along, you may still get sick, but not as sick as long, since your immune system will "sort of" recognize it. The vaccine does not cause the flu to get stronger, as one poster suggested, however, it may have the result of someone getting sicker when the variant comes around, since they weren't fully exposed to the living virus the first time. More research needs to be done on how those that have had the flu shot react to variants.

I have seen lots of posts on here addressing the pneumonia vaccine. What most people don't understand is that it addresses ONE type of viral pneumonia. There are over 100 bacteria/fungi/viruses that can cause pneumonia. My Dr just shook his head when I told him the discussion I had with the hospital last year when I was being released after a bout with bacterial pneumonia, and they wanted to give me a pneumonia vaccine.

Now, if you want to get into a discussion about over use of antibiotics.....but that would be for a different thread.

As far as the swine flu not being pandemic, that is malarky. I teach highschool, and several districts in my area had to close for a couple of days at one point last year because of the swine flu. So many teachers, substitutes, and students out with H1N1 schools were closed.

So, I do not take either the flu or the pneumonia vaccines.





Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625