Palin gets protective order against 'stalker'

Palin gets protective order against 'stalker' (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

pahunkboy -> Palin gets protective order against 'stalker' (9/29/2010 4:55:14 PM)
http://www.frontiersman.com/articles/2010/09/30/breaking_news/doc4ca235e0bf331043209185.txt Sarah Palin obtained a protective order Monday against an 18-year-old Pennsylvania man who sent her receipts from a gun purchase, along with a letter saying “he tried to follow the Bible but had evil and wickedness in him.” Palin, 46, filed the request in Anchorage District Court against Shawn R. Christy, a man she says began stalking her by e-mail and phone since the summer of 2009. Palin’s friend, Kristan Cole, 48, filed for and received a similar protective order against Christy./snip What a nut!!!

DomKen -> RE: Palin gets protective order against 'stalker' (9/29/2010 4:58:44 PM)
<snark? Sounds like a good christian pursuing his second amendment remedies. </snark>

rulemylife -> RE: Palin gets protective order against 'stalker' (9/29/2010 7:13:11 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: pahunkboy What a nut!!! Which one?

Moonhead -> RE: Palin gets protective order against 'stalker' (9/30/2010 3:32:01 AM)
Anybody heard from DmYngBlk lately?

rulemylife -> RE: Palin gets protective order against 'stalker' (9/30/2010 3:35:14 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Moonhead Anybody heard from DmYngBlk lately? [sm=biggrin.gif] I was thinking the exact same thing.

servantforuse -> RE: Palin gets protective order against 'stalker' (9/30/2010 5:15:56 AM)
I wonder why Nancy Pelosi never needed a protective order ?

rulemylife -> RE: Palin gets protective order against 'stalker' (9/30/2010 5:26:04 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: servantforuse I wonder why Nancy Pelosi never needed a protective order ? Because she is not a mindless bimbo? Was that right? Do I win a prize?

Hillwilliam -> RE: Palin gets protective order against 'stalker' (9/30/2010 5:37:04 AM)
Pelisi is pretty much batchit crazy too. Just the other way from Palin. If the Dems had any sense a couple of years ago, they would have picked a speaker that was a bit more centrist.

Hillwilliam -> RE: Palin gets protective order against 'stalker' (9/30/2010 5:38:21 AM)
Pelosi is pretty much batchit crazy too. Just the other way from Palin. If the Dems had any sense a couple of years ago, they would have picked a speaker that was a bit more centrist.

rulemylife -> RE: Palin gets protective order against 'stalker' (9/30/2010 6:29:22 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam Pelosi is pretty much batchit crazy too. Just the other way from Palin. If the Dems had any sense a couple of years ago, they would have picked a speaker that was a bit more centrist. Deja vu.

Owner59 -> RE: Palin gets protective order against 'stalker' (9/30/2010 6:58:24 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: servantforuse I wonder why Nancy Pelosi never needed a protective order ? Her fans don`t have "evil" in them?[:D]

Moonhead -> RE: Palin gets protective order against 'stalker' (9/30/2010 7:16:41 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam Pelosi is pretty much batchit crazy too. Just the other way from Palin. If the Dems had any sense a couple of years ago, they would have picked a speaker that was a bit more centrist. They did, surely? She's a lot more centrist than Gingrinch (which isn't exactly difficult, to be fair...)

LanceHughes -> RE: Palin gets protective order against 'stalker' (9/30/2010 7:17:00 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: servantforuse I wonder why Nancy Pelosi never needed a protective order ? As Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi has full Secret Service protection. If someone tried to make such a threat against her, 1) she would have never seen it and 2) that person would have been "visited" by the Secret Service (if not arrested) almost immediately. Palin is (under the law, technically) a private person, but is news-worthy, hence the report of her filing for an order. If y'all would just THINK instead of posting your predictable, mind-less, knee-jerk reactions, this thread would've never been started AND this forum would be a better place to visit! [Defensive shields: UP!]

Owner59 -> RE: Palin gets protective order against 'stalker' (9/30/2010 7:23:14 AM)
I imagine many law makers gets threats of every kind.Most not serious.The SS must spend countless man hours following up and designating who`s potentially serious and who`s not.

pahunkboy -> RE: Palin gets protective order against 'stalker' (9/30/2010 7:28:20 AM)
A person tho would be crazy to ask for that kind of trouble. Lets suppose- a person dies a hero. BIG DEAL. So one has everything to lose- and almost nothing to gain.

joether -> RE: Palin gets protective order against 'stalker' (9/30/2010 10:12:46 AM)
I think its just a hypocrit in the spot light. As a leader or sorts, for the Tea Party, she has been bashing the concept of 'big goverment' for months. Now, she goes to that 'big goverment', to protect her from one stalker, who could be anywhere in the country. A small goverment would have had an increbibly hard time locating the guy. So yes, the 'big' and 'evil' goverment is protecting Sarah Palin. And will it get any 'thanks' for the effort? Course not! Where is her army of Tea Party members with their guns? Doesn't Sarah also have a shotgun?

mnottertail -> RE: Palin gets protective order against 'stalker' (9/30/2010 10:14:04 AM)
gonna take a pretty good rifle to bring down a moose.

pahunkboy -> RE: Palin gets protective order against 'stalker' (9/30/2010 10:19:34 AM)
- not many 18 year olds have the cash to go from PA to Alaska. Heck- not many on this board could afford to go to Alaska.

mnottertail -> RE: Palin gets protective order against 'stalker' (9/30/2010 10:22:25 AM)
The toll can't be much on the bridge to nowhere.

Moonhead -> RE: Palin gets protective order against 'stalker' (9/30/2010 10:28:51 AM)
Not many on this board would want to go to Alaska, mate.

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125