RE: ANOTHER College Denies Christine O'Donnell Attended Despite Her Claim (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


willbeurdaddy -> RE: ANOTHER College Denies Christine O'Donnell Attended Despite Her Claim (10/1/2010 10:06:34 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead


quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy
Popeye is right

Not an expression you'll see in here a lot...


Dont presume Popeye is GOP.

He is against big corporations.   Not a DEM, but not quite GOP either.



Actually he's a card carrying member of the FMP.




popeye1250 -> RE: ANOTHER College Denies Christine O'Donnell Attended Despite Her Claim (10/1/2010 10:09:08 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

I find it ironic that someone who claims to be an independent leans so far to the right that he seems to be in the prone position.

The "Bearded Marxist" article has been addressed by many media outlets as being almost satirical in its content. Too bad the ones still using it as an insult have not grasped that reality.


However, these individuals can ignore the fact that Christine O'Donnell has lied about her education, used campaign funds for personal items such as groceries, gas, personal bills (by the way that is illegal.)

If these are the types of people right leaning independents are supporting, I guess they also support corruption in politics.



Jlf, and I think it's "ironic" that the lefties in here don't seem to want to talk about O'Donnell's opponent, .....what's his name.
You can't get a peep out of them about him!
Could it be the "beareded marxist thang? Or him being a scion of the very wealthy? I wonder if his parents hung out with the DuPonts?
I mean you'd just figure they'd be shouting from the rooftops extolling his virtues right?
If he's "their guy" why aren't they talking about him? Instead, .....silence.




jlf1961 -> RE: ANOTHER College Denies Christine O'Donnell Attended Despite Her Claim (10/1/2010 11:45:47 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

Jlf, and I think it's "ironic" that the lefties in here don't seem to want to talk about O'Donnell's opponent, .....what's his name.


Christopher Andrew "Chris" Coons (born September 9, 1963) is an American lawyer and politician from Wilmington, Delaware, and is the County Executive of New Castle County. On February 3, 2010, he announced his candidacy for the Senate seat vacated by then Vice President-elect Joe Biden, himself a former member of the New Castle County council.


quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250
You can't get a peep out of them about him!
Could it be the "beareded marxist thang? Or him being a scion of the very wealthy? I wonder if his parents hung out with the DuPonts?


During the campaign, a controversy arose surrounding an article Coons wrote in 1985 for his college newspaper, entitled "Chris Coons: The Making of a Bearded Marxist". In it, he describes his transformation from a Republican to a DEMOCRAT.

the title of the article was designed as a humorous take-off on a joke Coons's college friends had made about how his time outside the country had affected his outlook. "After witnessing crushing poverty and the consequences of the Reagan Administration's 'constructive engagement' with the South African apartheid regime, he rethought his political views, returned to the America he loved and proudly registered as a Democrat," Hoffman said in a statement to POLITICO.

He never claimed in the article to be a Marxist, evidently you have some problem grasping what the word SARCASM means.

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250
I mean you'd just figure they'd be shouting from the rooftops extolling his virtues right?
If he's "their guy" why aren't they talking about him? Instead, .....silence.


Actually, the DNC has promoted his campaign quite effectively.

The reason that you dont hear much about him is that he has not made the false claims that his opponent has made, is pretty much well liked by the people in the state of Delaware, and most of all, he is not a wackjob (Karl Rove's description of Christine O'Donnell.)

All Coons has to do is run on the issues and point out that O'Donnell has misused campaign funds and lied about her education.







subrob1967 -> RE: ANOTHER College Denies Christine O'Donnell Attended Despite Her Claim (10/1/2010 3:51:21 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59


quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967

I bet she used her campaign funds to bury her past like our President[;)]


Bury?


What do you mean bury?


What is that the lunitic fringe didn`t bring up and beat to death?

You`re just pissed cuz your pee blew back in your faces.

This is way the fringies had to make shit up and that shit still didn`t work.

Poor poor lunitic fringe.No one`s paying attention.[:D]



You really are a moron.

He paid to have his past sealed, therefore he buried it.




Owner59 -> RE: ANOTHER College Denies Christine O'Donnell Attended Despite Her Claim (10/1/2010 6:43:29 PM)

Who sealed what and for how much?

And some proof.......moron?




subrob1967 -> RE: ANOTHER College Denies Christine O'Donnell Attended Despite Her Claim (10/1/2010 9:11:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Who sealed what and for how much?

And some proof.......moron?


Which of the 219,000 Google links do you want?
http://pumasunleashed.wordpress.com/2009/04/28/fec-shows-more-than-1-million-paid-by-obama-to-top-law-firm-since-election/
http://www.theobamafile.com/_associates/RobertBauer.htm

There's 2 that used actual Federal Election Commission records to show the payoffs.

So, are you outraged at Obama yet?




thornhappy -> RE: ANOTHER College Denies Christine O'Donnell Attended Despite Her Claim (10/1/2010 9:33:06 PM)

Jesus, that stuff's completely bogus.  It's a freakin' birther site!




jlf1961 -> RE: ANOTHER College Denies Christine O'Donnell Attended Despite Her Claim (10/1/2010 10:08:07 PM)

If you run the question of Obama having records sealed on fact check.org all you get is stuff concerning the state of Hawaii and his birth certificate.

All other sites, including the ones that have been posted are all birther sites. There are no serious news media outlets even if you do a search under google news, and that includes Fox saying absolutely nothing.

Its another falsified created fact made up by the extreme right wing lunatics trying to make something out of nothing.

The problem is that there are some who represent the extreme right wing on this site that believe the garbage they make up. I think there is a word for it, I believe it is DELUSIONAL.




tazzygirl -> RE: ANOTHER College Denies Christine O'Donnell Attended Despite Her Claim (10/1/2010 11:06:32 PM)

Odd how Obama wanted to keep his records sealed, according to the birthers and conspiracy nuts, yet overturned the EO 13233 by Bush....


Executive Order 13233[1] limited access to the records of former United States Presidents. It was drafted by then White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales and issued by George W. Bush on November 1, 2001. Section 13 of Order 13233 revoked Executive Order 12667 which was issued by Ronald Reagan on January 18, 1989.

The Order was partially struck down in October 2007, and Barack Obama completely revoked it, by Executive Order 13489[2] on January 21, 2009, his first full day in office. However, as long as no bill is passed by Congress with regard to this issue, any future president is free to issue yet another order to take the place of the revoked order 13233, just as Order 13233 revoked Order 12667.

.........

Thus, the presidential papers of Ronald Reagan were due to be made public when George W. Bush took office in January 2001. However, in a White House memo[5] dated March 23, 2001, the Counsel to the President conveyed the following to U.S Archivist John W. Carlin:

Section 2(b) of Executive Order 12667, issued by former President Ronald Reagan on January 16, 1989, requires the Archivist of the United States to delay release of Presidential records at the instruction of the current President. On behalf of the President, I instruct you to extend for 90 days (until June 21, 2001) the time in which President Bush may claim a constitutionally based privilege over the Presidential records that former President Reagan, acting under Section 2204(a) of Title 4, has protected from disclosure for the 12 years since the end of his Presidency. This directive applies as well to the Vice Presidential records of former Vice President George H.W. Bush.

This instruction was repeated on June 6, 2001,[5] before the 90 days had elapsed, giving a new deadline of August 31, 2001. On the day of this deadline, Alberto Gonzales instructed the Archivist to wait a few additional weeks.[5] On November 1, 2001, Bush issued Executive Order 13233, limiting the access to the records of former U.S. Presidents:

...reflecting military, diplomatic, or national security secrets, Presidential communications, legal advice, legal work, or the deliberative processes of the President and the President's advisers, and to do so in a manner consistent with the Supreme Court's decisions in Nixon v. Administrator of General Services, 433 U.S. 425 (1977), and other cases...

.............

There have been three separate attempts to repeal Order 13233, the latest of which, while still ongoing, is now moot. In 2002, shortly after Order 13233 went into effect, a bipartisan group of U.S. House of Representatives members, led by Stephen Horn (R-CA), Dan Burton (R-IN), Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), and Henry Waxman (D-CA) wrote and debated a bill aimed at repealing Order 13233, thereby restoring Order 12667 to full force and effect. The bill passed the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, which was chaired by Burton at the time, but never saw floor action.

On March 1, 2007, a subcommittee of the Committee on Government Reform held a hearing on bill H.R. 1255, the Presidential Records Act Amendments of 2007. This bill was also introduced by Waxman, and its goal was again to void Order 13233.[9] At the hearing, several historians argued that Order 13233 has severely curtailed public access to presidential records and added to delays in obtaining materials from presidential libraries. The bill was reported favorably by the full committee, and on March 14, 2007, the House passed the bill in an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote of 333-93.[10] The bill also passed on June 13, 2007 in a Senate committee, but was never brought to the floor for a vote,[11] reportedly due to a hold placed on the measure by Senator Jim Bunning (R-KY).[12] As a result, the bill died when the 110th Congress ended.

On January 7, 2009, the House of the 111th Congress passed H.R. 35, introduced by Edolphus Towns (D-NY),[13] section 3 of which would, if enacted, negate Order 13233.[14]. The bill was co-sponsored by Dan Burton (R-IN), Darrell Issa (R-CA), Henry Waxman (D-CA), William Clay (D-MO]], and Brad Sherman (D-CA). The bill is currently under consideration by the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.[15] It remains to be seen whether Bunning will place another hold on the bill, and whether the bill will even reach the floor now that Order 13233 has been revoked. If this bill does not pass, Order 13233 could be reinstated by a future president.


.........

On January 21, 2009, Executive Order 13233 was revoked by executive order of President Barack Obama.[17] Obama essentially restored the wording of Executive Order 12667, by repeating most of the text of that order with minor changes. One notable change is that vice presidential records are explicitly covered by his new order.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_13233




jlf1961 -> RE: ANOTHER College Denies Christine O'Donnell Attended Despite Her Claim (10/1/2010 11:36:57 PM)

quote:

Federal Election Commission records to show the payoffs


Run a search using the quoted term and you come up with birther nonsense. Run the term through factcheck.org and you get nothing, run the term through google news and you get an article about the Koch brothers.




Hippiekinkster -> RE: ANOTHER College Denies Christine O'Donnell Attended Despite Her Claim (10/2/2010 1:31:19 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thornhappy

Jesus, that stuff's completely bogus.  It's a freakin' birther site!
I always like to read the comments from the headcases on links like what ol' Robbie provided us.
"[...]Well, it shocking and considered necessary and immediate attention to short out at the earlier. The number of unemployed people worldwide could increase by more than 50 million in 2009 as the universal recession intensifies, the ILO has forecast.[...]"
(it's important to not make any loud noises around people like this, and to pretend that they actually are making sense; otherwise, they might go off like that insane fuck at the Unitarian Church in Knoxville a year or so ago)




rulemylife -> RE: ANOTHER College Denies Christine O'Donnell Attended Despite Her Claim (10/2/2010 4:58:33 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

Jlf, and I think it's "ironic" that the lefties in here don't seem to want to talk about O'Donnell's opponent, .....what's his name.
You can't get a peep out of them about him!



I find it ironic that someone who claims he is socially liberal is fully supporting a woman who is anti-masturbation, anti-abortion, anti-condom use, and believes the solution to teen pregnancy is abstinence.







Owner59 -> RE: ANOTHER College Denies Christine O'Donnell Attended Despite Her Claim (10/2/2010 7:55:56 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

Jlf, and I think it's "ironic" that the lefties in here don't seem to want to talk about O'Donnell's opponent, .....what's his name.
You can't get a peep out of them about him!



I find it ironic that someone who claims he is socially liberal is fully supporting a woman who is anti-masturbation, anti-abortion, anti-condom use, and believes the solution to teen pregnancy is abstinence.







Pops is gonna tell us he never had sex before marriage,while serving and never jerks it......[8|]


I think he likes that the fundies are just smashing up the place.lol Whoopie!!!! lol

Second City TV had a great on-going skit with John Candy as a dumb hick show host who every few minutes....just wanted to see things "get blowed up real gooood"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dfoVqhQVyQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bda_eIX3J2Y&feature=related


That`s what Pop reminds me of w/ some of his posts.lol





Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.1108398