RE: Fakes (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message

hlen5 -> RE: Fakes (10/2/2010 12:11:36 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy


...............A nice church going woman who bakes apple pies is just a click away.....




Ooo that's me!![sm=hyper.gif]



peppermint -> RE: Fakes (10/2/2010 12:47:05 AM)

I'm sorry but I could point out a strange thing or two about your profile which would make me question if you had 40 years of experience in the lifestyle or not.  For example, strange that after 40 years you don't list even one BDSM like or dislike.  All the items you list are vanilla.  One might imagine that it is due to lack of experience or you could even be a fake. 

The routine for reporting a fake profile is this.  Block sender.  Delete any mail that is sent to you from them.  Cry a few tears of sadness for the sexy, nympho, kinky, DD cupped, siren you thought was interested in you.  Take a deep breath.  Suck it up.  Then go to your nearest munch where there are real people who do this stuff for real. 



DesFIP -> RE: Fakes (10/2/2010 6:30:46 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

I know that Des is real.-- and not a fake.  


Thanks PA. And I baked an apple pie this week. But I'm pretty lax about going to synagogue except for High Holy Days. I was thinking about attending the Torah Study group but it's at night and I have trouble driving in the dark.



WinsomeDefiance -> RE: Fakes (10/2/2010 6:39:49 AM)

I question all these women who claim to bake apple pies. I think they should come over and prove their culinary trueness - by baking for me!



mnottertail -> RE: Fakes (10/2/2010 6:43:32 AM)

I have a question, what if I am looking for a fake?  I can't seem to find any, is there anywhere I can report this?  I am thinking of going over to fetlife, the navigation really sucks, and you really can't find ANYBODY over there,  so I was thinking that would be helpful.

Anyone?  Please, please help, this is not a joke.



poise -> RE: Fakes (10/2/2010 7:08:09 AM)

Instead of venting to us authentic people about all the fakes you come across,
perhaps figure what it is about yourself that keeps attracting them?[:-]



Twoshoes -> RE: Fakes (10/2/2010 7:35:05 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: hlen5
Ooo that's me!![sm=hyper.gif]


I'm definately using your line.
That was good. [;)]



Kreevillicious -> RE: Fakes (10/2/2010 7:51:31 AM)

I noticed that you are actively seeking an online romance. Keep in mind that many people set their search specifically to find online romance, only scan the left side of the profile, and/or don't bother to read the narrative portion of profiles. As such, I would think that you are attracting a higher number of people who don't meet your personal criteria. If your primary interest is an online romance, you should be good to go. If not, consider removing the aforementioned.



SL4V3M4YB3 -> RE: Fakes (10/2/2010 8:26:23 AM)

FR

I don't believe in ops like this anymore because they follow the same pattern. Someone 'unheard' of turns up makes one post and then a couple of pages of insults follow, it's almost as if the op knew that would happen. If the op wants to have some more fun they then come back and reply on the thread. In those circumstances the thread can make half a century of pages easily. I should have seen this years ago as it seems so obvious a ploy now. These people they make one or two posts and then they are supposedly gone.



LadyPact -> RE: Fakes (10/2/2010 8:39:22 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kreevillicious

I noticed that you are actively seeking an online romance.

This is rich.

OK, OP.  You specifically want situations where you won't necessarily meet the other person, and then want to complain that they aren't real?  How many people out there do you really think want to settle for less than what they can really have?



kalikshama -> RE: Fakes (10/2/2010 8:50:05 AM)

As a sub female, I find this useful to reinforce my innate fake detection system: http://www.askdollie.com/acid_test.htm

I'm been successful and weeding out the snerts and HNG, but must confess to a weakness for Control Freaks.

I'm now requesting pictures of toy collections. How can you possibly be experienced with [insert toy] if you don't own one? Several conversations have abruptly ended after this request, hahaha.



DesFIP -> RE: Fakes (10/2/2010 12:46:58 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance

I question all these women who claim to bake apple pies. I think they should come over and prove their culinary trueness - by baking for me!


You would need to challenge The Man and the teen for the pie. Forks at the ready - one, two, three, go!



RedMagic1 -> RE: Fakes (10/2/2010 1:02:35 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama
As a sub female, I find this useful to reinforce my innate fake detection system: http://www.askdollie.com/acid_test.htm

I'm been successful and weeding out the snerts and HNG, but must confess to a weakness for Control Freaks.

I'm now requesting pictures of toy collections. How can you possibly be experienced with [insert toy] if you don't own one? Several conversations have abruptly ended after this request, hahaha.

That "acid test" has been on the internet a long time, and is profoundly bogus.  It was written based on AOL chat room culture, not based on who actually dates online today.  For example, the acid test claims no one with a captain-of-industry-type job is online.  Reality: I've dated a (female) millionaire off this site, and a female friend of mine dated a bank vice-president off a similar site.  He was her master for years.

Also, if someone asked me to send a picture of my toy collection, I would probably block that person.  I am interested in women who want to make a mental and emotional connection with me.  I have zero interest in a woman who wants to lie there while I use toys on her in ways she enjoys.  Send me a picture of your own toy collection first, bee-atch.  If you've been a sub for, oh, six months, and you don't own your own insertables, odds are that you're profoundly dopey or carrying some disease.



MercTech -> RE: Fakes (10/2/2010 3:02:48 PM)

Your report fake profiles if they send you CMail. Check your reply options. I think I report at least one Ghana Girl trolling for money a month.

Stefan



kalikshama -> RE: Fakes (10/2/2010 3:57:55 PM)

Let me clarify about the toy collection picture. I only do this when I already have the suspicion that the person is bullshitting. Additionally, I've met several people who claimed to be experienced with floggers and in fact were not. I'm trying to protect myself from getting hurt.

ps - by toys I meant those that need experience, like floggers, not those that don't, like dildos.



Kreevillicious -> RE: Fakes (10/2/2010 4:39:01 PM)

Sorry Kali, but a picture is no guarantee that the person owns the toys or knows how to use them. This picture was quickly obtained from a google search.

[image]local://upfiles/300383/3FDAB336A0B945ABADCAF5FC787B1AD7.jpg[/image]



SL4V3M4YB3 -> RE: Fakes (10/2/2010 5:04:55 PM)

Deary me who still has oak shelves. Most people have adapted to the pine fashion trend.



Malkinius -> RE: Fakes (10/2/2010 5:35:53 PM)

Greetings.....

quote:

ORIGINAL: SL4V3M4YB3

Deary me who still has oak shelves. Most people have adapted to the pine fashion trend.


That looks like someone took the top off of a headboard and mounted it on the wall. Did they break the rest of it?

Be well....

Malkinius



Kreevillicious -> RE: Fakes (10/2/2010 5:41:07 PM)

Oh no... maybe the person that owns the toys isn't "weal & twue"! Proof that you can't trust a picture!!!



soul2share -> RE: Fakes (10/3/2010 3:25:37 AM)

HEY!  I have that leather paddle....4th one in on the right.....that thing is deadly!  1/4 thick leather, open end double slappy thing that will leave one hell of a bruise!

And yep,  it looks like a waterbed headboard...I used to have one similar to it.



Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.09375