Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Annoyed!


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Annoyed! Page: <<   < prev  3 4 5 [6] 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Annoyed! - 10/8/2010 10:22:18 AM   
bellesoumise


Posts: 258
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline 		WAY too many

(in reply to fluffypet61)
Profile   Post #: 101
RE: Annoyed! - 10/8/2010 10:23:40 AM   
NoirUMC


Posts: 132
Joined: 4/17/2007
Status: offline 		One. The second, to a second party, did not go through.

_____________________________

-J

Working around the clock to find new and entertaining misspellings

(in reply to fluffypet61)
Profile   Post #: 102
RE: Annoyed! - 10/8/2010 10:23:41 AM   
WinsomeDefiance


Posts: 6719
Joined: 8/7/2007
Status: offline 		How many 'good morning' messages did you send out to different people? The Spam filter doen't intuitively know you are corresponding with people you alreadyknow.

Again, if what you are doing is triggering the spam filter - modify your behavior to avoid causing yourself unnecessary nuisance.


(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 103
RE: Annoyed! - 10/8/2010 10:24:04 AM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: NoirUMC

Ok, LP, tell me something: if the idea is to give me a timeout so I learn my lesson, why have I then been blocked a second time (I was unblocked yesterday afternoon) when I havensent ZERO unsolicited messages in that time?

Blocked as in not having the ability to send mail?  Usually the term "blocked" is between user to user.

If your email was reinstated, and then taken away again, it could be a delayed response (still based on spam you sent previously) and the block was put back on your account.  As I've said before, I'm not a moderator, so I don't know what happens once an account is flagged or how it is handled.  Mod One has put a response on this thread that, to date, none of the complaints that they have received from folks about being flagged by the spam filter have been without reason.  If your mail was allowed again during a review, and then closed again because it was confirmed that you were sending spam, it's still because you were sending spam in the first place.

Also, I'll confirm what Lockit has said.  I've been in rapid, short content exchanges with another user that have never had a problem.  If Win is correct from your journal entry, you are sending mail that creates the response you get.  The women you are contacting do not want the messages that they are receiving from you.  Pretty simple in My view.


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to NoirUMC)
Profile   Post #: 104
RE: Annoyed! - 10/8/2010 10:26:56 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline 		The women you are contacting do not want the messages that they are receiving from you./       snip

That is not what he wants to hear.

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 105
RE: Annoyed! - 10/8/2010 10:31:10 AM   
NoirUMC


Posts: 132
Joined: 4/17/2007
Status: offline 		Why should the spam filter not instead be modified not to trigger based on innocuous behavior?

Obviously simple rapid-fire chat is not enough in itself to triggerthe filter. But if non-actionable rapid-fire chat, which is innocent and blameless, is enough--in concert with any other action or combination of actions--to trigger the sanction, then the filter is just dumb.

Again, I don't think my innocuous messages had anything to do with this.



_____________________________

-J

Working around the clock to find new and entertaining misspellings

(in reply to WinsomeDefiance)
Profile   Post #: 106
RE: Annoyed! - 10/8/2010 10:33:34 AM   
NoirUMC


Posts: 132
Joined: 4/17/2007
Status: offline 		If a person has a lolcat-esque "NOT WANT" response to a message, then, as LP pointed out, there is a separate button for that. "NOT WANT!" is nowhere in any of the rules I've read. And, yeah, I have. -.-

_____________________________

-J

Working around the clock to find new and entertaining misspellings

(in reply to NoirUMC)
Profile   Post #: 107
RE: Annoyed! - 10/8/2010 10:33:53 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		write that filter for me, I want to see what it looks like  (please use java, or c/c++)

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to NoirUMC)
Profile   Post #: 108
RE: Annoyed! - 10/8/2010 10:35:28 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline 		I would LOVE to see ALL of the incoming and outgoing emails UNEDITED.

Could you post them (not here tho)  and show a link?

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 109
RE: Annoyed! - 10/8/2010 10:36:39 AM   
NoirUMC


Posts: 132
Joined: 4/17/2007
Status: offline 		Neither Java nor C++ will work on a website, silly.

_____________________________

-J

Working around the clock to find new and entertaining misspellings

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 110
RE: Annoyed! - 10/8/2010 10:37:42 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		how is that possibly true?  what is the filter filter language?  

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to NoirUMC)
Profile   Post #: 111
RE: Annoyed! - 10/8/2010 10:39:46 AM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline 		The form letter that the OP refers to in his journal is spam.  There are no two ways about that.  I'm curious to know how many of those were sent out.  The content really doesn't matter.

_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to NoirUMC)
Profile   Post #: 112
RE: Annoyed! - 10/8/2010 10:40:15 AM   
NoirUMC


Posts: 132
Joined: 4/17/2007
Status: offline 		Java requires a VM to run and c++ has to be compiled. Neither is used to serve webpages, and neither ever has been. I expect the filter is a JavaScript, which, despite the name, is unrelated to java.

< Message edited by NoirUMC -- 10/8/2010 10:41:11 AM >

_____________________________

-J

Working around the clock to find new and entertaining misspellings

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 113
RE: Annoyed! - 10/8/2010 10:41:17 AM   
WinsomeDefiance


Posts: 6719
Joined: 8/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: NoirUMC

Why should the spam filter not instead be modified not to trigger based on innocuous behavior?



As numero uno (Mod1) already stated, the site adminstrators ARE in the process of tweaking the new spam program. It takes a while to work out bugs from a new program, mod or upgrade.

Mod1 also stated that so far, none of the people who have contacted support and were individually evaluated - were innocent of spamming. I'm assuming this means you as well, since you did state you contacted support. Again, assuming that your support ticket has been read and processed already, something you are doing is considered spam by those monitoring outgoing mail. If you happen to be the one person who has thus far had an issue with the spam filter that IS innocent of spamming, then I'm sure your concerns will be addressed and you will have helped the site administrators know where to focus some of that tweaking they are performing.

Tweaks, debugging and modifications are long-term fixes. What you need is a short-term fix and that falls squarely in YOUR lap. Again, modify your behavior if you want to modify your results.

Good luck with things,

WinD

(in reply to NoirUMC)
Profile   Post #: 114
RE: Annoyed! - 10/8/2010 10:42:27 AM   
NoirUMC


Posts: 132
Joined: 4/17/2007
Status: offline 		Told you already, LP: none.

_____________________________

-J

Working around the clock to find new and entertaining misspellings

(in reply to NoirUMC)
Profile   Post #: 115
RE: Annoyed! - 10/8/2010 10:44:19 AM   
NoirUMC


Posts: 132
Joined: 4/17/2007
Status: offline 		If the filter is admittedly being tweaked, why is the immediate response of the community to smear and malign anyone caught in it?

_____________________________

-J

Working around the clock to find new and entertaining misspellings

(in reply to NoirUMC)
Profile   Post #: 116
RE: Annoyed! - 10/8/2010 10:45:00 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance


quote:

ORIGINAL: NoirUMC

Why should the spam filter not instead be modified not to trigger based on innocuous behavior?



As numero uno (Mod1) already stated, the site adminstrators ARE in the process of tweaking the new spam program. It takes a while to work out bugs from a new program, mod or upgrade.

Mod1 also stated that so far, none of the people who have contacted support and were individually evaluated - were innocent of spamming. I'm assuming this means you as well, since you did state you contacted support. Again, assuming that your support ticket has been read and processed already, something you are doing is considered spam by those monitoring outgoing mail. If you happen to be the one person who has thus far had an issue with the spam filter that IS innocent of spamming, then I'm sure your concerns will be addressed and you will have helped the site administrators know where to focus some of that tweaking they are performing.

Tweaks, debugging and modifications are long-term fixes. What you need is a short-term fix and that falls squarely in YOUR lap. Again, modify your behavior if you want to modify your results.

Good luck with things,

WinD



If it were me- I would set up a 2nd account- until this is resolved.   And I would be careful not to trigger it again.

(in reply to WinsomeDefiance)
Profile   Post #: 117
RE: Annoyed! - 10/8/2010 10:47:21 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: NoirUMC

Java requires a VM to run and c++ has to be compiled. Neither is used to serve webpages, and neither ever has been. I expect the filter is a JavaScript, which, despite the name, is unrelated to java.


I agree that the wrapper is JS, but you think the filter functions are not lex java or c? 

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to NoirUMC)
Profile   Post #: 118
RE: Annoyed! - 10/8/2010 10:50:19 AM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline 		It's very rare for Me to take a look at a person's journal to get background info for a thread.  However, the last two entries are very telling.

1.  You weren't happy with women simply deleting your messages or telling you that they were not interested.

2.  Recently, you increased the age limit on your search.  It wouldn't surprise Me at all if you were contacting more people after you saw that "women old enough to be your mother" were also attractive.  (If you contacted Me, and I saw that journal entry, I don't think you would have liked how the exchange went, either.)

3.  You openly tell people to expect form letters.


If your actual communications with others went anything like the above suggests, I'd say the spam filter is working very well.


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to NoirUMC)
Profile   Post #: 119
RE: Annoyed! - 10/8/2010 10:51:14 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: NoirUMC

If the filter is admittedly being tweaked, why is the immediate response of the community to smear and malign anyone caught in it?


The banter here has not been smear and maligned.  It has been fairly  tit for tat- - with ample patience early in the thread.

Do you want a pity party?      Is that it?   Are you ok?  I mean- is there a new medication you are on?

Nobody smeared/maligned you.   This is typical banter.

(in reply to NoirUMC)
Profile   Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 5 [6] 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Annoyed! Page: <<   < prev  3 4 5 [6] 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.110