TheHeretic
Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007 From: California, USA Status: offline
|
I was thinking about this subject a fair bit as I went about my day, yesterday. I was thousands of miles away, and 3 years old when this happened, but I have my own history with the sorts of things the FBI was up to in that era. I sometimes forget that what I just casually know to be true about the period, is still a shocking revelation for some, and something to be reflexively denied by more. The story of shots in the crowd isn't new. Neither is the version where those shots were fired when a spy for the FBI panicked. Is this enough to take the lid off how and why those reports didn't make the final cut? By itself, I don't think it is. That makes my first impression of this story, both when I saw it in one of my news feeds and again here, the one I'm sticking with. It just doesn't matter. Now if the people who know for sure, especially the photographer, decide it is time to let go of the burden they have been carrying for 40 years, then we will have something for the talk shows and the book stores. In the grand picture, the elements for a tragedy like this existed in many places. The protesters thought the guns were loaded with blanks, and the guys who sent the soldiers out thought the hippies were a genuine threat. It was a misunderstanding, fated to get people killed.
_____________________________
If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced. That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.
|