|
SpiritedRadiance -> RE: Female Circumcision (10/12/2010 10:29:25 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DarkKnightseeks
First, let me say that I'm not in favor of forced mutilation of anyone's genitalia. Consenting to it, on the other hand, well, I've seen stranger. What I would be interested to know, is if the OP or any of the other males on here are circumcised themselves? Also curious how many of the women who are up in arms about this topic favor uncircumcised men to circumcised? It seems a double standard that we are so bothered by one side, when here in the U.S. we circumcise millions of boys without their consent. I'm speaking as both and American and an uncircumcised male. I'm glad to see that recent numbers are showing a decline in circumcisions, but am curious to see what a forum dedicated to this topic has to say.
because theirs a difference, the forskin of a mans penis has very little nerve endings in it, where clit removal is removing the ENTIRE nerve bundle.
Male circumcision does not leave the male unable to cum ever again,
Female circumcision, is aimed at removing all parts of the females genitalia that can lead to her enjoying or having pleasure from sexual intercourse, as well as seriously hindering her ability to become sexually aroused.
Male circumcision, has a .03% risk of infection
Female circumcision has a 17% risk of infection. Higher in places where its done illegally.
Male circumcision isn't by drs considered mutilation regardless of your opinions on it, because its doing nothing but removing excess skin.
Female circumcision is considered mutilation because its removing entire PARTS of the females genitalia.
IF male circumcision involved cutting off the head of the penis, it might be comparable, but seeing as its just a bit of foreskin its not really all that comparable.
- from a woman who loves uncut penis just as much as cut penis.
|
|
|
|
