Whorehouse Harry Reid in big trouble! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


popeye1250 -> Whorehouse Harry Reid in big trouble! (10/13/2010 10:09:44 PM)

On the news tonight they showed Joe Isuzu (Bill Clinton) out in Nevada stumping for whorehouse Harry.
He said, "Reid delivers time and time again."
Ok, Las Vegas is the foreclosure capital of the country, Nevada is number one in bank failures, in the top three I think for bankruptcies, and number one in unemployment.
Now they said that Sharon Angle is steadily pulling away from him in all polls and,....she collected *$14 Million in donations in the last quarter!*
That's HUGE!
And whorehouse Harry says he didn't have anything to do with any of this financial malaise that we're in!
Boy! When they have to dust off Bill Clinton to talk (for) you you *know* you're in big trouble!




pahunkboy -> RE: Whorehouse Harry Reid in big trouble! (10/13/2010 10:40:58 PM)

LOL-   some survey place phoned me to ask my opinions.   It was quite a call.




joether -> RE: Whorehouse Harry Reid in big trouble! (10/13/2010 10:46:09 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250
On the news tonight they showed Joe Isuzu (Bill Clinton) out in Nevada stumping for whorehouse Harry.
He said, "Reid delivers time and time again."
Ok, Las Vegas is the foreclosure capital of the country, Nevada is number one in bank failures, in the top three I think for bankruptcies, and number one in unemployment.
Now they said that Sharon Angle is steadily pulling away from him in all polls and,....she collected *$14 Million in donations in the last quarter!*
That's HUGE!
And whorehouse Harry says he didn't have anything to do with any of this financial malaise that we're in!
Boy! When they have to dust off Bill Clinton to talk (for) you you *know* you're in big trouble!


You should get your head look at. Either that, or crack open a history book...

Yes, Sharron Angle did indeed get $14 million in donations. She is suspected, to be highly in debt. But, she doesn't want to release the books. Why should goverment officals be accountible for how they spend money? That is, a Tea Party concept, is it not? That officals be responsibile with the spending of 'other people's money'. Last I checked, a 'donation' is 'another person's money', given in good faith to another person or organization. So yes, it is a curious set of questions, I will not be surprised, if they are not answered. Because, as we all know, Republican/Tea Party members, hate accountibility. But they are more then happy (estastic even), to point fingers at Democrats on accountibility.







popeye1250 -> RE: Whorehouse Harry Reid in big trouble! (10/13/2010 10:59:52 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250
On the news tonight they showed Joe Isuzu (Bill Clinton) out in Nevada stumping for whorehouse Harry.
He said, "Reid delivers time and time again."
Ok, Las Vegas is the foreclosure capital of the country, Nevada is number one in bank failures, in the top three I think for bankruptcies, and number one in unemployment.
Now they said that Sharon Angle is steadily pulling away from him in all polls and,....she collected *$14 Million in donations in the last quarter!*
That's HUGE!
And whorehouse Harry says he didn't have anything to do with any of this financial malaise that we're in!
Boy! When they have to dust off Bill Clinton to talk (for) you you *know* you're in big trouble!


You should get your head look at. Either that, or crack open a history book...

Yes, Sharron Angle did indeed get $14 million in donations. She is suspected, to be highly in debt. But, she doesn't want to release the books. Why should goverment officals be accountible for how they spend money? That is, a Tea Party concept, is it not? That officals be responsibile with the spending of 'other people's money'. Last I checked, a 'donation' is 'another person's money', given in good faith to another person or organization. So yes, it is a curious set of questions, I will not be surprised, if they are not answered. Because, as we all know, Republican/Tea Party members, hate accountibility. But they are more then happy (estastic even), to point fingers at Democrats on accountibility.







Well, noone is "suspecting" that whorehouse Harry has put us all in debt.




Owner59 -> RE: Whorehouse Harry Reid in big trouble! (10/13/2010 11:42:10 PM)

What an angry title!

And ironic........right sailor?[:D]




popeye1250 -> RE: Whorehouse Harry Reid in big trouble! (10/14/2010 12:00:56 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

What an angry title!

And ironic........right sailor?[:D]



Owner, no worse than "COCKSUCKER!"
Hey, maybe whorehouse Harry should have "Client number nine" Eliot Spitzer out to Nevada to speak for him eh?
"Where the hell is he!" "He's supposed to go on in ten minutes!!!"
"Noone's seen him for hours!"
"Send someone out to check the Bunny Ranch!"

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_campaign_money
See, they know he's in big trouble!




tazzygirl -> RE: Whorehouse Harry Reid in big trouble! (10/14/2010 2:01:18 AM)

In all polls?

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2010/10/13/5286201-poll-reid-leads-angle-by-3-

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/10/ppp-poll-reid-leads-angle-by-one-point.php

never say always, all, none or never... especially when speaking about politics.




rulemylife -> RE: Whorehouse Harry Reid in big trouble! (10/14/2010 5:04:23 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

Now they said that Sharon Angle is steadily pulling away from him in all polls and,...


Steadily pulling away from him?

Right on top of things as always Popeye.


Election 2010: Nevada Senate - Rasmussen Reports™
Oct 13, 2010 ... Nevada Senate: Reid (D), Angle (R) Tied Again ...


The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of Likely Voters in Nevada finds Angle with 49% support and Reid at 48%. One percent (1%) like another candidate in the race, and another one percent (1%) are still undecided. (To see question wording, click here.)

In seven consecutive surveys, both candidates have seen their level of support generally in the upper forty’s and both have touched the 50% mark but never topped it.  In those seven surveys, Reid has held the edge three times, Angle three times and they were tied at 48% in one. Neither candidate has held a lead outside the margin of sampling error.




EternalHoH -> RE: Whorehouse Harry Reid in big trouble! (10/14/2010 7:14:07 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250
Ok, Las Vegas is the foreclosure capital of the country, Nevada is number one in bank failures, in the top three I think for bankruptcies, and number one in unemployment.



Harry Reid is responsible for Nevadans buying "too much house" in a desert oasis? 

I did not know that.





mnottertail -> RE: Whorehouse Harry Reid in big trouble! (10/14/2010 7:53:14 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

On the news tonight they showed Joe Isuzu (Bill Clinton) out in Nevada stumping for whorehouse Harry.
He said, "Reid delivers time and time again."
Ok, Las Vegas is the foreclosure capital of the country, Nevada is number one in bank failures, in the top three I think for bankruptcies, and number one in unemployment.
Now they said that Sharon Angle is steadily pulling away from him in all polls and,....she collected *$14 Million in donations in the last quarter!*
That's HUGE!
And whorehouse Harry says he didn't have anything to do with any of this financial malaise that we're in!
Boy! When they have to dust off Bill Clinton to talk (for) you you *know* you're in big trouble!


Wouldn't you say that BillyBobJimmieBoy is a fairly well known democrat?  Weren't you saying that (as a matter of personal knowledge) these folks were not identifying themselves as democrat?

Exactly how many sides of your mouth are there? How many confilicting ideas (I shudder to give them that stature) can you assimilate and find connections to? 




EternalHoH -> RE: Whorehouse Harry Reid in big trouble! (10/14/2010 8:14:51 AM)

The fact that Nevada is number 1 in foreclosures speaks volumes about cause of all the trouble.  It was really caused by fraud initiated by private sector lenders.  I don't think Nevada is prime territory for Fanne & Freddie putting poor people into housing.

Out of all the people who should never have been given mortgages, 20% of the problem was Fannie and Freddie. 80% of the problem is on the private sector bankers who handed out excessive mortages FOR PROFIT. Initiate the loan, sell it to Wall St for bundling into securities, and wipe you own hands of any risk.

Vegas is ground zero because of the nature of its clientele and the predatory private sector lenders who 'worked over' that clientele.





servantforuse -> RE: Whorehouse Harry Reid in big trouble! (10/14/2010 9:04:57 AM)

And those people who bought houses they knew they cound never pay for had nothing to do with the problem.




Lucylastic -> RE: Whorehouse Harry Reid in big trouble! (10/14/2010 9:20:39 AM)

Thats why all 50 states have stopped foreclosures. All those bad bad fraudulent people who are  looking for part of the dream.. cos yanno, housing is only for those who can afford to pay inflated prices. working joes can rent...






popeye1250 -> RE: Whorehouse Harry Reid in big trouble! (10/14/2010 9:48:34 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

On the news tonight they showed Joe Isuzu (Bill Clinton) out in Nevada stumping for whorehouse Harry.
He said, "Reid delivers time and time again."
Ok, Las Vegas is the foreclosure capital of the country, Nevada is number one in bank failures, in the top three I think for bankruptcies, and number one in unemployment.
Now they said that Sharon Angle is steadily pulling away from him in all polls and,....she collected *$14 Million in donations in the last quarter!*
That's HUGE!
And whorehouse Harry says he didn't have anything to do with any of this financial malaise that we're in!
Boy! When they have to dust off Bill Clinton to talk (for) you you *know* you're in big trouble!


Wouldn't you say that BillyBobJimmieBoy is a fairly well known democrat?  Weren't you saying that (as a matter of personal knowledge) these folks were not identifying themselves as democrat?

Exactly how many sides of your mouth are there? How many confilicting ideas (I shudder to give them that stature) can you assimilate and find connections to? 



Oh,.....sorry Ron,....my mistake, whorehouse Harry's not in big trouble!




EternalHoH -> RE: Whorehouse Harry Reid in big trouble! (10/14/2010 10:28:38 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

And those people who bought houses they knew they cound never pay for had nothing to do with the problem.


Sure, the unqualified borrower has something to do with the problem. But they weren't THE problem. That's a big difference. Painting them and their government enablers (Barney the purple congressman) as THE problem is always first step of many on the right. And its wrong.

The banks would not have been doing this if Greenspan had not been running the printing presses on overtime. The people who were handed free money by the bankers, the people who were given cash at the close of escrow (essentially getting PAID by the bank to buy a house), would not have been able to do so if Greenspan had not been so busy dropping free money down upon the nation from his helicopter.

In his book, Greenspan cites Ayn Rand as the biggest influence in his life. Greenspan's tenure was the closest that this nation came to having a Randite running the country. Greenspan was the most prominent deregulator in the most critical regulatory job in the country; the job of regulating the money supply. Its no wonder our economy blew bubble after bubble from an oversupply of cash. Starting with Reagan and the defense bubble, then the tech bubble, then the stock bubble, then the housing bubble, now the China bubble.... Do you think China's economy would be the bubble it is today without the Fed's printing presses running overtime and supplying us with the cash to buy their cheap junk at Walmart?

So much for Ayn Rand running the country. Now we know how well that goes.

After this clusterfuck of a housing situation was built, we can thank former congressman Phil Gramm of Texas for the casino legislation that magnified its negative impact 50 to 60 times. Not only did the buyers of these bundled mortgage securities want 'insurance' protection on their purchase, but people who had no involvement in these mortgage securities were gambling on the prospect of their default, and expecting to get paid when the mortgages did default. When the banks imploded and AIG went on life support, it was over the gambling liabilities. When your tax money pays for a TARP bailout, its bailing out the gambling part, not the irresponsible housing loan part.

BTW, the Madoff scandal has similarities to Greenspan.  Madoff happened because you had deregulators working in regulatory jobs at the SEC. Rather than enforce regulations, those deregulators looked the other way.  A major difference here is that damage from Madoff was confined to a handful of rich jewish estates. It wasn't as widespread as the fallout from the dynamic duo of Greenspan and Gramm.






popeye1250 -> RE: Whorehouse Harry Reid in big trouble! (10/14/2010 10:32:32 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

Now they said that Sharon Angle is steadily pulling away from him in all polls and,...


Steadily pulling away from him?

Right on top of things as always Popeye.


Election 2010: Nevada Senate - Rasmussen Reports™
Oct 13, 2010 ... Nevada Senate: Reid (D), Angle (R) Tied Again ...


The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of Likely Voters in Nevada finds Angle with 49% support and Reid at 48%. One percent (1%) like another candidate in the race, and another one percent (1%) are still undecided. (To see question wording, click here.)

In seven consecutive surveys, both candidates have seen their level of support generally in the upper forty’s and both have touched the 50% mark but never topped it.  In those seven surveys, Reid has held the edge three times, Angle three times and they were tied at 48% in one. Neither candidate has held a lead outside the margin of sampling error.




Rule, didn't Angle start out at 38% or so 6-8 months ago? Now she's at 49% and gaining. I'd call that pretty "steady!" Wouldn't you?
Ten points or so in 6 months, I'd call that "steadily gaining" dont'cha think?
Ten $bucks says that Whorehouse Harry will cry in public before the election!




Lucylastic -> RE: Whorehouse Harry Reid in big trouble! (10/14/2010 11:12:50 AM)

Pops....you are bloody hysterical ..not ONE week ago, you were saying she is three points ahead, now shes ahead again??
http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3429460

at one point she was 47 points to 40.1 against  Reid, so how is she surging ahead???
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2010/senate/nv/nevada_senate_angle_vs_reid-1517.html
You really shouldnt believe everything you think,  cos others see it as lying or bullshitting.
Someone else might wanna point out his wishful thinking  as I think he is ignoring me(woe woe is me)





mnottertail -> RE: Whorehouse Harry Reid in big trouble! (10/14/2010 11:19:03 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Pops....you are bloody hysterical ..not ONE week ago, you were saying she is three points ahead, now shes ahead again??
http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3429460

at one point she was 47 points to 40.1 against  Reid, so how is she surging ahead???
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2010/senate/nv/nevada_senate_angle_vs_reid-1517.html
You really shouldnt believe everything you think,  cos others see it as lying or bullshitting.
Someone else might wanna point out his wishful thinking  as I think he is ignoring me(woe woe is me)




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EegRh8Z4H-o




popeye1250 -> RE: Whorehouse Harry Reid in big trouble! (10/14/2010 11:29:48 AM)

Funny, all that "Change" Obama was talking about in 2008. Maybe he meant that it was comming, " two years from now."




mnottertail -> RE: Whorehouse Harry Reid in big trouble! (10/14/2010 11:37:02 AM)

no, it is as it has always been since time immemorial............many many people fight change.  so, change is hard to accomplish, but does this mean we should not keep fighting for our ideals?




Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875