Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

The folly of Rand Paul


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> The folly of Rand Paul Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
The folly of Rand Paul - 10/16/2010 7:50:12 AM   
DomYngBlk


Posts: 3316
Joined: 3/27/2006
Status: offline 		In another incredible move Mr. Paul seems to want to do away with the income tax and replace it with a 23% National Sales tax. Or does he? Flip flopping like a catfish just yanked out of the river Mr. Paul is showing why he and is tea party brethern are not prepared to try and govern this land. This race was once a run away for Mr. Paul but now has tightened considerably. Can only hope the people of Kentucky do the right thing.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/14/rand-paul-refuses-to-addr_n_762361.html
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: The folly of Rand Paul - 10/16/2010 8:10:57 AM   
EternalHoH


Posts: 791
Joined: 5/30/2010
Status: offline 		The problem with Rand Paul is he failed to follow in the footsteps of his dad's movement, and instead hooked up with the tea baggers, which adds the negrophobe and other silly elements that his dad's movement did not have. He is tainted like hot water is after its been dipped with a tea bag.

I liked his dad, albeit Ron was a bit scatterbrained, too, but Rand is off the charts scatterbrained.

And how come both Ron and Rand are in medicine?  Out of all the professions to be in when expressing the libertarian view, medicine and its 50% socialist funding is not the place to be drawing a paycheck from when you stump the libertarian viewpoint.

(in reply to DomYngBlk)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: The folly of Rand Paul - 10/16/2010 8:13:01 AM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline 		Nothing new.

He can't seem to take a stand on any issue:

Campaign Watchdog

"It's hard to go around campaigning on that, it's about as unpopular of an issue as there is, but it probably has to happen," Paul said at the time. "We moved it to 67 gradually. Probably that's what you need to do again to 70."

When asked this week on the campaign trail if the AFL-CIO mailer was accurate and if he supports privatizing Social Security and raising the age to receive benefits, Paul responded by saying "there are a lot of solutions out there to try to fix it".

"All I've said is that a lot of these solutions will have to be discussed and difficult decisions will have to be made," he said. "The exact policy decisions are best done through a bipartisan commission."





< Message edited by rulemylife -- 10/16/2010 8:15:56 AM >

(in reply to DomYngBlk)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: The folly of Rand Paul - 10/16/2010 8:51:42 AM   
RacerJim


Posts: 1583
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline 		I'll take Mr. Paul's supposed flip-flopping over Mr. Obama's proven lies any day.

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: The folly of Rand Paul - 10/16/2010 9:04:49 AM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RacerJim

I'll take Mr. Paul's supposed flip-flopping over Mr. Obama's proven lies any day.


I knew it wouldn't take long for someone to go there.

Without even rehashing that debate, the problem is Paul never takes a firm stand.

Isn't that what you guys complained about Kerry?  Yet you are defending Paul.



(in reply to RacerJim)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: The folly of Rand Paul - 10/16/2010 9:04:54 AM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

Nothing new.

He can't seem to take a stand on any issue:

Campaign Watchdog

"It's hard to go around campaigning on that, it's about as unpopular of an issue as there is, but it probably has to happen," Paul said at the time. "We moved it to 67 gradually. Probably that's what you need to do again to 70."

When asked this week on the campaign trail if the AFL-CIO mailer was accurate and if he supports privatizing Social Security and raising the age to receive benefits, Paul responded by saying "there are a lot of solutions out there to try to fix it".

"All I've said is that a lot of these solutions will have to be discussed and difficult decisions will have to be made," he said. "The exact policy decisions are best done through a bipartisan commission."





Well he certainly can't cut social security or medicaid given the amount of lardy white scroungers in the tea party massive. A lot of them are old farts, of course, but most of those have already retired.

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: The folly of Rand Paul - 10/16/2010 9:06:05 AM   
DomYngBlk


Posts: 3316
Joined: 3/27/2006
Status: offline 		No, he has a firm stand on the state he is trying to win election in.....that is....he has no clue of its history.

http://wonkette.com/417123/comedy-legend-rand-paul-doesnt-want-coal-miners-going-soft

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: The folly of Rand Paul - 10/16/2010 9:14:09 AM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RacerJim

I'll take Mr. Paul's supposed flip-flopping over Mr. Obama's proven lies any day.
Well let's stop the presses and order a re-write ,RJ has made a startleing pronouncement.
Here's a question for you ..why is young Mr Paul against all sorts og Gov't entitlements yet has no problem with the specific programs that benifit his chosen profession?

< Message edited by slvemike4u -- 10/16/2010 9:16:24 AM >

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to RacerJim)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: The folly of Rand Paul - 10/16/2010 9:17:37 AM   
DomYngBlk


Posts: 3316
Joined: 3/27/2006
Status: offline 		Or even better. Why is Mr. Paul only liscenced to do Opthamology through his own Opthamology association?

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: The folly of Rand Paul - 10/16/2010 9:21:54 AM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline 		Nor has he ever rejected govt checks ...entitlement programs can be so convenient at times.....So can principles,as long as they are selective and of convenience.

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to DomYngBlk)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: The folly of Rand Paul - 10/16/2010 9:24:29 AM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

Well he certainly can't cut social security or medicaid given the amount of lardy white scroungers in the tea party massive. A lot of them are old farts, of course, but most of those have already retired.


More brain-exploding economic reasoning from the Tea Party



(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: The folly of Rand Paul - 10/16/2010 9:29:02 AM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline 		Oh dear. They haven't thought this through, have they?

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: The folly of Rand Paul - 10/16/2010 10:42:23 AM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline 		What made you think they had?

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: The folly of Rand Paul - 10/16/2010 1:38:56 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife
Nothing new.

He can't seem to take a stand on any issue:

Campaign Watchdog

"It's hard to go around campaigning on that, it's about as unpopular of an issue as there is, but it probably has to happen," Paul said at the time. "We moved it to 67 gradually. Probably that's what you need to do again to 70."

When asked this week on the campaign trail if the AFL-CIO mailer was accurate and if he supports privatizing Social Security and raising the age to receive benefits, Paul responded by saying "there are a lot of solutions out there to try to fix it".

"All I've said is that a lot of these solutions will have to be discussed and difficult decisions will have to be made," he said. "The exact policy decisions are best done through a bipartisan commission."


Well he certainly can't cut social security or medicaid given the amount of lardy white scroungers in the tea party massive. A lot of them are old farts, of course, but most of those have already retired.

You mean those old farts that say no to govt.-run health care but don't dare touch my Medicare ? The ones who cash farm subsidy checks while bitch'n about welfare moms ? They are the TV party (Fox) and nothing much more.

Oh and BTW, Rand is a another radical, right-wing, nut case.


< Message edited by MrRodgers -- 10/16/2010 1:41:01 PM >

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: The folly of Rand Paul - 10/16/2010 1:54:33 PM   
Nnytheangel


Posts: 24
Joined: 10/15/2010
From: Tulsa
Status: offline 		All politicians change their stances for political expediency. The ones who don't stay the same because their current stance keeps them in their position, which is really what any of it is about. The getting and retaining of political office. I have a hard time thinking of any politician who was selfless enough to honestly put their constituents at the forefront of their interests. The only times I see that happening is, as I've said, when it keeps them in the position they've enjoyed.

_____________________________

"If you could be God's worst enemy or nothing, which would you choose?" - Fight Club

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: The folly of Rand Paul - 10/17/2010 8:24:28 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

I have a hard time thinking of any politician who was selfless enough to honestly put their constituents at the forefront of their interests.


That is so not true. I see it happening all the time. The run for office because they truly care about the people and want to make this country a better place for all to live. The spend their whole lives fighting for those who can't fight for themselves and passing law to make this a more just place to live.....Oh wait, your not talking about tv shows are you?

Never mind.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to Nnytheangel)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: The folly of Rand Paul - 10/17/2010 8:31:15 AM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

I have a hard time thinking of any politician who was selfless enough to honestly put their constituents at the forefront of their interests.


That is so not true. I see it happening all the time. The run for office because they truly care about the people and want to make this country a better place for all to live. The spend their whole lives fighting for those who can't fight for themselves and passing law to make this a more just place to live.....Oh wait, your not talking about tv shows are you?

Never mind.
IMO the shame is that many probably enter the politicol arena with such lofty ambitions....but it seems only those that are willing to "play ball" rise to prominence.What really troubles me is that there doesn't seem to be much that can be done to address that sad state of affairs.

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: The folly of Rand Paul - 10/17/2010 10:40:58 AM   
DomYngBlk


Posts: 3316
Joined: 3/27/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnytheangel

All politicians change their stances for political expediency. The ones who don't stay the same because their current stance keeps them in their position, which is really what any of it is about. The getting and retaining of political office. I have a hard time thinking of any politician who was selfless enough to honestly put their constituents at the forefront of their interests. The only times I see that happening is, as I've said, when it keeps them in the position they've enjoyed.


I don't think that is true at all. Politicians do exactly what we tell them to do. They mirror us in every way depending on the party they are from. I actually can't think of one that doesn't.

(in reply to Nnytheangel)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: The folly of Rand Paul - 10/17/2010 4:08:36 PM   
Nnytheangel


Posts: 24
Joined: 10/15/2010
From: Tulsa
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk

I don't think that is true at all. Politicians do exactly what we tell them to do.


I am stopping the quote at that point for a specific reason. It highlights what I was saying to an extent. Politicians, the smart ones, will do what the people want. The issue is less them working against the public good and more a matter of them doing so because it is what is required for them to retain their 'lofty position'.

I have decided that there is most certainly a way for a politician to prove altruism, however. One is elected to office, does what work they can for the people, then steps down and does not run again. And yes, I can hear the question/statement now "What good can they do in such a short time?" Very little, themselves. But the next candidate up can continue forward and so on. That is a way that one can be certain they have the will of their constituents in mind, instead of trying to accomplish things individually for personal glory.

Will this idea ever happen? Quite doubtful. Is it realistic? Of course not. I do not expect any politician to actually cede power on the whim of one person, or even one hundred or one thousand. We are speaking mostly of things abstract and unquantifiable. It is mostly a purely philosophical thought experiment on my part. However, I do still hold fast on my opinion.

_____________________________

"If you could be God's worst enemy or nothing, which would you choose?" - Fight Club

(in reply to DomYngBlk)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: The folly of Rand Paul - 10/17/2010 4:23:58 PM   
brokedickdog


Posts: 114
Joined: 8/13/2010
Status: offline 		Rasmussen poll on 9-30-2010 put Paul at 49% and Conway at 38%.

Don't kill the messenger.

(in reply to Nnytheangel)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> The folly of Rand Paul Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.203