Moonhead
Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009 Status: offline
|
There are plenty of right leaning authors whose work I admire. Does the fact that Yeats was a nazi vitiate his role as the best poet of the twentieth century? Are Tarr or At The Mountains of Madness unreadable because Lewis and Lovecraft were facist sympathisers? A good piece of fiction has enough power to pull you in and hold your attention, regardless of your ideology. Dirty Harry is a perfect example of this. The problem starts when a writer (or director, or whatever) sees ideological arguments as more important than telling a story, a a piece of fiction as nothing more than a framework for philosophical arguments. You might put up with that if you're sympathetic to the philosophy at work, but if you're not, it's very obtrusive and can cause problems. At it's very best this approach tends to produce the dull, argumentative novels of the late Wells, Huxley or Heinlein, and from there it's a short step down to utter drivel, like the shite that the Ayn Rands and Jerry Pournelles of this world squeeze, and even that isn't as bad as this approach can get: have a look online for a pdf of The Turner Diaries, if you can avoid paying for it. Even a lot of white supremacists find that one unreadable...
_____________________________
I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted... (Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)
|