DomKen
Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004 From: Chicago, IL Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: TheHeretic LOL, Ken. I'm a bit of a nut when it comes to the First, but restrictions on activities at polling places aren't a problem for me. As long as the judges are drawing bright lines, with equal protection under the law, sometimes even the most important values must be balanced in a conflict. You've answered the question, I just don't believe you. Of course you don't believe me. I don't fit into your neat little biases. Of course no liberal I've ever met fits your biases. Of course activty, as in actions, at polling places can be controlled. But simply standing in front wearing any garment that does not violate the electioneering rules? This has been the failure of your argument from the beginning. If the NBPP members had done anything that could be taken as intimidation or interference with the voting process then they could have been arrested and prosecuted. But they were simply standing out front of a polling place and they were not interacting with the voters in any way. When we start prosecuting people for wearing indentifiable clothes, no matter the venue, then we may as well toss the entire Constitiution
|