pahunkboy
Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006 From: Central Pennsylvania Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DarkSteven First off, a huge IF: The quoted article is from prison planet, which I consider less than reliable. So my response is IF the article is true (and that one of the HFTs was claiming to have never have had a losing day in four years, even on days that the market tanked, makes me think it's suspect). I don't consider high frequency trading to be beneficial to the market and the US as a whole. If there is a quirk in a program, it could crash the system more quickly than any human could realize that there's a problem. It also makes it damn tempting to do insider trading because forty transactions in a day, most worth a fraction of a percent, could be a very effective screen for the one illegal trade that nets a thirty percent gain. Normally, I'm against regulation. But I'd support something stating that electronic transactions would have to be held a minimum of half an hour while there would be no restrictions on human transactions that couldn't crash the whole system. I am afraid you do not grasp what it is. The big banks are INVESTMENT banks. This means they play with their own money. The software KNOWS what trade is asked for at what price. The house knows the bid/ask- and skims the price on EVERY TRANSACTION. There is no neutral party here. The brokerage/banks, pad the trades- in micro seconds- cause they own the software. By you claiming it is on the up and up- is you in essence saying YOU can beat the computer at chess. and you CANT. Think outside the box, Steven, do not sell yourself short on particularly this concept. The game is rigged.
|