quote:

ORIGINAL: inurtrash

Giving my Princess gifts and tributes is part of the relationship that we have, I feel good giving to her and she likes getting things. It's a fetish like any other. She's not a professional and doesn't do it as a living. Turning over my money is simply a part of serving her, just like doing housework or errands is. I don't really see the point of people making a problem of financial servitude even though they endorse other forms. I work for her at my job too.

quote:

ORIGINAL: submitting4U

I have a problem with financial domination, especially where the sub gets zilch and the web masters clean out your account.

quote:

ORIGINAL: stef

quote:

ORIGINAL: submitting4U

I have a problem with financial domination, especially where the sub gets zilch and the web masters clean out your account.

If they're getting zilch, why are they paying?  They must be getting something worthwhile out of it if they keep paying, right?  Some need is being satisfied.

~stef

quote:

ORIGINAL: submitting4U

Ok folks semantics here so i will call it financial exploitation and i define it as something (money) for nothing ...

quote:

ORIGINAL: SPIT00N

<<And if the sub is paying the Dom/me , who is actually in charge in a situation like that?? >>

1) The so-called sub is in control. He who pays the piper calls the tune.

I know quite a few who are financial dommes/doms. The ones on this site may be a bit sketchy, but the ones I know are very established in the online scene. They don't get naked for cash on cam, the people who give them money are for the most part genuinely interested in just handing over their money and are well aware that they are getting nothing in return, And that is what gets them off. To each his own.

2) It is not financial domination. It is prostitution and those making money out of it are prostitutes/escorts/rentboys. I have opinion against that, each according to their own but one has to condemn their dishonesty in polluting many a sub/dom site with their activities rather than being honest and paying for escorting sites where they are remarkably absent, no doubt probably barred.

According to Webster's legal dictionary, prostitution is defined as follows:

 Main Entry: pros·ti·tu·tion
Pronunciation: "präs-t&-'tü-sh&n, -'tyü-
Function: noun
:  the act or practice of engaging in sexual activity indiscriminately esp. for money; also :  the crime of engaging in such activity

And by poking around quite a few legal websites, actual physical contact needs to be made for it to be deemed prostitution, such as using an orifice.

So what I am getting from your views on what prostitution is, exotic dancers are prostitutes, those who work at peep shows that are behind the glass are prostitutes. By chance, do you think people who engage in pornography are prostitutes? I'm honestly just wondering.

And I'm not sure I understand the whole dishonesty part you are talking about. Most financial domination takes place online(where we are currently), and it is an act where a person is Dominant and the other person is submissive(fancy that, that applies to this site as well). People have a choice here as to who they chose to involve themselves with. And to my knowledge, an escort is a person who is paid for their company. When sex gets involved, of course, its illegal. However, and feel free to correct me if I'm wrong here, but aren't escorts physically present when administering their services? The only people who are dishonest are those that do a bait and switch. If a person knows what they are getting upfront, how is that dishonest?

3) Their terminology is absurd. I have lost count of the number of times I have been addressed as a "worthless faggot" by someone who is in the process of effectively begging from me after I put a personal ad in a personal section elsewhere. If you call me worthless them act like I am and take your hat to someone who you can acknowledge has the means to be charitable instead of getting someone else to live your lie.... most of the cash masters do it because they can't get a woman or a job.

I don't particularly agree with that practice of debasing another human being while trying to pry money out of them.

And this is just another honest inquiry, but have you by chance, asked these people who act this way if they cannot get a mate or a job? Or is this an assumption?

4) All they seem to offer is cam and feet. Cam is artificial and illusory, but foot worship? Come on, it's a cop out and if you look at all the subs you will see that foot worship is barely sought... come to think of it if you look at the doms the same applies, it is way down the list of priorities if at all.

Some people post on their profiles that cam and feet are what they are looking for. In my opinion, I don't believe its proper to group everybody that identifies as submissive in with what you are looking for and what you believe in.

The same applies to stereotypes. I am of African-American heritage- does that automatically mean that I love fried chicken and watermelon? (as a side note, i'm not fond of fried chicken at all, and the taste of watermelon makes me want to vomit)

Returning back to the prostitution/escorting thing I cannot understand why anybody pays these fakes because if you use a dominant escort you will actually get real value for money instead of staring into your webcam at some losers feet pretending you are with him when you are alone in your room.

Just because another person is interested in other things than what you are interested in, doesn't automatically deem them a fake. Like I stated before, there is the option of "online only" on profiles- some people look for that on collarme. Just hide and/or block the profiles that promote such activities if they bother you so much.

quote:

ORIGINAL: RedMagic1

Damn girl!  That answer was hotter than your pics.

Dick Gregory told a famous joke:

I was sitting in a restaurant about to eat some chicken.  I had picked up a knife and fork.  In came three brothers, you know the ones I mean, the brothers Ku, Klux and Klan.  They said, "Boy, enjoy your dinner, because anything you do to that chicken, we're going to do to you."  So I put down my knife and fork, I picked up the chicken... and I kissed it.

1961, baby.  That man had a pair.  He wrote an autobiography, with a one-word title that starts with N, but the spam filter will reject the post if I type it out.  It's an amazing book.

Meanwhile, spit00n, 100% of your posts so far are complaints and harangues.  Maybe if you schmoozed and flirted a bit more, you'd be rejected a bit less.

quote:

ORIGINAL: SPIT00N
Cam is artificial and illusory, but foot worship? Come on, it's a cop out and if you look at all the subs you will see that foot worship is barely sought...

quote:

ORIGINAL: SPIT00N

<<And if the sub is paying the Dom/me , who is actually in charge in a situation like that?? >>

1) The so-called sub is in control. He who pays the piper calls the tune.

quote:


2) It is not financial domination. It is prostitution and those making money out of it are prostitutes/escorts/rentboys. I have opinion against that, each according to their own but one has to condemn their dishonesty in polluting many a sub/dom site with their activities rather than being honest and paying for escorting sites where they are remarkably absent, no doubt probably barred.

quote:


3) Their terminology is absurd. I have lost count of the number of times I have been addressed as a "worthless faggot" by someone who is in the process of effectively begging from me after I put a personal ad in a personal section elsewhere. If you call me worthless them act like I am and take your hat to someone who you can acknowledge has the means to be charitable instead of getting someone else to live your lie.... most of the cash masters do it because they can't get a woman or a job.

quote:


4) All they seem to offer is cam and feet. Cam is artificial and illusory, but foot worship? Come on, it's a cop out and if you look at all the subs you will see that foot worship is barely sought... come to think of it if you look at the doms the same applies, it is way down the list of priorities if at all.

quote:


Returning back to the prostitution/escorting thing I cannot understand why anybody pays these fakes because if you use a dominant escort you will actually get real value for money instead of staring into your webcam at some losers feet pretending you are with him when you are alone in your room.