RE: Rand supporter stomp on womans head

RE: Rand supporter stomp on womans head (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Owner59 -> RE: Rand supporter stomp on womans head (10/26/2010 6:34:31 PM)
Yup, Assalt is assalt. The police report said she was on the ground and defenceless when stupity stompity stupidly stomped her.

Politesub53 -> RE: Rand supporter stomp on womans head (10/27/2010 3:47:51 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy The title of the thread is typically misleading. First, he pushed her down with his foot. You can argue about the defintion of "stomp" if you like, it doesnt meet mine. But it is absolutely clear that it wasnt her head, but her shoulders. What is absolutely clear to you, as always, isnt absolutely clear to everyone else. Stomp or not the guys heel was on her head and not her shoulder. Not that your opinion matters much, it will be what the Police and the Judge decide. What gets me is your rush to defend this jerk from attacking a woman.

rulemylife -> RE: Rand supporter stomp on womans head (10/27/2010 6:17:45 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy The title of the thread is typically misleading. First, he pushed her down with his foot. You can argue about the defintion of "stomp" if you like, it doesnt meet mine. But it is absolutely clear that it wasnt her head, but her shoulders. I hear you Willbeur. This is all overblown, it wasn't her head being stomped on, just her shoulders. Typical liberal overreaction. Hey, want to to talk about those scary New Black Panther guys?

pahunkboy -> RE: Rand supporter stomp on womans head (10/27/2010 9:26:36 AM)
Hog wash. It was not a supporter. Paul supporters are for gun rights, yet no gun was found.

cuckoldmepls -> RE: Rand supporter stomp on womans head (10/27/2010 9:31:43 AM)
So what you're saying is that politicians are now responsible for what some one else does even though they would never condone it or encourage it??? This is like blaming gun manufacturers for what murderers do. It makes no sense at all. It's also the equivalent of let's say you are the boss of a company, and your employee beats the hell out of someone while delivering packages, but yet you are responsible for it financially since he was on your time clock. Yep, this is what democrats are all about.

cuckoldmepls -> RE: Rand supporter stomp on womans head (10/27/2010 9:41:25 AM)
No one accepts personal responsibility in the democratic party. This is why they can spill their coffee on their lap, and blame McDonald's for their sensitive skin and clumsiness. Blaming an entire party or movement for what one or two people did is insane. Now on the lighter side, here's a comment I thought was funny on that :) Don't forget, republicans have been the victims many times themselves in incidents like this. "Now where can I get a Dumbocrat doormat? I tried Wal*Mart, Target and Dillards. Non of those places had 'em in stock."

RapierFugue -> RE: Rand supporter stomp on womans head (10/27/2010 9:46:10 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy The title of the thread is typically misleading. First, he pushed her down with his foot. You can argue about the defintion of "stomp" if you like, it doesnt meet mine. But it is absolutely clear that it wasnt her head, but her shoulders. What is absolutely clear to you, as always, isnt absolutely clear to everyone else. Stomp or not the guys heel was on her head and not her shoulder. Not that your opinion matters much, it will be what the Police and the Judge decide. What gets me is your rush to defend this jerk from attacking a woman. And a woman who was already restrained by someone else and posed no threat whatsoever. What a coward that man is. I hope the courts throw the book at him.

mnottertail -> RE: Rand supporter stomp on womans head (10/27/2010 9:58:07 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: cuckoldmepls No one accepts personal responsibility in the democratic party. This is why they can spill their coffee on their lap, and blame McDonald's for their sensitive skin and clumsiness. Don't forget, republicans have been the victims many times themselves in incidents like this. "Now where can I get a Dumbocrat doormat? I tried Wal*Mart, Target and Dillards. Non of those places had 'em in stock." First off Wal-Mart Republicans, Democrats are not selling us to China. Second, then you are willing to step up to the plate and claim Republican responsibility for balooning our deficits starting with the Reagan administration, right thru Bush,, and for invading countries and further robbing our treasury? Seems to me that Republicans NEVER take responsibility. Your standard schtick is 'Oh, he is only a RINO'. But you say that after running him up the flagpole for as long as you can. This is a reason why folks don't vote for them, because nobody, not even the party that claims them before they throw them under the bus know what sort of fuckheads they are. So, we await republican examples here of claiming personal responsibilty for bankrupting the country, invasions and the like.

Lucylastic -> RE: Rand supporter stomp on womans head (10/27/2010 10:02:26 AM)
Hunky... the fact that guns werent found or used is the only positive thing to come out o f this clusterfuck, and if that the best thing that can be said, its still pretty majorly clusterfuckish. next time someone might not be so lucky and dead cos a gun gets the point acros better??? is that what you want?

pogo4pres -> RE: Rand supporter stomp on womans head (10/27/2010 10:03:27 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: cuckoldmepls No one accepts personal responsibility in the democratic party. This is why they can spill their coffee on their lap, and blame McDonald's for their sensitive skin and clumsiness. Blaming an entire party or movement for what one or two people did is insane. Now on the lighter side, here's a comment I thought was funny on that :) Don't forget, republicans have been the victims many times themselves in incidents like this. "Now where can I get a Dumbocrat doormat? I tried Wal*Mart, Target and Dillards. Non of those places had 'em in stock." As usual another imbecile misquotes the McDonald's coffee case, well dipshit McDonalds lost because they kept their coffee at the utterly in-consumable temperature of 190 degrees. They were told to dial the temperature down, they refused as the hotter the coffee is kept the longer it stays "fresh" tasting. By way of example the very best Italian made espresso/cappuccino makers only BREW their coffee at roughly 160 degrees and the burner is set to roughly 130 to 140 degrees for storage. After showing callous indifference to the repeated warnings McDonald's got their asses sued, and every fucktard jumped on the decision as an example of "lawyers gone wild" ignoring the basic fact that the coffee was too hot for human consumption. Now none of this may make a fucking difference to your pointy little pin-head, but to real people in the real fucking world callous indifference is a punishable offense. Historically, Some Knucklehead in NJ

pahunkboy -> RE: Rand supporter stomp on womans head (10/27/2010 10:08:27 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic Hunky... the fact that guns werent found or used is the only positive thing to come out o f this clusterfuck, and if that the best thing that can be said, its still pretty majorly clusterfuckish. next time someone might not be so lucky and dead cos a gun gets the point acros better??? is that what you want? IMO it is cheap theatrics ment to sway the election. People really ought to become more discerning.

Lucylastic -> RE: Rand supporter stomp on womans head (10/27/2010 10:19:24 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail Second, then you are willing to step up to the plate and claim Republican responsibility for balooning our deficits starting with the Reagan administration, right thru Bush,, and for invading countries and further robbing our treasury? Seems to me that Republicans NEVER take responsibility. So, we await republican examples here of claiming personal responsibilty for bankrupting the country, invasions and the like. THIS I have never seen the repiblicans take responsibility for it Ron and believe me Ive looked.

Moonhead -> RE: Rand supporter stomp on womans head (10/27/2010 10:30:31 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: cuckoldmepls No one accepts personal responsibility in the democratic party. This is why they can spill their coffee on their lap, and blame McDonald's for their sensitive skin and clumsiness. What, that story which there was the huge fuss over back when the chimp was still in power the other year? How does an example of libertarian litigation have anything to do with the Democrat party?

tazzygirl -> RE: Rand supporter stomp on womans head (10/27/2010 10:33:46 AM)
quote: MO it is cheap theatrics ment to sway the election. People really ought to become more discerning. A woman was pushed to the ground, then had a boot applied to her head, and you find that cheap theatrics?

RapierFugue -> RE: Rand supporter stomp on womans head (10/27/2010 10:34:59 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail Seems to me that Republicans NEVER take responsibility. So, we await republican examples here of claiming personal responsibilty for bankrupting the country, invasions and the like. THIS I have never seen the repiblicans take responsibility for it Ron and believe me Ive looked. To be fair, you almost never see politicians (of any stripe) taking responsibility for anything they've done, be it getting a blow-job, knackering the country’s finances, failing to negotiate a narrow bridge when pissed off their faces, tapping phone lines and burglarising enemies, or rushing into insane wars. Now I'm trying to think of the last time I remember a politician taking responsibility for something negative they'd done, and failing dismally ... anyone? UK I'm thinking of, but US would be fine too. Obama’s “yes I inhaled, that was the whole point” admission wasn't really the same sort of thing as by then having smoked pot wasn't viewed as a major negative ...

tazzygirl -> RE: Rand supporter stomp on womans head (10/27/2010 10:35:36 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: cuckoldmepls No one accepts personal responsibility in the democratic party. This is why they can spill their coffee on their lap, and blame McDonald's for their sensitive skin and clumsiness. All the woman asked for was to have McDonalds pay for her medical bills. McDonalds refusal to accept responsibility made this case national news and ended up with them getting their asses sued.

Lucylastic -> RE: Rand supporter stomp on womans head (10/27/2010 10:35:59 AM)
[sm=lalala.gif]

Moonhead -> RE: Rand supporter stomp on womans head (10/27/2010 10:39:59 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RapierFugue quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail Seems to me that Republicans NEVER take responsibility. So, we await republican examples here of claiming personal responsibilty for bankrupting the country, invasions and the like. THIS I have never seen the repiblicans take responsibility for it Ron and believe me Ive looked. To be fair, you almost never see politicians (of any stripe) taking responsibility for anything they've done, be it getting a blow-job, knackering the country’s finances, failing to negotiate a narrow bridge when pissed off their faces, tapping phone lines and burglarising enemies, or rushing into insane wars. Now I'm trying to think of the last time I remember a politician taking responsibility for something negative they'd done, and failing dismally ... anyone? UK I'm thinking of, but US would be fine too. Obama’s “yes I inhaled, that was the whole point” admission wasn't really the same sort of thing as by then having smoked pot wasn't viewed as a major negative ... Isn't taking responsibility for everything that goes wrong in the country Clegg's job description? Cameron claims credit for anything that might be even vaguely creditable, and Clegg's left holding responsibility for the other. (I might feel sympathetic if he was less of a snivelling two faced cunt who's seen to it that his party's going to spend another thirty years in the wilderness the second the coalition collapses...)

RapierFugue -> RE: Rand supporter stomp on womans head (10/27/2010 10:49:02 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Moonhead Isn't taking responsibility for everything that goes wrong in the country Clegg's job description? Cameron claims credit for anything that might be even vaguely creditable, and Clegg's left holding responsibility for the other. (I might feel sympathetic if he was less of a snivelling two faced cunt who's seen to it that his party's going to spend another thirty years in the wilderness the second the coalition collapses...) Hmmmmm ... not 100% sure about that. As party leader he’s effectively sold-out his (but not necessarily his party’s) qualms about Tory behavior in exchange for (potential) electoral reform, or at least the chance of it. While I don't agree with what he’s done, or how he’s done it, I do think that a party leader is supposed to advance their party’s cause, even if it means they personally cop for some backlash. And of course he hasn’t actually taken responsibility for anything as yet. So he's not a great example. You have caused me to think of one example though, so cheers – when Prescott lamped that gobshite “protestor” who lobbed an egg at him he did say afterwards “of course I bloody thumped him!”, which I guess is about as straight as it gets. Although, thinking about it, one should probably disbar Prescott from this poll, as he’s always been especially cheerful about owning up to thumping people [:D]

Lucylastic -> RE: Rand supporter stomp on womans head (10/27/2010 10:50:09 AM)
Psst Rapier...Clinton did apologise...http://www.historyplace.com/speeches/clinton-rose-garden.htm but I get your point I wanna see more than a few apologise, ted heath, wilson, thatcher, kinnock, major, harper, mulroney, harris, trudeau, reagan, bush 1 &2 but im not holdin ma breath:)

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 4 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875