RE: Take Heart - The Nation Will Endure (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


PatrickG38 -> RE: Take Heart - The Nation Will Endure (11/2/2010 9:03:17 AM)

I am amused that many of those who pledge such fetishistic fidelity to their conception of the Constitution, seem to support term limits without being struck by the irony that the document has only the opposite, lifetime tenure for Federal judges. I do not care because I am not silly enough to think every good idea is in the Constitution any more then every good idea would be in any other single document, but to those who worship the founders like demigods, I wonder why you think they missed this.




kdsub -> RE: Take Heart - The Nation Will Endure (11/2/2010 9:04:35 AM)

Hi Patrick

This is a place to express opinion…but keep in mind your opinions define you to those reading them. Like it or not you will be classified by your statements …are you fanatical… can you be reasoned with…are you fair minded…are you balanced… are you intelligent… are you fun…It will all come down to are you worth listening to and talking with and will what you have to say matter to others?


There is something you can do to gauge how others will classify you but it takes a quiet place, a few minutes of time, and no distractions.

Relax…close your eyes…take a few deep breaths… now.. do you see it…it is beautiful…shinny… warm…glowing… it is the possibility that you may be wrong.

As long as you can at least find this possibility then there is hope for you here on CM.

Butch




PatrickG38 -> RE: Take Heart - The Nation Will Endure (11/2/2010 9:16:21 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

Hi Patrick

This is a place to express opinion…but keep in mind your opinions define you to those reading them. Like it or not you will be classified by your statements …are you fanatical… can you be reasoned with…are you fair minded…are you balanced… are you intelligent… are you fun…It will all come down to are you worth listening to and talking with and will what you have to say matter to others?


There is something you can do to gauge how others will classify you but it takes a quiet place, a few minutes of time, and no distractions.

Relax…close your eyes…take a few deep breaths… now.. do you see it…it is beautiful…shinny… warm…glowing… it is the possibility that you may be wrong.

As long as you can at least find this possibility then there is hope for you here on CM.

Butch


Not sure of your point? What am I wrong about?




FirmhandKY -> RE: Take Heart - The Nation Will Endure (11/2/2010 10:16:18 AM)

quote:

Original: PatrickG38

Not sure of your point? What am I wrong about?

Have you ever been wrong before, in your entire life?  Does that possibility exist?

Firm




PatrickG38 -> RE: Take Heart - The Nation Will Endure (11/2/2010 10:20:27 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

Original: PatrickG38

Not sure of your point? What am I wrong about?

Have you ever been wrong before, in your entire life?  Does that possibility exist?

Firm



I have and the possibility continues to exist.




FirmhandKY -> RE: Take Heart - The Nation Will Endure (11/2/2010 10:32:50 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PatrickG38


quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

Original: PatrickG38

Not sure of your point? What am I wrong about?

Have you ever been wrong before, in your entire life?  Does that possibility exist?

Firm



I have and the possibility continues to exist.

Good.  A ray of light.

Is there a possibility that any of your ideas about the vacuous, hateful, racist, greedy nature of all Republicans, and all conservatives may not always be right, as well?

Or are all their ideas from a place of evil and hatred?  Is every single one of them who oppose any policy or program that you like essentially evil shitbags who do not deserve to breath the same air as the more intelligent and enlightened folk of the world, i.e. people who agree with you?

Firm




PatrickG38 -> RE: Take Heart - The Nation Will Endure (11/2/2010 10:48:56 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: PatrickG38


quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

Original: PatrickG38

Not sure of your point? What am I wrong about?

Have you ever been wrong before, in your entire life?  Does that possibility exist?

Firm



I have and the possibility continues to exist.

Good.  A ray of light.

Is there a possibility that any of your ideas about the vacuous, hateful, racist, greedy nature of all Republicans, and all conservatives may not always be right, as well?

Or are all their ideas from a place of evil and hatred?  Is every single one of them who oppose any policy or program that you like essentially evil shitbags who do not deserve to breath the same air as the more intelligent and enlightened folk of the world, i.e. people who agree with you?

Firm



Those are not my ideas that you place in my mouth. The word ‘all’ is powerful and I have never claimed all of any group could merit such epithets. Indeed, such a thought would be repugnant. Many republicans and conservatives are good people and show it every day (did not my original post state that television amplifies the fools). Nevertheless, there is a significant segment that is motivated by such epithets and the movement, like say Nativism, seems tarnished by that (I suspect not every member of the Know Nothing party was a bad person, but I would also suspect it was significantly above average). I think this country desperately needs a reasoned conservative voice (I know you will hate this, but a voice that competes with Obama’s in calm and tone) willing to help address deep problems. Yet, even very conservative and honorable politicians like Sen. Bennett of Utah are attacked for their very reasonableness.
I enjoy talking with conservatives as it helps sharpen my thinking; I have proposed that every President should have an Office of Devil’s Advocate staffed by ideological, but not personal, opponents. I do not know if you saw the removed posts, but when people start talking about killing someone for speaking his mind, it reflects so poorly on everyone (even if that is unfair).
It is sad that we all constantly talk past each other, but you cannot argue President Obama raised taxes too much when he lowered them for most and raised them for none because it is very hard to have a conversation without a good faith respect for reality. In conclusion, I did vote for a Republican today (Harry Wilson, Comptroller of NY State).




FirmhandKY -> RE: Take Heart - The Nation Will Endure (11/2/2010 11:18:31 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PatrickG38

Those are not my ideas that you place in my mouth. The word ‘all’ is powerful and I have never claimed all of any group could merit such epithets. Indeed, such a thought would be repugnant. Many republicans and conservatives are good people and show it every day (did not my original post state that television amplifies the fools). Nevertheless, there is a significant segment that is motivated by such epithets and the movement, like say Nativism, seems tarnished by that (I suspect not every member of the Know Nothing party was a bad person, but I would also suspect it was significantly above average). I think this country desperately needs a reasoned conservative voice (I know you will hate this, but a voice that competes with Obama’s in calm and tone) willing to help address deep problems. Yet, even very conservative and honorable politicians like Sen. Bennett of Utah are attacked for their very reasonableness.

I enjoy talking with conservatives as it helps sharpen my thinking; I have proposed that every President should have an Office of Devil’s Advocate staffed by ideological, but not personal, opponents. I do not know if you saw the removed posts, but when people start talking about killing someone for speaking his mind, it reflects so poorly on everyone (even if that is unfair).

It is sad that we all constantly talk past each other, but you cannot argue President Obama raised taxes too much when he lowered them for most and raised them for none because it is very hard to have a conversation without a good faith respect for reality. In conclusion, I did vote for a Republican today (Harry Wilson, Comptroller of NY State).

Good post, Patrick.

A corollary presents itself:

Some conservatives and Republicans may hold high ideals/principles and have logical thoughts which lead them to their positions or actions.

Another mirrored thought:

Some liberals and Democrats may hold high ideals/principles and have logical thoughts which lead them to their positions and actions.

As well, the inverse is likely true as well:

Some liberals and Democrats may be petty, greedy, evil etc, etc, etc.

So, theoretically are we still on the same path?

Firm




PatrickG38 -> RE: Take Heart - The Nation Will Endure (11/2/2010 12:27:07 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: PatrickG38

Those are not my ideas that you place in my mouth. The word ‘all’ is powerful and I have never claimed all of any group could merit such epithets. Indeed, such a thought would be repugnant. Many republicans and conservatives are good people and show it every day (did not my original post state that television amplifies the fools). Nevertheless, there is a significant segment that is motivated by such epithets and the movement, like say Nativism, seems tarnished by that (I suspect not every member of the Know Nothing party was a bad person, but I would also suspect it was significantly above average). I think this country desperately needs a reasoned conservative voice (I know you will hate this, but a voice that competes with Obama’s in calm and tone) willing to help address deep problems. Yet, even very conservative and honorable politicians like Sen. Bennett of Utah are attacked for their very reasonableness.

I enjoy talking with conservatives as it helps sharpen my thinking; I have proposed that every President should have an Office of Devil’s Advocate staffed by ideological, but not personal, opponents. I do not know if you saw the removed posts, but when people start talking about killing someone for speaking his mind, it reflects so poorly on everyone (even if that is unfair).

It is sad that we all constantly talk past each other, but you cannot argue President Obama raised taxes too much when he lowered them for most and raised them for none because it is very hard to have a conversation without a good faith respect for reality. In conclusion, I did vote for a Republican today (Harry Wilson, Comptroller of NY State).

Good post, Patrick.

A corollary presents itself:

Some conservatives and Republicans may hold high ideals/principles and have logical thoughts which lead them to their positions or actions.

Another mirrored thought:

Some liberals and Democrats may hold high ideals/principles and have logical thoughts which lead them to their positions and actions.

As well, the inverse is likely true as well:

Some liberals and Democrats may be petty, greedy, evil etc, etc, etc.

So, theoretically are we still on the same path?

Firm


Completely agreed




slvemike4u -> RE: Take Heart - The Nation Will Endure (11/2/2010 1:00:50 PM)

Wait a minute ...the Nation is/was in danger?




CreativeDominant -> RE: Take Heart - The Nation Will Endure (11/2/2010 1:05:07 PM)

And if you are on the same path as Firm, then you realize that when you use a term such as a "significant number" it indicates that your thinking is along those lines.  Yet where is the proof?  I have yet to see any numbers on just how many people in The Tea Party movement are backward-thinking.  Just as I have yet to see any distinctive numbers on just how many in the Democratic party are further to the left of our President. 

Because there is no such study.  There is nothing to back up that statement other than conjecture and drawn assumptions.  Assumptions are colored by who and what we are.  You are of a progressive nature, Patrick...your words prove that.  So any idea that is different from yours is going to be seen as backwards or wrong...and that is also indicated by your words.  That is what someone meant earlier when they posted to you the question about ever having been wrong.  You state you have but I would also be willing to bet that it has not been because you looked at a liberal idea and discarded it for a more moderate or conservative way of thought on a particular matter...it was because you were not progressive enough in your thinking, to yours' or others' way of thought.

Many conservatives are like me...like Firm...like Merc...we enjoy making money and we enjoy having that money to use as we see fit.  We don't mind contributing to the national defense and the general welfare...we DON'T like being told how to life our lives because the government KNOWS better and is going to take care of us despite ourselves.  Like eating for example...through regulation of restaurants and food suppliers to the extent of no trans-fats, a limitation on the amount of processed sugar that can be used in certain food and drink, etc...




PatrickG38 -> RE: Take Heart - The Nation Will Endure (11/2/2010 1:10:40 PM)

I do not understnad your comment?




DomYngBlk -> RE: Take Heart - The Nation Will Endure (11/2/2010 1:17:32 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

And if you are on the same path as Firm, then you realize that when you use a term such as a "significant number" it indicates that your thinking is along those lines.  Yet where is the proof?  I have yet to see any numbers on just how many people in The Tea Party movement are backward-thinking.  Just as I have yet to see any distinctive numbers on just how many in the Democratic party are further to the left of our President. 

Because there is no such study.  There is nothing to back up that statement other than conjecture and drawn assumptions.  Assumptions are colored by who and what we are.  You are of a progressive nature, Patrick...your words prove that.  So any idea that is different from yours is going to be seen as backwards or wrong...and that is also indicated by your words.  That is what someone meant earlier when they posted to you the question about ever having been wrong.  You state you have but I would also be willing to bet that it has not been because you looked at a liberal idea and discarded it for a more moderate or conservative way of thought on a particular matter...it was because you were not progressive enough in your thinking, to yours' or others' way of thought.

Many conservatives are like me...like Firm...like Merc...we enjoy making money and we enjoy having that money to use as we see fit.  We don't mind contributing to the national defense and the general welfare...we DON'T like being told how to life our lives because the government KNOWS better and is going to take care of us despite ourselves.  Like eating for example...through regulation of restaurants and food suppliers to the extent of no trans-fats, a limitation on the amount of processed sugar that can be used in certain food and drink, etc...


You seem confused. On one hand you don't want the government making "knowing" better than you. Then on the other you are completely ok with them telling you that you need a national defense and general welfare. Why are you letting them "Know" better on those issues and not the rest?




FirmhandKY -> RE: Take Heart - The Nation Will Endure (11/2/2010 1:34:12 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk

You seem confused. On one hand you don't want the government making "knowing" better than you. Then on the other you are completely ok with them telling you that you need a national defense and general welfare. Why are you letting them "Know" better on those issues and not the rest?


I'm not sure that your comments are better called a false dilemma, or the fallacy of the undistributed middle.

Firm




lockedaway -> RE: Take Heart - The Nation Will Endure (11/2/2010 1:35:47 PM)

You guys (fellow conservatives) are all confused.  You will never make a liberal understand that raises taxes causes unemployment and reduced consumer spending.  FORGET ABOUT IT!.  You will never make a liberal understand that raising capital gains taxes devalues the sale of ANY asset.  FORGET THAT TOO.  Let's take something simple like selling your house:

Under Republicans:
Buy a house for $500,000.00 and sell it for $700,000.00.  Because of Republicans, your capital gains taxes are 15% and so you pay $30,000.00 to the Fed.  See how simple?  Arguably there should be no such thing as capital gains taxes because you already paid taxes on the money it took to buy the asset.

Under Democrats:
Capital gains taxes will go up to 20% and for the same $200,000.00 profit, you will pay $40,000.00.  But wait, there's more.  Because of Obama Care, if you are single and sell your house for a profit of $250,000.00, you are charged an additional 3.8% sales tax on the sale of your home.  The same thing applies to a couple that sells for a $500,000.00 profit.  Profits like those aren't too hard to realize on the East and West coasts of this country.  And then, of course, you have to pay your applicable state taxes.

But wait, there's more.  Under Democrats, an estate valued at 1,000,000.00 will suffer an estate tax of 55%.  So for all of these people that cry about the working poor (you know who they are, people that were made poor by the decisions of the Federal government with NAFTA and the like...which was in part a response to the power of unions), think about the dirt poor farmers whose only asset is their land, which they have to mortgage every year to cover expenses and then hope their crop pays down that loan.  The children of those farmers will have to sell the farm just to pay the taxes.

To liberals, everything I have said above is fair and reasonable.




PatrickG38 -> RE: Take Heart - The Nation Will Endure (11/2/2010 1:37:19 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant

And if you are on the same path as Firm, then you realize that when you use a term such as a "significant number" it indicates that your thinking is along those lines.  Yet where is the proof?  I have yet to see any numbers on just how many people in The Tea Party movement are backward-thinking.  Just as I have yet to see any distinctive numbers on just how many in the Democratic party are further to the left of our President. 

Because there is no such study.  There is nothing to back up that statement other than conjecture and drawn assumptions.  Assumptions are colored by who and what we are.  You are of a progressive nature, Patrick...your words prove that.  So any idea that is different from yours is going to be seen as backwards or wrong...and that is also indicated by your words.  That is what someone meant earlier when they posted to you the question about ever having been wrong.  You state you have but I would also be willing to bet that it has not been because you looked at a liberal idea and discarded it for a more moderate or conservative way of thought on a particular matter...it was because you were not progressive enough in your thinking, to yours' or others' way of thought.

Many conservatives are like me...like Firm...like Merc...we enjoy making money and we enjoy having that money to use as we see fit.  We don't mind contributing to the national defense and the general welfare...we DON'T like being told how to life our lives because the government KNOWS better and is going to take care of us despite ourselves.  Like eating for example...through regulation of restaurants and food suppliers to the extent of no trans-fats, a limitation on the amount of processed sugar that can be used in certain food and drink, etc...


There are numerous polls about the Tea Party and the believes and ignorance of many (but not all) of their members, but that is rather meaningless as I am judging based on what the various Tea Party entities say or do in their public pronouncement.
As to your pronouncement that conservative like making money, that is just silly. Almost all people like making money; although, almost all would agree that if making money were your highest concern in life that would be pretty greedy (and most conservatives I know do NOT lead their lives so shallowly). I would probably agree that I am generally progressive and far to the left of the contemporary American center, but that is meaningless to the strength (or weakness) of my argument.
The issue of money as you see fit is a serious one to address and I will try although I imagine it may not be appreciated. On a surface level, no one wants to pay for something he does not support. It is no joy that my tax dollars went to a foolish war and provide massive corporate welfare to security and weapons contractors (waste that President Obama and Secretary Gates have tried to fight), but I am a citizen of the same nation as you and these decisions were made through a legitimate process (albeit one that is somewhat corrupt and needs improving) so my money should go for it as yours should go for a program you do not support. That is the essential nature of a democratic republic and is part of the compact that makes us one people. More the point, you only have money because there is a government providing value to the currency and protecting your right to retain it (this is even true of such currencies as gold, absent a market supported by government’s willingness to treat gold as type of currency, it would also be worthless for anything but looking pretty and conducting electricity). I know people do not like to think this deeply, but almost everything you do and have is made possible by government action (try owning land without legal title, moving a product without roads, canals, railroads, do you think near universal literacy was achieved through private initiative, maybe you do not like seatbelts, but many lives including those of conservatives have been saved by them, how long to you think your wealth would last if the government did not threaten the liberty of those who might take it). We are no longer a nation of autarkic farmers and never completely were. This is why libertarianism always fails and almost no one truly accepts its principles to their logical conclusion. No one want higher taxes, mature people however understand that roads, ports, museums, libraries, schools, armies, airports, clean air and water, prisons, rural electrification, etc, must be paid for and that to pay them is an honor because we should all value a first world nation, liberal, conservative and everyone in between. If I had to distill my critique of modern American conservatism to a sound bite, I might say it lacks honor and maturity in its policies. I know those are pretty lost virtues, but they are not unimportant. I want my taxes higher if it means the next generation will have better schools, but I do not want to be the only one willing. It is after all We the people, not Me the center of the world.




PatrickG38 -> RE: Take Heart - The Nation Will Endure (11/2/2010 1:39:07 PM)

As for trans-fats, I generally agree that nanny state rules are silly (although not all). They are usually products of local governments, not the Federal.




lockedaway -> RE: Take Heart - The Nation Will Endure (11/2/2010 1:41:35 PM)

Life time tenure for judges is also an outmoded concept.  The first president to try to "stack the court" in an effort to make his political views live long past his administration was FDR.  Once that game started being played, the judicial system became just as subverted and perverted as the rest.




DomYngBlk -> RE: Take Heart - The Nation Will Endure (11/2/2010 1:59:39 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PatrickG38

As for trans-fats, I generally agree that nanny state rules are silly (although not all). They are usually products of local governments, not the Federal.


So it is not good that a Gov't try to educate and protect the public against things that are harmful? Then you'd agree that traffic signs and speed limits and laws are wasteful gov't spending?




PatrickG38 -> RE: Take Heart - The Nation Will Endure (11/2/2010 2:12:32 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk

quote:

ORIGINAL: PatrickG38

As for trans-fats, I generally agree that nanny state rules are silly (although not all). They are usually products of local governments, not the Federal.


So it is not good that a Gov't try to educate and protect the public against things that are harmful? Then you'd agree that traffic signs and speed limits and laws are wasteful gov't spending?


I said not all. Generally, I do not want the government telling me what I can eat although I (and even many conservatives) support education and guidelines like the food pyramid. It would actually be much more effective if we simply stopped subsidizing unhealthy food though corn subsidies (a lot of conservatives may join me in this) and had kids play more outside rather than sit in front of a computer or television. As for things like speed limits, I (and I gather most conservatives are as well) am in favor although I wished sincerely we all lived in a place where people used their common sense and possessed decent driving skills so we would not need them. Honestly, the conservatives would have much better argument if people managed to behave in a smarter more courteous and less selfish manner. As an example I do not want the government telling me what car model to buy, but I very much do want them setting high fuel efficiency standards to encourage both environmental protection, national security and innovation (so that we have cars like the Porsche 911 Carrera S, 385 hp, 26 highway mpg, and this kind of efficiency is appearing in American models). There must be a balance.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875