RE: The "General Welfare" clause

RE: The "General Welfare" clause (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

thompsonx -> RE: The "General Welfare" clause (11/5/2010 11:38:28 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail I knew a General Westmoreland once, never a General Welfare. Did the suck have one? Actually the suck does have a "general welfare". It is called "navy relief" and I had the occasion to see it in action more than once. A pfc and his wife and baby lost their home to a fire one night and after morning formation he went to navy relief and before noon he had a new apartment,furniture,clothes, food and $200 cash which was about two and a half months pay in 1962 for a pfc. The whole thing was a gift not a loan. No red tape, no hassels, no drama, just general welfare at its very best.

tazzygirl -> RE: The "General Welfare" clause (11/5/2010 11:38:33 AM)
Honey, if you are on line as much as you are.... lol

Real0ne -> RE: The "General Welfare" clause (11/5/2010 11:42:14 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail I knew a General Westmoreland once, never a General Welfare. Did the suck have one? Actually the suck does have a "general welfare". It is called "navy relief" and I had the occasion to see it in action more than once. A pfc and his wife and baby lost their home to a fire one night and after morning formation he went to navy relief and before noon he had a new apartment,furniture,clothes, food and $200 cash which was about two and a half months pay in 1962 for a pfc. The whole thing was a gift not a loan. No red tape, no hassels, no drama, just general welfare at its very best. let me correct that for you *No red tape, no hassels, no drama, just general welfare* at its very best.**

thompsonx -> RE: The "General Welfare" clause (11/5/2010 11:43:01 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne You asked 3 questions not one. You do not like the existing system. Its NOT about ME The system is unlawful You have no idea how to fix the existing system. Sure I do I already stated the same. Would that be a fair characterization of your position? NO as if it was not obvious. Please notice the two periods and the question mark. In english that makes two statements and one question. Your answer was not obvious to me thus my several request for a simple yes/no response.

Real0ne -> RE: The "General Welfare" clause (11/5/2010 11:44:22 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Honey, if you are on line as much as you are.... lol yeh I admit I pissed away the greater part of today didnt I but then I can do the work anytime so whatever LOL.

thompsonx -> RE: The "General Welfare" clause (11/5/2010 11:48:35 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail I knew a General Westmoreland once, never a General Welfare. Did the suck have one? Actually the suck does have a "general welfare". It is called "navy relief" and I had the occasion to see it in action more than once. A pfc and his wife and baby lost their home to a fire one night and after morning formation he went to navy relief and before noon he had a new apartment,furniture,clothes, food and $200 cash which was about two and a half months pay in 1962 for a pfc. The whole thing was a gift not a loan. No red tape, no hassels, no drama, just general welfare at its very best. let me correct that for you *No red tape, no hassels, no drama, just general welfare* at its very best.** No correction necessary since it was a phrased response to ron based on the "double entendre" with the word "general". It is a pity that that nuance escaped you.

Real0ne -> RE: The "General Welfare" clause (11/5/2010 11:50:11 AM)
on the contrary you completely missed the point. I gave you the benefit of a doubt since my only other option was to call bullshit on your 2 claimed statements and incorrect interpretation of what I stated and the quoted constitutions and other quotes I posted that clearly should have pointed that out the meaning and intent to you. either way your titanic is doomed to sink makes no difference to me (neither did general escape me) obviously LOL

Musicmystery -> RE: The "General Welfare" clause (11/5/2010 12:27:53 PM)
General Warfare was indeed promoted--gave him extra stars... At the expense of General Welfare.

Real0ne -> RE: The "General Welfare" clause (11/5/2010 12:35:18 PM)
nm

DMFParadox -> RE: The "General Welfare" clause (11/6/2010 7:48:43 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: DMFParadox I agree. I've been really impressed with the changes in our education system, up and down the line. Better schools, better classroom procedures, better books, better standardsIn that area, at least, the future looks bright. Of course, with all the other problems they'll have, they'll need that education... What country are you talking about? This U.S. of A, mac. It's a checkerboard nightmare still as to benefiting from the improvements if you're livin' in the wrong color square, especially in mid-level education like what they used to call 'middle school', but they've been progressing for a while.

Page: << < prev 2 3 4 5 [6]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

3.222656E-02