RE: $57 per vote & unmitigated greed.

RE: $57 per vote & unmitigated greed. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

rulemylife -> RE: $57 per vote & unmitigated greed. (11/5/2010 7:21:03 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Fellow I do not see why it is so negative to spend your own money in an effort to make a positive difference in country's life? How can you beat establishment candidate without sufficient funds? Some democrats have done it. No problem in these cases? What is wrong is that who gets elected has come down to who has, or can raise, the most money. Which is why it was nice not too see that happen here.

popeye1250 -> RE: $57 per vote & unmitigated greed. (11/5/2010 8:28:13 AM)
If I had that kind of money I wouldn't be living in Calif. and I'd be hiring nice looking porn starlets to "work around the house."

slvemike4u -> RE: $57 per vote & unmitigated greed. (11/5/2010 8:33:14 AM)
There you go pops....nothing at all momentous to your dreams.Just simple pleasures for a simple man [8\|]

chiaThePet -> RE: $57 per vote & unmitigated greed. (11/5/2010 9:23:02 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: rulemylife What is wrong is that who gets elected has come down to who has, or can raise, the most money. Would that include the 2008 Presidential election? chia* (the pet)

truckinslave -> RE: $57 per vote & unmitigated greed. (11/5/2010 9:43:46 AM)
One person is known to have broken multiple laws. That person entered the country illegally, committed fraud/perjury when she was hired, and used a social security number not her own. But, none of it could be her fault. Surely not. She's the victim. Seriously. What planet?

mnottertail -> RE: $57 per vote & unmitigated greed. (11/5/2010 9:49:45 AM)
No, two. Meg Whitman broke them plain and simple as well. (read them, you'll see)

Dominatist -> RE: $57 per vote & unmitigated greed. (11/5/2010 9:57:44 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: truckinslave One person is known to have broken multiple laws. That person entered the country illegally, committed fraud/perjury when she was hired, and used a social security number not her own. But, none of it could be her fault. Surely not. She's the victim. Seriously. What planet? I don't post here much but I can't let this pass. Yes, she is a victim of the capitalist oligarchs in Mexico where after their last default it was revealed that 80% of the mexican population made no more than $9 a day and because 20 years later...they still make about $9 a day...she had to move here just to try and survive. NAFTA simply being a profit center for American capitalists, did nothing for Mexican labor or American jobs. So she comes here, cannot afford an immigration lawyer takes what she can get where both parties are breaking the fucking law, so we blame the poor woman, fire her ass, pretend not to know her (anymore) and we are what...supposed to give the rich billionaire American capitalist a pass even to the tune of all of those crazy Calif. voters who would have her governor. Why am I not surprised ?

wilddreams17 -> RE: $57 per vote & unmitigated greed. (11/5/2010 10:27:12 AM)
in less civilized countries this is called corruption

rulemylife -> RE: $57 per vote & unmitigated greed. (11/5/2010 10:57:26 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: popeye1250 If I had that kind of money I wouldn't be living in Calif. and I'd be hiring nice looking porn starlets to "work around the house." If you want porn starlets that's exactly where you should be living. San Fernando's Open Secret (AP) In the vast, suburban expanse of the San Fernando Valley, one of the largest industries thrives quietly inside unmarked warehouses, walled estates and hidden studios. In fact, some locals call it "San Pornando Valley." The region is home to most of America's pornography industry - videos, Web sites, phone sex businesses, adult toys and even the old-fashioned dirty magazine.

rulemylife -> RE: $57 per vote & unmitigated greed. (11/5/2010 11:11:40 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: chiaThePet quote: ORIGINAL: rulemylife What is wrong is that who gets elected has come down to who has, or can raise, the most money. Would that include the 2008 Presidential election? chia* (the pet) Yes.

mnottertail -> RE: $57 per vote & unmitigated greed. (11/5/2010 11:13:36 AM)
Well, at least she didn't spend 200 million to stay at the Taj Mahal. LOL.

Lucylastic -> RE: $57 per vote & unmitigated greed. (11/5/2010 12:23:39 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: truckinslave One person is known to have broken multiple laws. That person entered the country illegally, committed fraud/perjury when she was hired, and used a social security number not her own. But, none of it could be her fault. Surely not. She's the victim. Seriously. What planet? Ignorance is one of your better traits

Musicmystery -> RE: $57 per vote & unmitigated greed. (11/5/2010 12:26:04 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: rulemylife quote: ORIGINAL: servantforuse So what . This is a free Country. She can spend her money as she wishes. Government by the wealthy for the wealthy? Welcome to the 18th century. From there, same old...

truckinslave -> RE: $57 per vote & unmitigated greed. (11/5/2010 12:42:20 PM)
quote: Yes, she is a victim of the capitalist oligarchs in Mexico where after their last default it was revealed that 80% of the mexican population made no more than $9 a day and because 20 years later...they still make about $9 a day If we really wanted to help the Mexican people we would set about changing the regime, and kill the drug cartels in the process.

Musicmystery -> RE: $57 per vote & unmitigated greed. (11/5/2010 12:45:37 PM)
That's what we need. More military spending and stretching our resources even further. You people watch too many movies and skipped too many economics classes.

truckinslave -> RE: $57 per vote & unmitigated greed. (11/5/2010 1:22:23 PM)
MM, I didn't say I wanted to do it. I frankly don't care much about conditions in Mexico. If they lack the cajones my forefathers did, well, that's their problem. If they want to change their condition, we drew up the battle plan. But if you care about the plight of the Mexican people, the thing to do is to change conditions in Mexico. Which extends into a real challenge. Conditions are worsening in most of South America, and populations are growing. The flood of illegals/refuges headed northward can reasonably be expected to grow into a tsunami. I'm talking not about people looking just for work, but for food.... The fence may eventually need integrated gun towers.

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125