India trip revisited (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Lucylastic -> India trip revisited (11/5/2010 7:06:26 PM)

http://www.cnn.com/video/?/video/bestoftv/2010/11/04/ac.obamas.india.trip.cost2.mov.cnn

I Love it [:-][:'(][:-][:'(][:'(]where are the retractions, where are the "im wrong" statements?
paranoia and unhinged twats jumping on any rumour and not fact checking?
can we say major clusterfuck of clusterfuck proportions




TreasureKY -> RE: India trip revisited (11/5/2010 7:10:26 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

http://www.cnn.com/video/?/video/bestoftv/2010/11/04/ac.obamas.india.trip.cost2.mov.cnn

I Love it [:-][:'(][:-][:'(][:'(]where are the retractions, where are the "im wrong" statements?
paranoia and unhinged twats jumping on any rumour and not fact checking?
can we say major clusterfuck of clusterfuck proportions



Did you have a legitimate question, or are you just baiting?  [;)]




Musicmystery -> RE: India trip revisited (11/5/2010 7:15:49 PM)

Looks like she caught one already!




slvemike4u -> RE: India trip revisited (11/5/2010 7:17:31 PM)

Sorry Treasure,but given the three(count'em three) threads started here by some of our more erstwhile malcontents....trumpeting the $200 million a day,3,000 people strong entourage,I don't see this as baiting...I see it as a legitimate question.
Now where are,at the least,our three thread starters.....and in case anyone has forgotten who I referrence...I believe it was hunky,the ever inquisitive servant.....and that paragon of understanding and temperance truckin ?




truckinslave -> RE: India trip revisited (11/5/2010 7:17:48 PM)

I referenced "reports I've read" in my OP.
Those reports were wrong.
Selah.




slvemike4u -> RE: India trip revisited (11/5/2010 7:20:30 PM)

So be extension you were wrong...in not questioning the validity of those sources(lack of critical thinking) or of checking further.
Tell us truckin would you have so readily believed such a fanciful claim if it hadn't validated your wellknown distaste for this administration?




FirmhandKY -> RE: India trip revisited (11/5/2010 7:25:10 PM)

FR:

Ok, the India trip revisited:

Maharashtra CM, No. 2 may skip Obama meet over checks
Prafulla Marpakwar, TNN, Nov 5, 2010, 01.04am IST

UMBAI: Miffed by the US consulate demanding personal details like birth date, nationality and passport number, Maharashtra's top politicians and bureaucrats have decided to pay it back in the same currency. While the home minister and the home secretary have declined to attend an event graced by President Barack Obama, four others, including chief minister Ashok Chavan and deputy chief minister Chhagan Bhujbal, are mulling the same.

"We are shocked over the tone of the invitation letter. (US consul general Paul) Folmsbee expects Chavan and Bhujbal to produce their identity cards before entering the venue. They have been asked to submit their details like date of birth, nationality, passport and PAN to the consulate," said a senior official on condition of anonymity. "We feel that this is no way to treat the chief minister of a state. Chavan and Bhujbal are undecided on whether to attend the event."

Seems like this administration is as tone deaf in international affairs as they are to the will of the American people.

Firm




TreasureKY -> RE: India trip revisited (11/5/2010 7:25:46 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Sorry Treasure,but given the three(count'em three) threads started here by some of our more erstwhile malcontents....trumpeting the $200 million a day,3,000 people strong entourage,I don't see this as baiting...I see it as a legitimate question.
Now where are,at the least,our three thread starters.....and in case anyone has forgotten who I referrence...I believe it was hunky,the ever inquisitive servant.....and that paragon of understanding and temperance truckin ?


lol... Expecting some here to admit when they are wrong is naive at best.  If this thread is directed toward those thread starters, asking for a retraction while calling them paranoid and unhinged twats is just... well... crazy.  [:)]




TreasureKY -> RE: India trip revisited (11/5/2010 7:27:18 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Looks like she caught one already!


Who got caught?  [;)]




truckinslave -> RE: India trip revisited (11/5/2010 7:44:41 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

So be extension you were wrong...in not questioning the validity of those sources(lack of critical thinking) or of checking further.
Tell us truckin would you have so readily believed such a fanciful claim if it hadn't validated your wellknown distaste for this administration?


Yes, that's correct; I was wrong by extension.
"Fanciful" may be too strong a word (and "distatste" to mild, btw). 0bama0s people are furiously dodging questions as we write. The trip is evidently over the top, the only question being a question of by how much.




slvemike4u -> RE: India trip revisited (11/5/2010 7:57:46 PM)

There you go...admit you were wrong,but explain to us that it was just a matter of degree.....got to love you guys(or at least you...lol)one step foward and two back.
By the way I will give you props for admitting you were wrong...though you ualified the hell out of it.Fonzie had an easier time with this sort of admission [:)]




Lucylastic -> RE: India trip revisited (11/5/2010 8:45:27 PM)

Truck, for all our differences, the fact that you said you were wrong..actually does mean something, I appreciate you saying it.. Ididnt expect it, its true, but you owned it, and that is a definite plus.

Treasure... you know baiting only to well ..if the cap fits wear it




Politesub53 -> RE: India trip revisited (11/6/2010 2:37:03 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

They have been asked to submit their details like date of birth, nationality,

Firm



Dont tell me the right hasve flip flopped over birth certificates and its now wrong to ask to see one  [8D]




Politesub53 -> RE: India trip revisited (11/6/2010 2:47:07 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave


Yes, that's correct; I was wrong by extension.
"Fanciful" may be too strong a word (and "distatste" to mild, btw). 0bama0s people are furiously dodging questions as we write. The trip is evidently over the top, the only question being a question of by how much.



Did you watch Lucys link ? Obamas spokesman says the costs compare with those for Presidents Bush and Clinton. A Pentagon official said the notion 34 navy ships were covering the trip was comical. I dont see that as dodging questions.




dreamysubmale -> RE: India trip revisited (11/6/2010 4:28:03 AM)

Don’t forget the 40 planes too.

It’s more like 200 million Rupees a day, which is more feasible in US dollars.

Honestly, what person on their right mind would believe such outrageous claims?




Lucylastic -> RE: India trip revisited (11/6/2010 4:42:15 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TreasureKY
lol... Expecting some here to admit when they are wrong is naive at best.  If this thread is directed toward those thread starters, asking for a retraction while calling them paranoid and unhinged twats is just... well... crazy.  [:)]


you didnt watch the link.....bachmann, beck, limbaugh, ...= unhinged paranoid twats.
The retractions should come from them not the people who buy their crap without checking, altho yes questioning their information would be helpful..
Ive been on the interwebz 16 years, I am far from naive. It wasnt based on the thread starters, just to make it clear. I would have gone back to those threads and mentioned it there.
Careful with your assumptions.





TreasureKY -> RE: India trip revisited (11/6/2010 4:56:08 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

you didnt watch the link.....bachmann, beck, limbaugh, ...= unhinged paranoid twats.
The retractions should come from them not the people who buy their crap without checking, altho yes questioning their information would be helpful..
Ive been on the interwebz 16 years, I am far from naive. It wasnt based on the thread starters, just to make it clear. I would have gone back to those threads and mentioned it there.
Careful with your assumptions.


Did you read slvemike4u's comment that I was responding to?

Did you note that my comment quoted him?

Did you see that my post had "(in reply to slvemike4u)" at the bottom?

lol... Telling me "you didnt watch the link"???

Who has assumed what here? 

Just sayin'...  [;)]




Lucylastic -> RE: India trip revisited (11/6/2010 4:58:51 AM)

I gave you the benefit of the doubt.. you proved me right..just sayin[8|]




TreasureKY -> RE: India trip revisited (11/6/2010 7:58:04 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

I gave you the benefit of the doubt.. you proved me right..just sayin[8|]



lol... What nonsense.




Lucylastic -> RE: India trip revisited (11/6/2010 8:00:14 AM)

oh what a crushing defeat, sobs..
[sm=alien.gif]




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875