RE: Medicaid Withdrawal? Or all hat and no cattle? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Musicmystery -> RE: Medicaid Withdrawal? Or all hat and no cattle? (11/7/2010 3:23:25 PM)

Opting out is a 30 year old option. Why did it take this long?

Seems to me you'd have to run one hell of a good program to replace it--off the top, you'd have to save MORE than 60% just to break even.

So if they're at all serious, what they really mean is "the poor and elderly are on their fucking own" -- just like before when poverty was a national crisis.

Ah, the good old days!

Oh, by the way---taxes were also MUCH higher back then too......





willbeurdaddy -> RE: Medicaid Withdrawal? Or all hat and no cattle? (11/7/2010 3:27:21 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Opting out is a 30 year old option. Why did it take this long?

Seems to me you'd have to run one hell of a good program to replace it--off the top, you'd have to save MORE than 60% just to break even.

So if they're at all serious, what they really mean is "the poor and elderly are on their fucking own" -- just like before when poverty was a national crisis.

Ah, the good old days!

Oh, by the way---taxes were also MUCH higher back then too......



there was no "national crisis", that was created by Medicaid




slvemike4u -> RE: Medicaid Withdrawal? Or all hat and no cattle? (11/7/2010 3:34:45 PM)

Are you insane...prior to such social programs as Social Security and Madicaid et al.....there certainly was a national crisis....lets put it this way,have you ever heard of bread lines....soup kitchens?
Though we still have them they are not so prevalent in our New Deal,great society reality are they ?
And why did you ignore Tims mention that taxes were higher back then?
You are so blinded by your mena spirited ideology that you would deny the most obvious of truths.




TreasureKY -> RE: Medicaid Withdrawal? Or all hat and no cattle? (11/7/2010 9:36:45 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Are you insane...prior to such social programs as Social Security and Madicaid et al.....there certainly was a national crisis....lets put it this way,have you ever heard of bread lines....soup kitchens?
Though we still have them they are not so prevalent in our New Deal,great society reality are they ?
And why did you ignore Tims mention that taxes were higher back then?
You are so blinded by your mena spirited ideology that you would deny the most obvious of truths.


Ummm... the national crisis that prompted the New Deal was the great depression that began in October 1929.   Yes, there was a proverty and unemployment crisis at that time.  Unemployment rose to nearly 24% by 1932.  Medicare and Medicaid, however, were not started until 1965.  At that time, unemployment was around 5% and I don't believe we were having any national financial crisis at that time, though about 22% of the population was at or below the poverty level.

As far as Tim's assertion that taxes were higher back then, he didn't really specify what he meant by "back then".  If he meant during the depression when there was a poverty crisis, then no... taxes were much lower.  If he meant during the time Medicare and Medicaid were started, then yes, they were higher.  However, his claim that taxes were "MUCH higher" is a bit of an exaggeration.

To give you an idea on how taxes have changed since the depression, I give you the following comparison based on what would be a $200,000 per year income today:

1929   The year the great depression started
$16,286 with Federal Income Tax (FIT) rate of 8%

1934  A year into the New Deal
$12,571 with FIT of 12%

1938  The end of the New Deal era
$13,708 with FIT of 12% and SS of 1% on first $3000 (averages to 12.2%)

1964 The year before Medicare and Medicaid
$29,412 with FIT of 41% and SS of 3.625 of first $6600 (averages to 42%)

1966 A year into Medicare and Medicaid
$30,303 with FIT of 39% and SS of 3.85% and Medic of .35% (averages to 40%)

1980 The year Ronald Reagan took office
$72,993 with FIT of 54% and SS of 5.08% and Medic of 1.05% (averages to 56%)

1983 After Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 and Tax Equity & Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982
$93,023 with FIT of 48% and SS of 5.4% and Medic of 1.3% (averages to 51%)

2008 Latest date that reliable and easily linked data is available
$200,000 with FIT of 28% and SS of 6.2% and Medic of 1.45% (averages to 32%)

So, yeah... taxes in 1964 would have been about 42% whereas in 2008 they were only 32%.  But after 1964, the tax rate rose steadily and reached a peak of 56% by 1980.

You can thank Ronnie now.  [;)]

I wonder how they'll trend for 2010 and beyond...

Resources:
Inflation Calculator
Tax Rates
Social Security and Medicare Rates
OASDI Limits
Unemployment Rates





tazzygirl -> RE: Medicaid Withdrawal? Or all hat and no cattle? (11/7/2010 9:36:46 PM)

mike, this is the same person who believes Medicaid covers all poor and that the poor can get health care without insurance or money.




Musicmystery -> RE: Medicaid Withdrawal? Or all hat and no cattle? (11/8/2010 4:37:01 AM)

quote:

though about 22% of the population was at or below the poverty level.


THIS is the relevant point, of course--it was an anti-poverty program.

quote:

As far as Tim's assertion that taxes were higher back then, he didn't really specify what he meant by "back then"


Obviously, when the program was started.

quote:

1964 The year before Medicare and Medicaid
$29,412 with FIT of 41% and SS of 3.625 of first $6600 (averages to 42%)

1966 A year into Medicare and Medicaid
$30,303 with FIT of 39% and SS of 3.85% and Medic of .35% (averages to 40%)

2008 Latest date that reliable and easily linked data is available
$200,000 with FIT of 28% and SS of 6.2% and Medic of 1.45% (averages to 32%)

So, yeah... taxes in 1964 would have been about 42% whereas in 2008 they were only 32%.


So taxes were 31.25% higher in 1964 than 2008.

Since you brought up Ronnie, in 1980, the poverty rate was 13%, but in 1982 hit a 15 year high, at 14%, and again in 1983, at 15.2%. I doubt any of those people will want to "thank Ronnie."

In 1993 the poverty rate was 15.1 percent.
Between 1993 and 2000, the poverty rate fell each year, reaching 11.3 percent in 2000.

It rose again during the Bush years--in 2009, 14.3 percent of all persons lived in poverty.





Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125