Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

How Ben Bernanke Sentenced The Poorest 20% Of The Population To A Cold, Hungry Winter The followi


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> How Ben Bernanke Sentenced The Poorest 20% Of The Population To A Cold, Hungry Winter The followi Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
How Ben Bernanke Sentenced The Poorest 20% Of The Popul... - 11/7/2010 3:52:52 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
How Ben Bernanke Sentenced The Poorest 20% Of The Population To A Cold, Hungry Winter The following chart prepared recently by JPMorgan demonstrates something rather scary, and makes it all too clear how the Chairman’s plan to “assist” the US population via some imaginary “wealth effect” due to QE2, is about to backfire.
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: How Ben Bernanke Sentenced The Poorest 20% Of The P... - 11/7/2010 3:54:59 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
Even Greenspan Admits that Moral Hazard and Fraud are the Main Problems

Even Alan Greenspan is confirming what William Black, James Galbraith, Joseph Stiglitz, George Akerlof and many other economists and financial experts
have been saying for a long time: the economy cannot recover if fraud is not prosecuted and if the big banks know that government will bail them out every time they get in trouble. Specifically, Greenspan said today in a panel discussion at a Fed conference in Jekyll Island, Georgia (where the plans to form the Fed were originally hatched):
Banks operated with less capital because of an assumption they would be rescued by the government, he said. Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. wouldn’t have failed with adequate capital, he said. “Rampant fraud” was also an issue, he said. Lack of Trust “Fraud creates very considerable instability in competitive markets,” Greenspan said. “If you cannot trust your counterparties, it would not work.”
Greenspan is right. As leading economist Anna Schwartz, co-author of the leading book on the Great Depression with Milton Friedman, told the Wall Street journal in 2008:
“The Fed … has gone about as if the problem is a shortage of liquidity. That is not the basic problem. The basic problem for the markets is that [uncertainty] that the balance sheets of financial firms are credible.” So even though the Fed has flooded the credit markets with cash, spreads haven’t budged because banks don’t know who is still solvent and who is not. This uncertainty, says Ms. Schwartz, is “the basic problem in the credit market. Lending freezes up when lenders are uncertain that would-be borrowers have the resources to repay them. So to assume that the whole problem is inadequate liquidity bypasses the real issue.” *** Today, the banks have a problem on the asset side of their ledgers — “all these exotic securities that the market does not know how to value.” “Why are they ‘toxic’?” Ms. Schwartz asks. “They’re toxic because you cannot sell them, you don’t know what they’re worth, your balance sheet is not credible and the whole market freezes up. We don’t know whom to lend to because we don’t know who is sound. So if you could get rid of them, that would be an improvement.”
  Similarly, Robert Reich wrote in 2008:
The underlying problem isn’t a liquidity problem. As I’ve noted elsewhere, the problem is that lenders and investors don’t trust they’ll get their money back because no one trusts that the numbers that purport to value securities are anything but wishful thinking. The trouble, in a nutshell, is that the financial entrepreneurship of recent years — the derivatives, credit default swaps, collateralized debt instruments, and so on — has undermined all notion of true value. Many of these fancy instruments became popular over recent years precisely because they circumvented financial regulations, especially rules on banks’ capital adequacy. Big banks created all these off-balance-sheet vehicles because they allowed the big banks to carry less capital.
  Nothing has changed since 2008 … the problem is still exactly the same. The fraud committed by the giant banks – including mortgage fraud, encouraging appraisal fraud, fraud in representing the soundness of mortgages packaged together into mortgage backed securities, the rating of financial instruments, the numerous types of accounting fraud (repo 105s being just one example) – have continued. No big fish have been prosecuted. No wonder no one trusts anyone else. And the government has rewarded the looting by bailing out the bad actors again and again, either directly or through various backdoor schemes. ( And many economic writers believe that quantitative easing itself is just another bailout). Even Alan Greenspan is calling out fraud and moral hazard. As I noted in April, Greenspan has been a a die-hard neoclassical or “free market” economist:
Alan Greenspan didn’t think regulators should even pay any attention to fraud:
He didn’t believe that fraud was something that needed to be enforced or was something that regulators should worry about, and he assumed she [Brooksley Born] probably did. And of course she did. I’ve never met a financial regulator who didn’t feel that fraud was part of their mission, but that was her introduction to Alan Greenspan.”
Indeed, as Born pointed out last year, Greenspan told her:
I don’t think there is any need for a law against fraud.
However, Greenspan started changing his tune somewhat in April, and his remarks today reinforce his apparent change of philosophy (a change which is as dramatic as the recantation by Judge Richard Posner – one of the leading proponents over the course of many decades for removing the reach of the law from the economy – of his anti-regulatory stance). Admittedly, talk is cheap, and I’m not sure how much influence former Fed chairs like Greenspan and Volcker have on Bernanke or other sitting officials. As I asked in April: “Fraud [is] finally being discussed in polite company … now where are the prosecutions?”

< Message edited by pahunkboy -- 11/7/2010 3:55:42 PM >

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: How Ben Bernanke Sentenced The Poorest 20% Of The P... - 11/7/2010 5:25:20 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
Gold, Silver Surge After Goldman Recommends Buying Gold... Again 

Gold continues its push to $1,400. The catalyst: Goldman's David Greely has just released a report on gold saying that: "we expect that gold prices will continue to rise over the next 12 months to our $1650/toz target as US monetary policy remains accommodative and US real interest rates remain low. Further, the Federal Reserve’s return to quantitative easing and the movement of gold prices to these new record highs could spark renewed investor demand for gold, which has been remarkably subdued in recent months. This represents upside risk to both our forecasts and to gold prices." As Goldman's last call on gold marked a temporary peak in the appreciation, as weexpected, this time the top ticking effect will likely be lost. We believe that $1,400 gold to be breached as soon as today.Some other perspectives from Goldman:
The FOMC announcement was widely anticipated, but while it was largely priced into the US TIPS market, it was not priced into the gold market. As we discussed in our last report, 10-year US TIPS yields had fallen to under 50 bps off the growing prospect of another round of quantitative easing. While speculative long positions had been building from arguably “oversold” levels, they were not building rapidly enough given the sharp decline in US TIPS yields, leaving the gold market arguably “under-bought.”We expect that the post-FOMC announcement rally that has carried gold prices close to our 3-month $1400/toz target has been driven by a sharp increase in net speculative positions, and we expect that ultimately, net speculative long positions will rise to a record 37 million toz given that US TIPS yields are below 50 bps.
Greely's specific recommendations are as follows:
Consumers: We expect gold prices to continue to rise from current levels as real interest rates should remain low on a continuation of quantitative easing in the United States. As a result, we believe that current gold prices provide an opportunity for consumers to layer in upside protection. However, longer term we continue to see considerable downside risk should the US Federal Reserve tighten monetary policy earlier than expected. Consequently, we recommend near-dated consumer hedges in gold, but more so in platinum where recovering global automobile demand will likely continue to put upward pressure on auto-catalyst demand and therefore on platinum and palladium prices.

Producers: While we expect gold prices to increase in 2010 and 2011, the rising risk of declining gold prices once the US Federal Reserve begins tightening monetary policy suggests this is a good time for gold producers to begin scaled up hedging of forward production, particularly for calendar 2012 and beyond.
While we agree, we see no mention of the RICO lawsuit on gold and silver prices, which even CNBC acknowledged is a factor in PM prices courtesy of the LBMA short squeeze we discussed yesterday, which has sent silver into the stratosphere.Full report (pdf).

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 3
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> How Ben Bernanke Sentenced The Poorest 20% Of The Population To A Cold, Hungry Winter The followi Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.063