Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: So what will the purists call this these... lentil burners???


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: So what will the purists call this these... lentil burners??? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: So what will the purists call this these... lentil ... - 11/11/2010 2:28:26 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline
400 cc lmao. May as well have a moped.

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to hertz)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: So what will the purists call this these... lentil ... - 11/11/2010 2:35:04 PM   
hertz


Posts: 1315
Joined: 8/7/2010
Status: offline
That's the trouble with some of you - you think it's all about size, but actually, performance is where it's at.

0-60 in under 4 seconds and 130mph are not really in lmao territory.

What is in lmao territory is a stupidly heavy machine that can only round a bend at walking pace. Now that's funny!

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: So what will the purists call this these... lentil ... - 11/11/2010 2:42:05 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: hertz

It doesn't matter if it can or not. Your Harley is the same as any other Harley - put a corner in the way, and it's dead in the water.

Hey, you take your drag bike and I'll even race you to the shop on a moped. First back home with a four-pack wins.


OK, let's talk about that cornering.

harley-davidson xr 1200 + flattrack racing


Motorcycle Racing Action



(in reply to hertz)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: So what will the purists call this these... lentil ... - 11/11/2010 2:54:39 PM   
hertz


Posts: 1315
Joined: 8/7/2010
Status: offline
Who are you trying to kid? We were talking, originally, about the sorts of bikes anyone might buy, and about Harleys being assembled in India. Now suddenly, the 400cc Japanese bike you think is so funny has to be compared with heavily modified track bikes and specialist machines?

You need to face facts. Harley makes horrible fucking fashion items with antique engines and a horrible tendency to shake a person's fillings out. They are slow, and heavy, and they don't go around corners. There isn't a single bike in the Harley range with any real performance behind it. Harley Davidson is a big fat joke. The only people bothering with Harleys nowadays are the frail and elderly, whose reflexes are more than a match for anything Harley can throw at them.

Seriously guys, get a life. And if you're a Harley fan, please don't describe yourself as a motorcycle enthusiast. You're not. You're an antique collector.




< Message edited by hertz -- 11/11/2010 2:55:36 PM >

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: So what will the purists call this these... lentil ... - 11/11/2010 3:06:02 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: hertz

Who are you trying to kid? We were talking, originally, about the sorts of bikes anyone might buy, and about Harleys being assembled in India. Now suddenly, the 400cc Japanese bike you think is so funny has to be compared with heavily modified track bikes and specialist machines?

You need to face facts. Harley makes horrible fucking fashion items with antique engines and a horrible tendency to shake a person's fillings out. They are slow, and heavy, and they don't go around corners. There isn't a single bike in the Harley range with any real performance behind it. Harley Davidson is a big fat joke. The only people bothering with Harleys nowadays are the frail and elderly, whose reflexes are more than a match for anything Harley can throw at them.

Seriously guys, get a life. And if you're a Harley fan, please don't describe yourself as a motorcycle enthusiast. You're not. You're an antique collector.





Got news for ya, that so-called heavily modified motorcycle was available to the general public in the same form it was used for flat-track racing.

(in reply to hertz)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: So what will the purists call this these... lentil ... - 11/11/2010 3:25:00 PM   
hertz


Posts: 1315
Joined: 8/7/2010
Status: offline
I'd be happy to see it in a face-off against a 400cc Japanese bike, if that's what you want to hear.

I found some figures for your Hardly.

0-60 in 4.5 seconds (a bit slow off the mark compared with the superior and much smaller 400cc Japanese bike), quarter mile in 13.11 seconds (quite a bit slower than the funny 400cc Japanese bike at 12.1 seconds), top speed 120mph, which would be respectable if it were a tourer rather than a flat-track 'racer' (the Japanese 400cc can reach just about 130).

I think even the 20 year old collectors item I had would be in with a shot against this particular 'race' bike. You must be very proud.

Now tell me 'it's all about image' - that's all you have left. Still laughing?

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: So what will the purists call this these... lentil ... - 11/11/2010 3:34:40 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
Well, I'm glad you found them.

But until I get to see them they mean little.

Not that I am doubting you, because I'm sure your word is a good as your taste in motorcycles. 

(in reply to hertz)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: So what will the purists call this these... lentil ... - 11/11/2010 3:45:04 PM   
RapierFugue


Posts: 4740
Joined: 3/16/2006
From: London, England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: hertz

I'd be happy to see it in a face-off against a 400cc Japanese bike, if that's what you want to hear.

I found some figures for your Hardly.

0-60 in 4.5 seconds (a bit slow off the mark compared with the superior and much smaller 400cc Japanese bike), quarter mile in 13.11 seconds (quite a bit slower than the funny 400cc Japanese bike at 12.1 seconds), top speed 120mph, which would be respectable if it were a tourer rather than a flat-track 'racer' (the Japanese 400cc can reach just about 130).

I think even the 20 year old collectors item I had would be in with a shot against this particular 'race' bike. You must be very proud.

Now tell me 'it's all about image' - that's all you have left. Still laughing?



Flat-track is a red herring in any case. Harleys haven't been competitive in any road racing series for a long, long time. The AMA organisers bent the rules backwards, forwards and sideways to try and make them competitive in AMA Superbikes & Superstocks, but the problem they faced is that any regs that favour a Harley also tends to favour other, better-built and faster Italian V-twins.

Harley engines are basically 40+ year old designs, and even adding water cooling and suchlike (as with the V-rod) doesn't alter that fact.

Any even halfway decent rider on a modern sports bike, on the road, or a tarmac track, will destroy a Harley. They're about image, and weekend warriors getting their kicks. That's fine as far as it goes, and I've no objection to it, but anyone attempting to position Harleys as a credible sports machine instantly becomes a laughing stock, for reasons anyone who's ever ridden a modern Japanese or Italian sportsbike will understand. Even Harley themselves don't try to make that assertion, because they know they'd get laughed out of court. The V-Rod is "the first member of a new family of performance custom motorcycles", where "performance custom" equals "looks like the old shit, goes slightly better than the old shit, still gets its arse kicked every time it comes to a corner". 115 bhp may sound a lot, but when you're riding litrebikes it's a joke - my current one makes 160 bhp at the crank, and more importantly weighs 168 Kg, wet, as opposed to the V-Rod's 304 Kg, wet.

I've ridden just about every road bike going over the last 25 years (including a V-Rod), raced a bit, and regularly do trackdays - Harleys are fine for what they are, as posing machines, and again as I say there's nothing wrong with that, but anyone even trying to pretend they're a credible sports machine is going to end up looking very, and I mean very, silly.

And speaking of silly, how gaylord is this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FPqkCxV8SkI

"Never in the field of human bullshit ..."

(in reply to hertz)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: So what will the purists call this these... lentil ... - 11/11/2010 4:12:12 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RapierFugue

Flat-track is a red herring in any case. Harleys haven't been competitive in any road racing series for a long, long time. The AMA organisers bent the rules backwards, forwards and sideways to try and make them competitive in AMA Superbikes & Superstocks, but the problem they faced is that any regs that favour a Harley also tends to favour other, better-built and faster Italian V-twins.

Harley engines are basically 40+ year old designs, and even adding water cooling and suchlike (as with the V-rod) doesn't alter that fact.

Any even halfway decent rider on a modern sports bike, on the road, or a tarmac track, will destroy a Harley. They're about image, and weekend warriors getting their kicks. That's fine as far as it goes, and I've no objection to it, but anyone attempting to position Harleys as a credible sports machine instantly becomes a laughing stock, for reasons anyone who's ever ridden a modern Japanese or Italian sportsbike will understand. Even Harley themselves don't try to make that assertion, because they know they'd get laughed out of court. The V-Rod is "the first member of a new family of performance custom motorcycles", where "performance custom" equals "looks like the old shit, goes slightly better than the old shit, still gets its arse kicked every time it comes to a corner". 115 bhp may sound a lot, but when you're riding litrebikes it's a joke - my current one makes 160 bhp at the crank, and more importantly weighs 168 Kg, wet, as opposed to the V-Rod's 304 Kg, wet.

I've ridden just about every road bike going over the last 25 years (including a V-Rod), raced a bit, and regularly do trackdays - Harleys are fine for what they are, as posing machines, and again as I say there's nothing wrong with that, but anyone even trying to pretend they're a credible sports machine is going to end up looking very, and I mean very, silly.

And speaking of silly, how gaylord is this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FPqkCxV8SkI

"Never in the field of human bullshit ..."


Speaking of bullshit.

Let me try and understand all this.

Harleys won't corner and somehow their cornering in flat-track racing is a red herring.

Harleys are slow yet somehow have managed to win for of the last six NHRA championships.

You guys keep up the good work, very convincing.

(in reply to RapierFugue)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: So what will the purists call this these... lentil ... - 11/11/2010 4:25:06 PM   
RapierFugue


Posts: 4740
Joined: 3/16/2006
From: London, England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: RapierFugue

Flat-track is a red herring in any case. Harleys haven't been competitive in any road racing series for a long, long time. The AMA organisers bent the rules backwards, forwards and sideways to try and make them competitive in AMA Superbikes & Superstocks, but the problem they faced is that any regs that favour a Harley also tends to favour other, better-built and faster Italian V-twins.

Harley engines are basically 40+ year old designs, and even adding water cooling and suchlike (as with the V-rod) doesn't alter that fact.

Any even halfway decent rider on a modern sports bike, on the road, or a tarmac track, will destroy a Harley. They're about image, and weekend warriors getting their kicks. That's fine as far as it goes, and I've no objection to it, but anyone attempting to position Harleys as a credible sports machine instantly becomes a laughing stock, for reasons anyone who's ever ridden a modern Japanese or Italian sportsbike will understand. Even Harley themselves don't try to make that assertion, because they know they'd get laughed out of court. The V-Rod is "the first member of a new family of performance custom motorcycles", where "performance custom" equals "looks like the old shit, goes slightly better than the old shit, still gets its arse kicked every time it comes to a corner". 115 bhp may sound a lot, but when you're riding litrebikes it's a joke - my current one makes 160 bhp at the crank, and more importantly weighs 168 Kg, wet, as opposed to the V-Rod's 304 Kg, wet.

I've ridden just about every road bike going over the last 25 years (including a V-Rod), raced a bit, and regularly do trackdays - Harleys are fine for what they are, as posing machines, and again as I say there's nothing wrong with that, but anyone even trying to pretend they're a credible sports machine is going to end up looking very, and I mean very, silly.

And speaking of silly, how gaylord is this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FPqkCxV8SkI

"Never in the field of human bullshit ..."


Speaking of bullshit.

Let me try and understand all this.

Harleys won't corner and somehow their cornering in flat-track racing is a red herring.

Harleys are slow yet somehow have managed to win for of the last six NHRA championships.

You guys keep up the good work, very convincing.



*sigh*

Flat-track is a *tiny*, race-only market. No-one else is putting major money into preparing a competing bike. Yamaha and Kawasaki both dominated the series for years (about 30 years ago, giving rise to such later road racers as Kenny Roberts Snr), before deciding it wasn't worth the expenditure, and pulling out, leaving Harley to their tiny niche market "racing" success.

It's a red herring because, if you remove that series, and look at tarmac, or off-road/MX, Harleys win nothing. Not a sausage.

Bugger all.

It's like saying JAP/JAWA/etc are brilliant bikes because they win speedway - it's a very niche series, with very specifically prepared bikes. Which bear zero resemblance to anything you could ride on the street.

On tarmac, on the road or track, Harleys get eaten alive. Unlike you I've ridden both, and trust me they do. A BSB/WSB spec litrebike will lap Snetterton in about 1m08s. A road based litrebike in about 1m15s, in the right hands (mine, for example). A Japanese 400 manages it in about 1m20s, as Snet is a horsepower track, and the fastest I've ever seen any Harley go round there (a V-Rod ridden by a very skilled racing buddy of mine) was 1m 25s - it weighs way too much to be able to corner effectively. Even Niall MacKenzie (ex GP racer and faster than almost anyone else on planet earth outside the current MotoGP field) only managed a 1m23s on a heavily race prepared XBR, last time out.

As you don't seem to know WTF you're talking about, even so far as which racing series is which, or even the difference between purpose built race bikes and road machines, you could do worse than ride both types of machine on either the road or track, then come back and say sorry.

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: So what will the purists call this these... lentil ... - 11/11/2010 4:38:21 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RapierFugue


*sigh*

Flat-track is a *tiny*, race-only market. No-one else is putting major money into preparing a competing bike. Yamaha and Kawasaki both dominated the series for years (about 30 years ago, giving rise to such later road racers as Kenny Roberts Snr), before deciding it wasn't worth the expenditure, and pulling out, leaving Harley to their tiny niche market "racing" success.

It's a red herring because, if you remove that series, and look at tarmac, or off-road/MX, Harleys win nothing. Not a sausage.

Bugger all.

It's like saying JAP/JAWA/etc are brilliant bikes because they win speedway - it's a very niche series, with very specifically prepared bikes. Which bear zero resemblance to anything you could ride on the street.

On tarmac, on the road or track, Harleys get eaten alive. Unlike you I've ridden both, and trust me they do. A BSB/WSB spec litrebike will lap Snetterton in about 1m08s. A road based litrebike in about 1m15s, in the right hands (mine, for example). A Japanese 400 manages it in about 1m20s, as Snet is a horsepower track, and the fastest I've ever seen any Harley go round there (a V-Rod ridden by a very skilled racing buddy of mine) was 1m 25s - it weighs way too much to be able to corner effectively. Even Niall MacKenzie (ex GP racer and faster than almost anyone else on planet earth outside the current MotoGP field) only managed a 1m23s on a heavily race prepared XBR, last time out.

As you don't seem to know WTF you're talking about, even so far as which racing series is which, or even the difference between purpose built race bikes and road machines, you could do worse than ride both types of machine on either the road or track, then come back and say sorry.


I'll second that sigh, because no matter what I present to you guys you dismiss it, as your minds are already made up and there is no changing what you believe.

But I'll try one more time.  And I'm sure you know, but just in case, Buell is Harley's sportbike subsidiary.


http://www.buell.com/en_us/racing/racing-news/detail.asp?news

Millville, NJ -- (Sunday, September 06, 2009) Bruce Rossmeyer’s Daytona Racing/RMR/GEICO Powersports rider Danny Eslick made history today by clinching the 2009 AMA Pro Road Racing Daytona SportBike championship at New Jersey Motorsports Park, his own and Buell Motorcycle Company’s first professional AMA road racing championship.






< Message edited by rulemylife -- 11/11/2010 4:47:04 PM >

(in reply to RapierFugue)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: So what will the purists call this these... lentil ... - 11/11/2010 4:44:54 PM   
RapierFugue


Posts: 4740
Joined: 3/16/2006
From: London, England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife
But I'll try one more time.  And I'm sure you know, but just in case, Buell is Harley's sportbike subsidiary.



Not any more it isn't. Harley are shutting Buell down. Because their bikes weren't competitive in the sportsbike arena. And a Buell was not a Harley. Not according to the FIM, or to Harley themselves. And that "series" was the one I referred to about heavily weighted regs.

I'm not bothering with this any further. You haven't the faintest idea what you're talking about, and a few minutes on google won't help you. I've ridden these things, and you haven't. Go away, learn about road and track riding (should take about 15-20 years to do properly), race in several series, ride dozens of road bikes of various capacities and capabilities, then come back and admit you’re clueless.

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: So what will the purists call this these... lentil ... - 11/11/2010 4:50:09 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RapierFugue


quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife
But I'll try one more time.  And I'm sure you know, but just in case, Buell is Harley's sportbike subsidiary.



Not any more it isn't. Harley are shutting Buell down. Because their bikes weren't competitive in the sportsbike arena. And a Buell was not a Harley. Not according to the FIM, or to Harley themselves. And that "series" was the one I referred to about heavily weighted regs.

I'm not bothering with this any further. You haven't the faintest idea what you're talking about, and a few minutes on google won't help you. I've ridden these things, and you haven't. Go away, learn about road and track riding (should take about 15-20 years to do properly), race in several series, ride dozens of road bikes of various capacities and capabilities, then come back and admit you’re clueless.



Well, it's always nice talking to someone who lets his pomposity overwhelm his common sense.

It gives me a fresh perspective on life.

Edited to add:

Buell is part of Harley-Davidson, which sort of makes you saying that Harley has said it is not a Harley, well........sort of stupid.

News | Harley-Davidson USAFeb 9, 2009 ... Buell Motorcycle Company, a subsidiary of Harley-Davidson, Inc., produces sport motorcycles, motorcycle parts, accessories and apparel. ...


Harley-Davidson Buell

< Message edited by rulemylife -- 11/11/2010 5:06:51 PM >

(in reply to RapierFugue)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: So what will the purists call this these... lentil ... - 11/11/2010 4:55:38 PM   
RapierFugue


Posts: 4740
Joined: 3/16/2006
From: London, England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: RapierFugue


quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife
But I'll try one more time.  And I'm sure you know, but just in case, Buell is Harley's sportbike subsidiary.



Not any more it isn't. Harley are shutting Buell down. Because their bikes weren't competitive in the sportsbike arena. And a Buell was not a Harley. Not according to the FIM, or to Harley themselves. And that "series" was the one I referred to about heavily weighted regs.

I'm not bothering with this any further. You haven't the faintest idea what you're talking about, and a few minutes on google won't help you. I've ridden these things, and you haven't. Go away, learn about road and track riding (should take about 15-20 years to do properly), race in several series, ride dozens of road bikes of various capacities and capabilities, then come back and admit you’re clueless.



Well, it's always nice talking to a pompous ass.

It gives me a fresh perspective on life.



That's better - you just sit there, being wrong, glorying on your wrong-ness, and spout insults. That's perfectly fine.

Just don't pretend to knowledge you don't, and glaringly obviously don't, have, when adults who know what they're talking about are in the room.

It’d be like me trying to tell a brain surgeon about how to do brain surgery. I’d end up looking as silly as you just have. Well ok, not quite as silly as you just have, but close.

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: So what will the purists call this these... lentil ... - 11/11/2010 5:12:38 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RapierFugue

That's better - you just sit there, being wrong, glorying on your wrong-ness, and spout insults. That's perfectly fine.

Just don't pretend to knowledge you don't, and glaringly obviously don't, have, when adults who know what they're talking about are in the room.

It’d be like me trying to tell a brain surgeon about how to do brain surgery. I’d end up looking as silly as you just have. Well ok, not quite as silly as you just have, but close.



Gee Skippy, correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure you were the one who started with the insults and then continued to escalate them because you are God's gift to motorcycling.

You know all and have done all, and the rest of of us are mere peons in your presence.

< Message edited by rulemylife -- 11/11/2010 5:13:31 PM >

(in reply to RapierFugue)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: So what will the purists call this these... lentil ... - 11/11/2010 5:17:42 PM   
RapierFugue


Posts: 4740
Joined: 3/16/2006
From: London, England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: RapierFugue

That's better - you just sit there, being wrong, glorying on your wrong-ness, and spout insults. That's perfectly fine.

Just don't pretend to knowledge you don't, and glaringly obviously don't, have, when adults who know what they're talking about are in the room.

It’d be like me trying to tell a brain surgeon about how to do brain surgery. I’d end up looking as silly as you just have. Well ok, not quite as silly as you just have, but close.



Gee Skippy, correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure you were the one who started with the insults and then continued to escalate them because you are God's gift to motorcycling.

You know all and have done all, and the rest of of us are mere peons in your presence.


Heh. Nice attempt at deflection. Lame, but nice.

You're wrong. Just sit there, shut the fuck up, and be wrong.

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: So what will the purists call this these... lentil ... - 11/12/2010 2:01:20 AM   
hertz


Posts: 1315
Joined: 8/7/2010
Status: offline
At first, I struggled to find the connection between this story and politics. But now I get it. At times, we all allow our patriotism to blind us to the reality that we can't be the best in the world at everything.

Harley have done a wonderful job of repositioning themselves into the fashion market so that they could continue to sell their product. In the UK, we utterly failed to do this, and tens, literally, tens of historic motorcycle companies fell when faced with the superior Japanese technology: BSA, Royal Enfield, Norton, Velocette, Ariel, AJS - it's a long, long list. All credit to Harley for making a success of their business.

But it's crazy to think that Harley is serious competition outside the fashion market. It simply isn't. You can rest assured though that if I ever decided, in a moment of madness, that I wanted to pose and cruise around town, I'd pick Harley over any of the Japanese fashion models. And that's Harley's greatest success. It has the market in poser machines absolutely sewn up. No-one else comes anywhere near.

(in reply to RapierFugue)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: So what will the purists call this these... lentil ... - 11/12/2010 2:09:41 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
Harley is a poser machine? Perhaps. But its an expensive machine to pose with.

From a female perspective, there is nothing like having a lion between sweet thighs... keep the whining crotch rockets to yourselves, give me something that roars!

< Message edited by tazzygirl -- 11/12/2010 2:10:05 AM >


_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to hertz)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: So what will the purists call this these... lentil ... - 11/12/2010 4:49:41 AM   
dreamysubmale


Posts: 204
Joined: 4/7/2007
Status: offline
Born to be wild






Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Everywhere man blames nature and fate, yet his fate is mostly but the echo of his character and passions, his mistakes and weaknesses... Democritus

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: So what will the purists call this these... lentil ... - 11/12/2010 5:19:15 AM   
RapierFugue


Posts: 4740
Joined: 3/16/2006
From: London, England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Harley is a poser machine? Perhaps. But its an expensive machine to pose with.

From a female perspective, there is nothing like having a lion between sweet thighs... keep the whining crotch rockets to yourselves, give me something that roars!


An ex used to call Harleys "whoopee cushions", on account of the noise. She much preferred riding on the back of Japanese sports bikes (thankfully), on account of the performance (which, if you've never ridden one, is simply staggering, and very, very exciting). But yes, girls (and non-bike enthusiasts too, I’ve noticed) seem to love Harleys. I'd also say that a big sports bike "roars" much more than a "put-put", but that's personal preference on my part.

As I said; nothing wrong with a bit of relaxed riding or posing. An ex-racer mate of mine bought one because, on sports bikes, he was forever getting nicked for speeding (the concept of riding anything at less than flat-out was an alien concept to him), and after a while his license was in danger of going bye-bye. So he bought a Harley, which he described as “harder work to ride at 50 mph than your sports bike is at 150”, and was very happy. I’ve ridden several Harleys over the years. The V-Rod is the only one that's even halfway modern in feel, but is still more than 100 Kg heavier than it needs to be for riding in bends.

The Japanese sports 400s Hertz was talking about (CBR, VFR, RVF, GSXR, ZXR, etc) are the polar opposite; they’re tiny, ultra lightweight (the later ones at least), and they handle unbelievably well, as well as hitting 130 mph (assuming they're not Japanese market restricted to 112 mph). They also sort of teach you to ride well, because if you don’t judge the gears perfectly you don't go anywhere; unlike a litrebike you can’t just throw them at a corner in any gear and rely on the power to maintain progress. The RVF and ZXR are my faves; tiny, perfectly made recreations of bigger sports machines. And as to speed; the last time the 400 class was run at the Isle Of Man (in 2004, and bear in mind the TT course is a very fast course, where horsepower counts for more than handling) the litrebikes were averaging 124 mph, but the tiny 400s were still managing to average 110 mph. Over a 37 mile lap. Amazing.

Going back to the original post, I can’t see this working well for Harley; if there's one thing even their fans dislike about them, it’s the abysmal build quality. They've made good strides in improving over recent years, but they're still behind the Japanese (obviously) and even the Italians (less obviously) in build quality and reliability. Given the reputation Indian workers have for doing a less than decent job (a friend owns an Enfield Bullet, and you’d be hard pressed to find a worse-made bike, except maybe the modern Chinese machines), I can’t help thinking that it’s going to end up damaging their reputation, not to mention the fact that the American market plays very heavily on “buy made in America” and not “machined in America, then screwed together by people on slave wages”.

On the other hand, if Nike and the rest can get away with doing it with trainers and other goods, maybe Harley can market their way out of the problem. But with Harley doing ok financially (although they’re not making the money on selling bikes, but instead are propped up by their merchandising, finance deals, and made profit this year from closing Buell down, and selling off the MV Agusta brand), it does smack of profiteering over customer service and quality. Time will tell.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: So what will the purists call this these... lentil burners??? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.609