|
Nslavu -> RE: What is a gentleman? (11/16/2010 1:07:33 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: pahunkboy
Nsl, it sounds like they are saying then privileged. or other then common. that the flip side would be common man.
and yet- it is not Lord, Duke, or a title per se.
Funny huh? All encompassing so as to not exclude any derivation of title/privilege whether it be duke, king, queen, regent, lord. And the connotation of 'common' is set to low or average, not be confused with titled.
The title's seem meaningless now, except to them.That is really 'their' method of order amongst themselves. And those words won't likely go away. Especially, Lord. That one is huge in religion and one of the highest order of all that keeps the hierarchy in place. "Without the lord your god ... guess what happens" .. well you know your bible fear tactics I'm sure. Insert chaos.
In that century, they saw the writing on the wall. The unpopularity of Royalty (remember all the rebellions in history to overthrow Monarchies) demanded they adapt. They began handing government over because they realized they could control things at arms length (the guise of equality in this case) and now they even further distance themselves, so they are not blamed. Out of the line of fire so to speak. Now the common man takes the brunt of their own stupidity in governing themselves. Mastery if you ask me. All their presets/laws/inclusions were and still are in place and the command structure has evolved. Common man still reveres the Brit royal family and that helps to keep the illusion in place as if we are indeed distinguished by our genes.
Not much has changed in 5600 years, the Wizard is just behind a curtain now knowing that you don't need to be popular, much less adored and treated as king when you already possess the kingdom. Then you insert eugenics and who by virtue of money is first to afford the tech. Thy kingdom come, thy will be done. I love that Constantine bible shit!
|
|
|
|
