Aylee
Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: rulemylife quote:
ORIGINAL: Aylee quote:
ORIGINAL: rulemylife Which is the type of backwards logic that brought us golden shower economics. "If only we make things easier for the wealthy they will bestow on us their abundance". No, I was specifically refering to what was happening in the early part of the 20th century. Not backwards logic, but history. Well, I looked back at the earlier post and did not see where you were specifically referring to that. But more to the point, how does what happened in the early part of the 20th century have any bearing on what is happening now? I have a respect for history and understand that history often repeats itself, but I don't see the connection you are trying to make. I went and actually looked it up so that I had the correct administrations. Woodrow Wilson pushed for the reduction in income tax. It did not work. Warren G. Harding was elected. He did get through the lower income taxes. What happened next was that the government actually collected MORE revenue. Table 5 Federal Income Tax Revenue by Income Class, 1921 and 1926 Revenue Collecteda Percent of Total Income Class 1921 1926 1921 1926 Less than $10,000 155.1 32.5 22.5 4.6 $10,000 - $25,000 121.8 70.3 17.6 9.9 $25,000 - $50,000 108.3 109.4 15.7 15.4 $50,000 - $100,000 111.1 136.6 16.1 19.2 Over $100,000 194.0 361.5 28.1 50.9 Total 690.2 710.2 100.0 100.0 Source: James Gwartney and Richard Stroup, "Tax Cuts: Who Shoulders the Burden?" Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Economic Review, March 1982, p. 25. aMillions of constant 1929 dollars. So anyways the point is that if we increase the tax percent on the very wealthy, they will find ways of sheltering their money. So tax revenue will actually go down. Actually you can look at California in the last 40 years or so and see what would happen on a larger scale.
< Message edited by Aylee -- 11/20/2010 8:52:25 PM >
_____________________________
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.
|