NeedToUseYou
Posts: 2297
Joined: 12/24/2005 From: None of your business Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: caitlyn quote:
ORIGINAL: NeedToUseYou Ummmm, So, you want to open the borders to anyone and everyone without restriction. Ok, you realize that would drag the average US worker down to third world wages? And you are still for it? Not understanding how this helps anyone except the corporations, as they'd get cheap labor, but average guys loses opportunity. Exactly how again, why would this drag the average worker down to third world wages? Considering that these people wouldn't even be in competition for the same jobs, I'm not sure I make that connection at all. As a matter of fact, I would make te exact oposite argument. If American businnes had a pool a pool of cheap labor, they could stay at home. They would need managers for these people. They would have a wealth of skilled jobs needed to support these businesses. They would need IT systems. The poster above, blackpearl81, probably wouldn't have had to wait three years to get a job in the IT field, because there would be a wealth of businesses right here at home, with a ton of IT needs. The answer to the economic woes of the nation, is growth. Growth in areas where we are just being destroyed right now, because we have such a limited pool of cheap labor. Just my opinion. I feel that the people trying to "protect" the jobs of the American worker, are actually costing the American worker a chance at a better job, with better opportunity. Well, I guess our assumptions are different. My assumption was and is if they weren't illegal they'd pursue better jobs, and the corporations not currently using the cheap illegal labor would use the plentiful new cheap legal labor, I would anyway, that would work for much less. My assumption also was if it was just a open door policy to immigration we'd have even more immigration than current levels all viaing for the unskilled jobs lower wages further. A huge section of the public is employed in unskilled labor. So, I concluded, if you have increased immigrants, with no hiring restrictions, it would bottom out the unskilled labor market. Which is virtually every manufacturing job I'm aware of. At least in the three factories I worked in there are about 6 unskilled jobs to skilled job(generally a machine tech). And in a factory full of unskilled spanish speaking employees your management would need to speak spanish fluently so those floor level management jobs wouldn't go to the average american either. I think it would be a great advantage for skilled people, but would leave the rest making as much as the immigrants. I'm sure it would cause a boom in the stock market as well, along with many new manufacturing jobs. But it would take a large transition period as factories don't tool up and becoming functional overnight. But it still doesn't entirely solve the reasons why manufacturers go overseas, alot of that has to do with environmental standards, as in they don't much care how much pollution you dump, and also it's cheaper because you don't have to invest in expensive equipment that protects your workers from injury and dangerous fumes. Expensive Workers Compensation isn't a factor in third world countries either. I'm not arguing that something doesn't need to be done, but I think just opening up the floodgates to immigration isn't the answer either. And is only a partial solution, that puts the entire burden on wages as the reason for the failed US manufacturing system. My personal view is a controlled flow of immigration, that doesn't drown the labor market in a flood of new labor would be the best for all portions of the US population. As this would allow a controlled influx in proportion to the expected increase in labor jobs as factories are retooled or built. Neither view though addresses the other reasons manufactures go overseas.
|