|
Aneirin -> RE: Homosexuality As Population Control? (12/6/2010 5:20:14 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Moonhead
quote:
ORIGINAL: VioletGray
quote:
ORIGINAL: Moonhead
If that was the case, wouldn't the percentage of homosexuals expand with the population instead of staying pretty stable between 9 and 12 percent however overpopulated a cesspool somewhere becomes?
I'm pretty terrible at math, but I know that if the overall population is expanding, and homosexuals are maintaining a steady percentage of the population, then by definition they are expanding with the population.
As Ron says: if they're expanding as a form of population control, then the percentage of homosexuals in the population should be rising, rather than just pacing the rise. If the same amount per capita are gay, however many capita there are, then it obviously isn't any kind of population control, is it?
The trouble is no one knows the true numbers of gay people and that for various reasons, those that hide within traditional relationships, even spawn children to keep their desires hidden, all because of social and pseudo religious stigma, just look at the countries where gay men are executed, yet they still exist. If we cannot get an accurate census of the actual people in the world, we will not get an accurate census of the number of gay people either, that is if those polled choose to admit.
Perhaps of it was not for the gay bashing religions, population control might have been augmented earlier, if homosexuality is indeed a natural method of population control.
But if homosexuality it is by nature's design as population control and that population has thwarted nature's design by making up laws to prevent homosexuality, then what would be the next method considered ? Infertility perchance ?
But if infertility, the population is starting to thwart that, then, what is next, illness, disease, war, climate change ?
If it is accepted that mankind manages the enviroment, then it should also be accepted nature manages the human species.
|
|
|
|
