He Has a Point (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Humor and Games



Message


MasterG2kTR -> He Has a Point (12/3/2010 6:35:34 PM)

He Has a Point

Ahhh....the wisdom of age.....2 minutes long - make sure you watch it to the end




MrKicia -> RE: He Has a Point (12/3/2010 9:19:50 PM)

I disagree.  When I see phonetic writing I see ignorance. 




CarlisleDom -> RE: He Has a Point (12/4/2010 12:30:43 AM)

When I started to learn Spanish I was struck at how easy the spelling was.  The entire language is phonetic.  Because of that experience I often thought of how dumb (dum) English spelling is.  




zenny -> RE: He Has a Point (12/4/2010 12:52:36 AM)

Japanese is very phonetic. And if you don't know what you're saying (or was said) then you still won't be able to write it. Every language has sounds and rules. If you lessen those sounds/rules then you lose complexity and standardization. When you lose those you lose the ability to make nuanced distinctions or exchange thoughts and diminish overall communication. So no, he doesn't have a point.




GreedyTop -> RE: He Has a Point (12/4/2010 1:05:39 AM)

gah.. totally misread things..

I find phonetic spellings to make more sense that throwing in extra letters for no obvious reason.  To me, those added letters are more 'ignorant' than not.  It smacks of pomposity, IMO.




zenny -> RE: He Has a Point (12/4/2010 1:13:00 AM)

It's all about how many sounds a language can produce. More sounds in general = better. If one thinks about it you either have repetition of letters or you have more symbols. Take your pick. Those different letter arrangements make the distinction between sounds and thus words. Without them we don't have the variety of language that some people enjoy. Without this variety exchange of ideas becomes difficult and you either have to make longer words or add even more meanings to existing words. In short, using one rule to misconstrue another is not an argument for "this is dumb and should be changed"




GreedyTop -> RE: He Has a Point (12/4/2010 3:52:16 AM)

words like the ones used in the video would benefit from being phonetically spelled, IMO.

Tuff
ruff
faze
sed
laff

are just some of the words I think would better off without the extra letters.  reading them, it's easy to understand what words they are, neh?




MrKicia -> RE: He Has a Point (12/4/2010 5:52:55 AM)

tough
rough
phase
said
laugh

I still agree with zenny.




allnewtome -> RE: He Has a Point (12/4/2010 5:58:38 AM)

Or you could just text talk. The younger generation would love it. They seem to be all about doing things the easy way eg opening tins, instead of real cooking, using a calculator in maths tests etc etc


Now I feel old [8|]




GreedyTop -> RE: He Has a Point (12/4/2010 8:30:59 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrKicia

tough
rough
phase
said
laugh

I still agree with zenny.



and I still do not understand why the extra letters are better than the phonetic?




MasterG2kTR -> RE: He Has a Point (12/4/2010 11:53:14 AM)

Ok, for all the humorless nit-pickers.....you totally missed the point! First of all....this is the HUMOR forum (or do you just click on anything you see not knowing where you are headed?). Second, what I found best about this (which is actually a very old skit that Gallagher used to do in his act) was the fact that the old man doing it was 102 (something I told you to watch for) and he pulled it off very well. Finally, you have no business viewing the HUMOR forum posts if you don't know how to LAFF!!!




MrKicia -> RE: He Has a Point (12/4/2010 8:05:21 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreedyTop

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrKicia

tough
rough
phase
said
laugh

I still agree with zenny.



and I still do not understand why the extra letters are better than the phonetic?


quote:

ORIGINAL: zenny

It's all about how many sounds a language can produce. More sounds in general = better. If one thinks about it you either have repetition of letters or you have more symbols. Take your pick. Those different letter arrangements make the distinction between sounds and thus words. Without them we don't have the variety of language that some people enjoy. Without this variety exchange of ideas becomes difficult and you either have to make longer words or add even more meanings to existing words. In short, using one rule to misconstrue another is not an argument for "this is dumb and should be changed"





MrKicia -> RE: He Has a Point (12/4/2010 8:09:24 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterG2kTR

Ok, for all the humorless nit-pickers.....you totally missed the point! First of all....this is the HUMOR forum (or do you just click on anything you see not knowing where you are headed?). Second, what I found best about this (which is actually a very old skit that Gallagher used to do in his act) was the fact that the old man doing it was 102 (something I told you to watch for) and he pulled it off very well. Finally, you have no business viewing the HUMOR forum posts if you don't know how to LAFF!!!



It was a neat skit.  Nothing I would call funny.  I think its great at 102 he is able to get through something like that relatively quickly without any problems.  My great grand mother is 100 and is starting to have issues with the "easy" stuff.




Elisabella -> RE: He Has a Point (12/5/2010 2:52:55 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: zenny

Japanese is very phonetic. And if you don't know what you're saying (or was said) then you still won't be able to write it. Every language has sounds and rules. If you lessen those sounds/rules then you lose complexity and standardization. When you lose those you lose the ability to make nuanced distinctions or exchange thoughts and diminish overall communication. So no, he doesn't have a point.


The thing is, English doesn't have standard sounds and rules - that's what the video is pointing out.

If you compare to Spanish - Spanish vowels are standardized - a="ah" e="eh" i="ee" o="oh" u="oo" and that's the end of it. Dipthongs are standardized in Spanish as well.

Where is the nuance between "colonel" and "kernel"? The words are pronounced the same...no nuanced distinction.

You say every language has sounds and rules - what is the standard English rule for the sound "a" makes? Is there one?

Why does the same symbol represent different sounds in "cat," "father," and "ache"?

Why is the same sound represented by different symbols in "eye," "ice," "why," "buy" and "kaiser"?

What is the symbol for the 'long i' sound - is it ey, i, y, uy, or ai? And how does that relate to hey, snip, yes, soliloquy, and said?

From a linguistics perspective, there is no standard spelling or standard symbol/sound relationship in English.




PyrotheClown -> RE: He Has a Point (12/5/2010 10:26:23 AM)

But, alota people spell come as cum




Termyn8or -> RE: He Has a Point (12/5/2010 8:03:08 PM)

FR

Ten years ago I would not be welcome here because I could not express myself all that well. Maybe fifteen. Something like that.

Lacking a typist and wanting to write things impelled me to learn. Necessity is indeed the Mother of invention.

When you read words, the spelling gives an inkling to their origin(s) and as such their meaning(s). They could whap me in the head all they want in school, but until I had the desire to express myself via the written word I had no need for grammar and punctuation. seeing the world in a larger sense, I figured the language out, learned, because I wanted to, and really there was no other reason.

I am a bit on the old side to learn other languages, and there is valid reason to do so. Spanish and the Oriental languages would be good to know, and today some Arabic languages, but I am stuck in the mold. Actually this forum among others have impelled me to learn the language, simply because I want to express my opinion.

I talk to DPs all the time. Some say English is the easiest language, others disagree strongly. Even having known people who avoid using slang because they have moved around the country so much has added something. When forced by this means, you learn. You also learn that English has it's limitations. There are twelve tenses in Polish, but the word tense in that sense means something else. Grammar is different. In another language you might say "Outside go, with shoes". This means put your shoes on before you go outside.

And of course spelling is a similar mess. Even English is bad enough. Color vs colour, flavor vs flavour. But friend is friend in German. It's just pronounced "fru[e]nd". Something like that. I have always liked German, I consider it one of the most versatile languages around, even though I understand very little of it. Maybe not in self expression like a novel or something, but in technical terms they can speak a paragraph in one word. Some words are forty letters, and are constructed "along the way" so to speak. We call something a "tri-cellular conbustion chamber" [in a cylinder of an internal combustion engine] and they have a very precise forty three letter word to describe it. Like doctors and researchers who are sometimes called upon to actually invent a word, it comes natural to them.

Rhyming is another story. Falco did Der Kommisar, which was translated to English. How exactly they did it I don't know because the grammar is a bit different and the words, let's not even talk about it. But they got it done. Translating a rhyme that must fit a musical construct has got to be a real bitch.

Sometimes spelling can be explained away by looking at the roots of the words, however in the example given, that doesn't really apply. Interjections and such are not always noted and published. In fact I made one up - "ISH". That means shut the fuck up.

Another fucked up thing about English, at least our version of it is how many acronyms become words. Changes happen so fast. ROM is a word ? Nope. Phone is not a word, just a component of a word. Telephone is a word based on the language, and it is just as improper to use the word phone discretely as it is to use the "word" tele. But we don't see it that way so it is not so.

I swear that guy sounds like one of my English teachers, but i can't really be sure because I didn't pay attention. But then I had a blind algebra teacher.

The modus of communication is fluid, unfortunately that means all those words etched in stone mean nothing. So here we are.

T




AquaticSub -> RE: He Has a Point (12/5/2010 8:05:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreedyTop

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrKicia

tough
rough
phase
said
laugh

I still agree with zenny.



and I still do not understand why the extra letters are better than the phonetic?


I don't really get it myself but I do agree that standardization is required for effective written communication. If memory serves correctly Ben Franklin was pushing for something like this but it didn't go through.




Termyn8or -> RE: He Has a Point (12/6/2010 12:18:36 AM)

Before that Aq, we came within one vote of sprechen ze doitch.

T




zenny -> RE: He Has a Point (12/8/2010 10:30:00 PM)

To OP:

I originally just read the posts, title, and viewed the clip. Having entered this thread via the wheel I didn't notice it being in the humor section and frankly "He has a point" adds a note of seriousness.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella


quote:

ORIGINAL: zenny

Japanese is very phonetic. And if you don't know what you're saying (or was said) then you still won't be able to write it. Every language has sounds and rules. If you lessen those sounds/rules then you lose complexity and standardization. When you lose those you lose the ability to make nuanced distinctions or exchange thoughts and diminish overall communication. So no, he doesn't have a point.


The thing is, English doesn't have standard sounds and rules - that's what the video is pointing out.

If you compare to Spanish - Spanish vowels are standardized - a="ah" e="eh" i="ee" o="oh" u="oo" and that's the end of it. Dipthongs are standardized in Spanish as well.

Where is the nuance between "colonel" and "kernel"? The words are pronounced the same...no nuanced distinction.

You say every language has sounds and rules - what is the standard English rule for the sound "a" makes? Is there one?

Why does the same symbol represent different sounds in "cat," "father," and "ache"?

Why is the same sound represented by different symbols in "eye," "ice," "why," "buy" and "kaiser"?

What is the symbol for the 'long i' sound - is it ey, i, y, uy, or ai? And how does that relate to hey, snip, yes, soliloquy, and said?

From a linguistics perspective, there is no standard spelling or standard symbol/sound relationship in English.


I had intented to just message you in response as I'm just revisiting this thread but find I cannot. While I don't have a degree in linguistics I will attempt to impart my knowledge and understandings to you as you have asked the questions (albeit probably rhetorically).

First and foremost written languages spawned when the need to keep records comes about. As such, symbols are imagined or stolen from other sources and then various sounds are attached to them (this is the standard). The sounds that are used are situational and as explained before so are the spellings. They change when a distinction needs to be drawn; for whatever reason.

If, as you say, linguistics recognizes no standard symbol/sound relationship it's because they're not looking at it from the beginning. That is to say that when a written language is put forth or even evolves it is with a standard symbol/sound relationship. It is are not formulaic. It simply is; it is tautological. This also extends to regional differences.

Technically speaking colonel and kernel are not pronounced the same. Looking in a dictionary would show this. Often times it is difficult to hear the difference and most people don't enunciate anyway (which is part of the problem).

Examining both the history and formation of the written Sioux and Japanese languages shows this. Frankly, I bet examining the history of written Spanish would show this as well.




AquaticSub -> RE: He Has a Point (12/8/2010 10:30:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

Before that Aq, we came within one vote of sprechen ze doitch.

T


Interesting!




Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875