CreativeDominant
Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DesFIP It doesn't work for me. I prefer a win/win solution where we solve the problem. Punishment is the least effective way of changing things. In fact, I will go so far as to say that it is a mark of a lazy dominant. It takes a lot more work to teach someone to succeed than it does to order them to do something and punish them for not knowing how. Or for not having explained something and expecting them to be a mind reader. I am going to disagree with this on several levels, Des. First, I don't agree that punishment is the least effecftive way of changing things. It may well be the least effective way for YOU...but it has already been stated that it is effective for others. Second. The mark of a lazy dominant? Or the mark of someone who doesn't like being challenged by one who has agreed to yield? There are infinite ways for a submissive to earn punishment...as infinite as the variety of D/s dynamics out there. Myself...like Focus, I don't like to punish either. I prefer discipline and there is a difference between the two. Discipline is used to correct a problem that no matter how many times it is gone through in discussion and explained to the submissive, it continues to occur. Now then, many say that this COULD be the sign of something deeper. Yes, it could... a sign of dissatisfaction within the relationship for some reason, etc.. But, if that is NOT what has come out of the discussion...if what has come out is that the submissive felt lazy that day or the submissive did not want to yield to something for no good reason that she can offer, then discipline is in order. Some might see discipline as punishment. I don't. I see discipline as analyzing the problem, utilizing some sort of tools to make the submissive aware of why her way of doing things disrupted the relationship and focus on the fact that she agreed I was in charge and that she CHOSE to agree to yield. It is not always pleasant but it HAS been effective. Punishment...as I have noted before...generally tends to be for things much more severe and potentially destructive to the dynamic, if not the relationship. Because it is reserved for those areas, it is used very judiciously and ONLY after much, MUCH communication has taken place. Because of the discipline...and as Focus said, a punishment dynamic in place...I do consider those D/s relationships I've entered into as having a punishment dynamic. Of the 4 I've had, all were such. Ironically enough, it was the one where it was least in place where I had the most trouble. However, I would quickly point out that it was not the sole cause of problems within the dynamic lest anyone think that I am saying that not having it was the major problem. Third: It takes more work to teach someone to succeed and do things right. Yeah...it can. Especially when the submissive is of the nature where yielding is not all that easy for her, even when the relationship is solid and has been in place for awhile. There ARE differing levels of submission and I understand that. But for me, a dynamic in which the dominant has to fear/wonder/be uncertain whether or not this instance of exerting control will be another time when the submissive bucks and threatens to walk away can come about not only/not just because he is not a good teacher or because he is not patient BUT because she is not a good student and is unwilling...not at that time or not all the time but in that instance...to yield and has nothing to dread (for lack of a better word) because there are no consequences...other than the dominant's displeasure/hurt/anger which has been rendered impotent by those same lack of consequences. I am not saying that allllllllll submissives in a non-punishment dynamic are this way. I am stating that some are. And it does not always indicate a lack of proper dominance by the dominant in question. I too prefer a win-win solution...with compromise and a newly-reached level of togetherness. But it just doesn't always happen that way. quote:
I just read a post on another site where the sub was punished for anticipatory service when the dom had never told her not to do it. That's wrong. If he couldn't be bothered to tell her never to make a suggestion or try to be helpful, that's his fault when she didn't know it. He just punished her, he never explained what she should do in the future. ;/quote]I agree. If a dominant has not made himself clear, then his choice to punish is a cover-up of his own culpability. quote:
Nor is punishment an excuse for breaking hard limits, which is also seen a lot. Heartily agree. But that is not what is being spoken of here, is it? Or did I miss something? quote:
Over the years, the problems we've had where he mainly could have punished have been always due to miscommunication. He didn't explain fully or my understanding of what he said was entirely different than what he used by the term. He asked me during the baseball playoffs to look up when his team was playing. I responded that it was dark that night, meaning a Broadway term referring to no performance. He got upset believing it was blacked out in our area. Should I have been punished for not understanding what he meant? Not punished. I would ask if the Man was used to using Broadway terms to describe other things besides sports. Why not just say when they were playing? But it certainly isn't a thing where I see punishment OR discipline as being in order. quote:
The other thing that he could sometimes punish me for is for being short tempered. However, invariably I get that way because I'm thirsty, hungry or overtired. Should I be punished for him not stopping for lunch? Punished because my blood sugar dropped? Not in my book. Here we keep an eye on the time and now schedule in breaks so that this won't happen. If you have scheduled in breaks so that it doesn't happen...as you have both seen the unpleasantness that results. So, if those breaks are scheduled...and you have said that you would follow them, then why does it happen? Not yielding on your part or just a human mistake? In a dynamic with me...Again, no punishment would be called for. Communication about why it happened would be. Discipline if the reason why was due to a reason that could be seen as deliberate...i.e., making something more important than the consequences of disrupting us.
|