RE: Pascal's Wager (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


lickenforyou -> RE: Pascal's Wager (12/26/2010 1:23:22 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

You do realize that many psychologists believe that relying solely upon rational thought... if thats at all possible... has just as many problems as someone relying completely upon emotions. Your assertion that rational thought process is best is flawed.


No, I don't realize that at all. I think that most psychologist and psychiatrist try to help patients learn to use reason to reach logical decisions in their lives. Of course there are people who need help getting in touch with and understanding their feelings. Understanding one's emotions is essential for mental and physical health.

You say that my assertion that rational thought process is best is flawed, but you have to show me where it is flawed.




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Pascal's Wager (12/26/2010 1:42:35 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: lickenforyou

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

You do realize that many psychologists believe that relying solely upon rational thought... if thats at all possible... has just as many problems as someone relying completely upon emotions. Your assertion that rational thought process is best is flawed.


No, I don't realize that at all. I think that most psychologist and psychiatrist try to help patients learn to use reason to reach logical decisions in their lives. Of course there are people who need help getting in touch with and understanding their feelings. Understanding one's emotions is essential for mental and physical health.

You say that my assertion that rational thought process is best is flawed, but you have to show me where it is flawed.



You do realize that Tazzygirl NEVER relies on rational thought?




tazzygirl -> RE: Pascal's Wager (12/26/2010 10:30:19 PM)

And you only say that after being proven wrong on other threads. [:D]




tazzygirl -> RE: Pascal's Wager (12/26/2010 10:50:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: lickenforyou

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

You do realize that many psychologists believe that relying solely upon rational thought... if thats at all possible... has just as many problems as someone relying completely upon emotions. Your assertion that rational thought process is best is flawed.


No, I don't realize that at all. I think that most psychologist and psychiatrist try to help patients learn to use reason to reach logical decisions in their lives. Of course there are people who need help getting in touch with and understanding their feelings. Understanding one's emotions is essential for mental and physical health.

You say that my assertion that rational thought process is best is flawed, but you have to show me where it is flawed.



In reference to the bolded part,.. didnt you say .......

quote:

It’s also my observation that people who rely on emotions more than logic to make decisions tend to make poor decisions.


Now, keep that in mind.

We make many decisions, and sometimes we are more or less logical about them. And it is arguable that all decision are, ultimately emotional.

Logical vs. emotional decision-making
Decision-making is a cognitive process where the outcome is a choice between alternatives. We often have different preferences as to our preferred, approach, varying between thinking and feeling.

Logical decision-making
When we use logic to make decisions, we seek to exclude emotions, using only rational methods, and perhaps even mathematical tools. The foundation of such decisions is the principle of utility, whereby the value of each option is assessed by assigning criteria (often weighted).

Emotional decision-making
There is a whole range of decision-making that uses emotion, depending on the degree of logic that is included in the process.

A totally emotional decision is typically very fast. This is because it takes time (at least 0.1 seconds) for the rational cortex to get going. This is the reactive (and largely subconscious) decision-making that you encounter in heated arguments or when faced with immediate danger.

Common emotional decisions may use some logic, but the main driving force is emotion, which either overrides logic or uses a pseudo-logic to support emotional choices (this is extremely common).

Another common use of emotion in decision is to start with logic and then use emotion in the final choice.

Damasio's research
Neuroscientist Antonio Damasio studied people who had received brain injuries that had had one specific effect: to damage that part of the brain where emotions are generated. In all other respects they seemed normal - they just lost the ability to feel emotions.

The interesting thing he found was that their ability to make decisions was seriously impaired. They could logically describe what they should be doing, in practice they found it very difficult to make decisions about where to live, what to eat, etc.

In particular, many decisions have pros and cons on both sides. Shall I have the fish or the beef? With no rational way to decide, they were unable to make the decision.

The point of decision
Always emotional decision?
So at the point of decision, emotions are very important for choosing. In fact even with what we believe are logical decisions, the very point of choice is arguably always based on emotion.

We talk about decisions that feel or seem right. When logical decisions are wrong, we will often feel that this is so. Emotions are perhaps signals from the subconscious that tell us a lot about what we really choose.

Subconscious in charge?
An even stranger factor is research where the subject's brain was wired up to recorders and the subject was asked to simply press a red button at any time. The notion was that if the conscious mind was in charge, then that part of the brain would be seen to change first, an if the decision started in the subconscious, then electrical activity in that part of the brain would work first.

And the answer was...that the subconscious started activity first. The shocking conclusion is that the subconscious is in charge of the bus, and that we are living an illusion of conscious choice. As emotions also stem from the subconscious, then this makes it even more likely that decisions have a strong emotional influence.


http://changingminds.org/explanations/emotions/emotion_decision.htm




Kirata -> RE: Pascal's Wager (12/26/2010 11:31:42 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: lickenforyou

I thinks it’s pretty obvious that an angry face with the word HAPPY on it would cause an emotional conflict. Which was what the researchers were trying to do.

Well, you're entitled to your opinion. But I'll stay with mine.

The researchers assumed that the dissonant images would create an emotional conflict, but in fact they didn't. The fMRI scans showed that when subjects viewed the non-dissonant images, the parts of their brains that process emotions were activated as expected. But when they were presented with the assumed-to-be emotionally dissonant images, it snoozed. This shows that they responded with little or no emotion to those images, and therefore could not have been experiencing an "emotional conflict". All the researchers actually "discovered" is a processing conflict called The Stroop Effect, which has nothing to do with emotion.

In response to your first question, I don't know offhand of any studies comparing the emotional impact of colors versus faces, but I would be inclined to agree that the effect would likely be stronger with faces. As to "What are feelings?" I'm reminded of an old cliche:

"A feeling is something you have; an emotion is something that has you." [:D]

K.




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Pascal's Wager (12/27/2010 10:39:34 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

And you only say that after being proven wrong on other threads. [:D]


Not by you, ever.




tazzygirl -> RE: Pascal's Wager (12/27/2010 11:40:50 AM)

go eat another banana.

You lost the argument with health care.

Now you come here to pout.

Learn to lose graciously or i will keep pointing these things out.




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Pascal's Wager (12/27/2010 12:19:36 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

You lost the argument with health care.



Stop eating mushrooms, your hallucinations are getting the best of you




tazzygirl -> RE: Pascal's Wager (12/27/2010 12:28:52 PM)

Mushrooms... poor choice since im allergic. Keep eating bananas, you may, eventually, gain some intelligence




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Pascal's Wager (12/27/2010 12:30:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Mushrooms... poor choice since im allergic. Keep eating bananas, you may, eventually, gain some intelligence


Ahhh, allergic to mushrooms and logical thought.

Keep eating crow with your lame claims of victory that have no basis in reality. At least it keeps you from making yet another vacuous argument.




tazzygirl -> RE: Pascal's Wager (12/27/2010 12:34:54 PM)

Your debating skills have been reduced to "bullshit" and "wrong". Some posters wont even respond to you. You declare people to have no knowledge of subjects, then backpedal when proven wrong. Then you run to other threads to toss out trashy comments at posters without adding a single thing to the debate.

Exactly why are you here?




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Pascal's Wager (12/27/2010 12:39:56 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Your debating skills have been reduced to "bullshit" and "wrong". Some posters wont even respond to you. You declare people to have no knowledge of subjects, then backpedal when proven wrong. Then you run to other threads to toss out trashy comments at posters without adding a single thing to the debate.

Exactly why are you here?


im here to expose people like you who dont have a clue about anything they post about. Those who wont respond to me CANT respond to me because they know they are wrong. You only respond with snark because you have no game.




tazzygirl -> RE: Pascal's Wager (12/27/2010 12:41:00 PM)

I dont need game. I have intelligence on what i speak about. And an ability to research. Unlike yourself.




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Pascal's Wager (12/27/2010 12:43:57 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

I dont need game. I have intelligence on what i speak about. And an ability to research. Unlike yourself.


Intelligence rofl. You dont have a logical synapse in your head and logic is the basis of intelligence. Most things I post about I deal with every fucking day of my life, I dont need the mental masturbation of posting links that you dont understand and that you think constitutes "research".




tazzygirl -> RE: Pascal's Wager (12/27/2010 12:48:47 PM)

And now you just proved yourself a liar. Sorta knew you would. [;)]

quote:

My experience in the field was as a health care consultant and claims auditor. And you arent stupid, so you can only be disingenous buy pretending that we arent talking about the RATE of at risk pregancies (and there are hundreds of links that discuss the higher rate of at risk pregnancies in the US).


http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3508930

As far as your "experience", you are a trained monkey for the insurance company you work for. Trained to say exactly what they want you to say to keep that paycheck coming. Heaven forbid you actually discover some truth behind the rhetoric you slobber over.




lickenforyou -> RE: Pascal's Wager (12/27/2010 4:43:48 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: lickenforyou

I thinks it’s pretty obvious that an angry face with the word HAPPY on it would cause an emotional conflict. Which was what the researchers were trying to do.

Well, you're entitled to your opinion. But I'll stay with mine.

The researchers assumed that the dissonant images would create an emotional conflict, but in fact they didn't. The fMRI scans showed that when subjects viewed the non-dissonant images, the parts of their brains that process emotions were activated as expected. But when they were presented with the assumed-to-be emotionally dissonant images, it snoozed. This shows that they responded with little or no emotion to those images, and therefore could not have been experiencing an "emotional conflict". All the researchers actually "discovered" is a processing conflict called The Stroop Effect, which has nothing to do with emotion.

In response to your first question, I don't know offhand of any studies comparing the emotional impact of colors versus faces, but I would be inclined to agree that the effect would likely be stronger with faces. As to "What are feelings?" I'm reminded of an old cliche:

K.



That's a valid point. The MRIs didn't show that the emotional part of the brain shut down because of an emotional conflict or if the logic part kicked in because there was conflicting information. As I said I didn't use the study to prove I'm right, just that there is that line of thinking out there.

I'm fine with a stalemate. I think the unanswered question, for me, is kind of the chicken and the egg, at this point. Can the decision not be made OR can the action not be taken until we feel good about it.

and, "A feeling is something you have; an emotion is something that has you." is just a good general rule. Old cliches stick around for a reason.




lickenforyou -> RE: Pascal's Wager (12/27/2010 4:53:01 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: lickenforyou

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

You do realize that many psychologists believe that relying solely upon rational thought... if thats at all possible... has just as many problems as someone relying completely upon emotions. Your assertion that rational thought process is best is flawed.


No, I don't realize that at all. I think that most psychologist and psychiatrist try to help patients learn to use reason to reach logical decisions in their lives. Of course there are people who need help getting in touch with and understanding their feelings. Understanding one's emotions is essential for mental and physical health.

You say that my assertion that rational thought process is best is flawed, but you have to show me where it is flawed.



In reference to the bolded part,.. didnt you say .......

quote:

It’s also my observation that people who rely on emotions more than logic to make decisions tend to make poor decisions.


Now, keep that in mind.

We make many decisions, and sometimes we are more or less logical about them. And it is arguable that all decision are, ultimately emotional.

Logical vs. emotional decision-making
Decision-making is a cognitive process where the outcome is a choice between alternatives. We often have different preferences as to our preferred, approach, varying between thinking and feeling.

Logical decision-making
When we use logic to make decisions, we seek to exclude emotions, using only rational methods, and perhaps even mathematical tools. The foundation of such decisions is the principle of utility, whereby the value of each option is assessed by assigning criteria (often weighted).

Emotional decision-making
There is a whole range of decision-making that uses emotion, depending on the degree of logic that is included in the process.

A totally emotional decision is typically very fast. This is because it takes time (at least 0.1 seconds) for the rational cortex to get going. This is the reactive (and largely subconscious) decision-making that you encounter in heated arguments or when faced with immediate danger.

Common emotional decisions may use some logic, but the main driving force is emotion, which either overrides logic or uses a pseudo-logic to support emotional choices (this is extremely common).

Another common use of emotion in decision is to start with logic and then use emotion in the final choice.

Damasio's research
Neuroscientist Antonio Damasio studied people who had received brain injuries that had had one specific effect: to damage that part of the brain where emotions are generated. In all other respects they seemed normal - they just lost the ability to feel emotions.

The interesting thing he found was that their ability to make decisions was seriously impaired. They could logically describe what they should be doing, in practice they found it very difficult to make decisions about where to live, what to eat, etc.

In particular, many decisions have pros and cons on both sides. Shall I have the fish or the beef? With no rational way to decide, they were unable to make the decision.

The point of decision
Always emotional decision?
So at the point of decision, emotions are very important for choosing. In fact even with what we believe are logical decisions, the very point of choice is arguably always based on emotion.

We talk about decisions that feel or seem right. When logical decisions are wrong, we will often feel that this is so. Emotions are perhaps signals from the subconscious that tell us a lot about what we really choose.

Subconscious in charge?
An even stranger factor is research where the subject's brain was wired up to recorders and the subject was asked to simply press a red button at any time. The notion was that if the conscious mind was in charge, then that part of the brain would be seen to change first, an if the decision started in the subconscious, then electrical activity in that part of the brain would work first.

And the answer was...that the subconscious started activity first. The shocking conclusion is that the subconscious is in charge of the bus, and that we are living an illusion of conscious choice. As emotions also stem from the subconscious, then this makes it even more likely that decisions have a strong emotional influence.


http://changingminds.org/explanations/emotions/emotion_decision.htm


You've posted way too much here for me to respond to. When I first started posting on these boards I would respond point by point to someone's posted study. Only to have them not respond or only respond to something that was a minor point for me. Or, worse yet, post another study for me to respond to.

If you would pull one or two bullet points from the study that backs up your POV and then post the link to the study I'd be happy to continue the discussion.

I do love to debate but I have to leave some time to masturbate, uh, I mean work.




Kirata -> RE: Pascal's Wager (12/27/2010 5:22:30 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: lickenforyou

I'm fine with a stalemate...

A stalemate? You view this as being like a chess game? A battle of strategies and tactics?

Did you choose that metaphor on the basis of some line of reasoning, or did it just feel right to you?

K.




lickenforyou -> RE: Pascal's Wager (12/27/2010 8:44:04 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: lickenforyou

I'm fine with a stalemate...

A stalemate? You view this as being like a chess game? A battle of strategies and tactics?

Did you choose that metaphor on the basis of some line of reasoning, or did it just feel right to you?

K.



stale·mate  (st[image]http://img.tfd.com/hm/GIF/amacr.gif[/image]l[image]http://img.tfd.com/hm/GIF/prime.gif[/image]m[image]http://img.tfd.com/hm/GIF/amacr.gif[/image]t[image]http://img.tfd.com/hm/GIF/lprime.gif[/image])n.1. A situation in which further action is blocked; a deadlock.

- the action in this case being the discussion.

And, I don't remember saying that I used just logic for every decisions, did I?





Kirata -> RE: Pascal's Wager (12/27/2010 8:53:22 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: lickenforyou

And, I don't remember saying that I used just logic for every decisions, did I?

Goodness no, it's obvious you don't. [:D]

K.




Page: <<   < prev  4 5 6 [7] 8   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875