RCdc -> RE: Can a submissive be trained to be dominant? (1/8/2011 2:40:36 PM)
|
quote:
how is that necessarily poor management? maybe they are simply being honest? =p not every s-type does have the ability to top. if they are honest and admit that, rather than being dishonest and trying to force it, i see nothing wrong there. =p slaves have limitations, and simply having a Master doesn't get rid of them. =p poor management is shoving someone to do something that s/he really can't do. good management is realizing strengths and weaknesses -- capitalizing on the strengths and seeing what weaknesses can be overcome. not every weakness can. Because they haven't tried, not because they aren't honest. I'm talking about the dominants who don't have the ability to inspire their charge into at least trying, and automatically dismiss it because 'they don't have the gene'. If everything was genetic, we wouldn't have a gorgeous photograph of you in those fabulous lashes, ya dig? Denying anyone the chance based purely on the fact that they couldn't possibly have the gene without even letting them try it once, is poor management. I'm not suggesting force, but inspiration. Of course, a dominant might just not want a sub that can work a flogger, and that's different[;)] quote:
then following that, someone who DOES top and doesn't enjoy it but smiles anyway, you tell them they are lying by omission. =p so do they do it even if they don't enjoy it, but at least try to make it seem like they do, or do they just not do it? can't have it both ways. =p haha Or the third option. Be honest with the fact that you hate it, don't hide the fact (like trying to make it seem like they do) and instead suffer and do it. Obeying isn't about doing what you want, but what you signed up for. Geeze, everyone wants stuff easy...[;)] joking aside, that is why there is such a high fail rate in relationships and divorce/seperation is on the up.
|
|
|
|