Freedom of Speech (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


ScaryJello -> Freedom of Speech (1/16/2011 11:41:38 AM)

So you are upset because the moderators decided not to interfere with a person expressing their opinion and freedom of speech?

The freedom of speech isn't there to protect the popular opinions. It isn't there to protect what the majority of people believe, for such things need no protection. No it is there to protect unpopular opinions. Too many people forget that there is no right to not be offended. If you see that someone has posted something that offends you then act your age and simply ignore it. Leave them to their opinion.

I may not like what they say but I will defend to the death their right to say it.

Maybe I am one of the few people left who believe this.




gungadin09 -> RE: Freedom of Speech (1/16/2011 12:48:06 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ScaryJello

So you are upset because the moderators decided not to interfere with a person expressing their opinion and freedom of speech?

Actually, i'm not upset about anything right now. i'm just fooling around on the computer.

The freedom of speech isn't there to protect the popular opinions. It isn't there to protect what the majority of people believe, for such things need no protection. No it is there to protect unpopular opinions.

Technically, freedom of speech refers to the protection of citizens against their government. TOS refers to the protection of forum members against other forum members, regardless of who's popular or in the majority. The rules apply to everyone, although sometimes i doubt. Who do You think You need protection from?

Too many people forget that there is no right to not be offended.

Too many people forget that the internet is not some kind of jungle land where it's okay for a person to get their jollies by pissing in everyone else's face. There is not right not to be offended. There is a RULE against personal attacks, though, and posting inflamatory remarks just to goad people is discouraged.

If you see that someone has posted something that offends you then act your age and simply ignore it. Leave them to their opinion.

This is a forum. We COME here to debate. If we all kept silent every time we disagreed, this place would become very dull. By posting at all, You're assuming the risk that others will disagree with You. By the way- there is no "right to not be disagreed with" either.

I may not like what they say but I will defend to the death their right to say it.

So will i. Doesn't mean that i won't tell them when it's ridiculous, though.

Maybe I am one of the few people left who believe this.

Then live by those words. Everyone has the right to give their opinions here. And You defend that right. Right?


pam




Hillwilliam -> RE: Freedom of Speech (1/16/2011 1:03:26 PM)

Im glad someone figured out what that rant was about.




ScaryJello -> RE: Freedom of Speech (1/16/2011 1:10:18 PM)

Okay first off I have no idea who you are or what you were upset about. I posted this in response to a thread someone else posted with only their comment and no responses allowed.

I am well aware of what the freedom of speech actually applies to. I was referencing the freedom of speech towards the moderators actions in allowing the racist comments and not deleting them.

I need protection from none.

Seeing as I don't know what thread you are referring to with the personal attacks I can't make any comment on what happened. Discouraged is different from against the rules.

Except that the internet is a wild no mans land. It is up to moderators of individual places to set the rules. If they allow such posts then obviously pissing in peoples faces is allowed. And there are several places on the internet where such no holds barred atmospheres are encouraged.

Oh by all means tell them it is ridiculous if you feel it will do any good. In my experience attempting to correct racists is like trying to convince atheists or devout religious people to change their mind.

I do live by those words. Everyone is allowed to speak their mind.

The thread I saw was just the tipping point. I have seen many threads in my time on this site and others where unpopular opinions are simply pounced upon and devoured. Rather then ignoring things that offend them, people turn and attack. It is just saddening to see people refuse to act their age and instead simply rage against other opinions.




Real0ne -> RE: Freedom of Speech (1/16/2011 1:13:53 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

Im glad someone figured out what that rant was about.


why so condescending?






ModTwentyOne -> RE: Freedom of Speech (1/16/2011 1:24:34 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ScaryJello

I was referencing the freedom of speech towards the moderators actions in allowing the racist comments and not deleting them.



There is a difference between "allowing the racist comments" and "being unaware of the racist comments".  If it is not reported, we may not see it.  Further, when a report is made, there is a comment box.  Sometimes problems are not obvious, and typing in the comment box helps us to determine what the problem is.  For instance, if someone reports the statement "all men are inferior" and calls that "racist", then an explanation of why they think that is racist would help us resolve the report.







Hillwilliam -> RE: Freedom of Speech (1/16/2011 1:27:57 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

Im glad someone figured out what that rant was about.


why so condescending?




When I first appeared, I read it twice and couldn't figure out what it was in reference to. Most folks post on a thread they have a problem with instead of starting a new thread and making everyone try to read their minds as to what it is about.




AquaticSub -> RE: Freedom of Speech (1/16/2011 1:29:13 PM)

While I actually agree with you in general, you seem to have forgotten that freedom of speech really doesn't apply on here.

You see, our freedom of speech protects our right to say things. It doesn't give us the right to say whatever we want in any forum. Go check the ToS and you'll find a number of topics that we are not allowed to talk about on here.

Freedom of speech protects our ability to make our own forum where we can make the rules of discussion. CM does have rules about what you can and can't talk about and that is perfectly in line with our rights. That you happen to agree without the mods latest decision not to pull posts has nothing to do with anything.

There are banned topics here and that does not infringe on freedom of speech. I'm getting really tired of people thinking it translates into "anything, anywhere". You can't shout fire in a crowded theatre and you have to respect the 'host rules', be it a classroom, debate, or forum. All have rules.




gungadin09 -> RE: Freedom of Speech (1/16/2011 2:01:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ScaryJello

Okay first off I have no idea who you are or what you were upset about. I posted this in response to a thread someone else posted with only their comment and no responses allowed.

i'm not upset, actually. i have no idea who You are either or what thread You were referring to in Your OP. i wasn't trying to attack You personally, or offend You, but rather to make the most sensible reply i could to what seemed like a bunch of grandstanding with very little point to it. i have no idea what You're raving on about *specifically*, so i answered in generalised terms. I offered the same answer that i usually give to posts like this: Of course a person has the right to speak their minds. Just like every other person does.

I am well aware of what the freedom of speech actually applies to. I was referencing the freedom of speech towards the moderators actions in allowing the racist comments and not deleting them.

i still don't understand You. Are You criticising the moderators actions, or supporting them? Maybe You had better start at the beginning.

I need protection from none.

Then You wrote a very vague and confusing OP, and i'm not sure it's my fault that i misunderstood.

Seeing as I don't know what thread you are referring to with the personal attacks I can't make any comment on what happened. Discouraged is different from against the rules.

It's difficult to answer You more specifically either, because i don't know what thread YOU'RE talking about. However, when posts get pulled from a thread it's generally because of personal attacks or, less frequently, because a poster started talking about something that is forbidden by TOS. If they do not get pulled, then it's because the moderators do NOT consider them personal attacks or any other violation of TOS. (edited to add: or they haven't seen them yet.)

Except that the internet is a wild no mans land. It is up to moderators of individual places to set the rules. If they allow such posts then obviously pissing in peoples faces is allowed. And there are several places on the internet where such no holds barred atmospheres are encouraged.

Okay, i think i understand You now, and You are criticising the moderators for not pulling a post/posts from another thread because they were racist. Or are You criticising the posters on that thread for not accepting the mods decision as final, in terms of what stays and what goes?

Oh by all means tell them it is ridiculous if you feel it will do any good. In my experience attempting to correct racists is like trying to convince atheists or devout religious people to change their mind.

Are You criticising racists? Or the people who try to talk them out of their views?

I do live by those words. Everyone is allowed to speak their mind.

And yet You ask people to act their age and ignore offensive posts. Quietly leave others to their opinions.

The thread I saw was just the tipping point. I have seen many threads in my time on this site and others where unpopular opinions are simply pounced upon and devoured. Rather then ignoring things that offend them, people turn and attack. It is just saddening to see people refuse to act their age and instead simply rage against other opinions.

It saddens me too, and i try not to attack people, regardless of how unpopular their views are. i would much rather have a conversation that start trading insults with people. However, this is a forum. People come here to debate and trade ideas. Some people are more polite at it than others. Some people are downright rude. (Which is NOT a violation of TOS). Why not take Your own advice and ignore the things that offend You? Or, at very least, write about them more coherently?

The danger of writing a thread so poorly is that it leaves so much up to interpretation. For God's sake, word Your thread more clearly next time. i'm STILL not sure what Your point is!


pam




Louve00 -> RE: Freedom of Speech (1/16/2011 2:28:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ScaryJello

So you are upset because the moderators decided not to interfere with a person expressing their opinion and freedom of speech?

The freedom of speech isn't there to protect the popular opinions. It isn't there to protect what the majority of people believe, for such things need no protection. No it is there to protect unpopular opinions. Too many people forget that there is no right to not be offended. If you see that someone has posted something that offends you then act your age and simply ignore it. Leave them to their opinion.

I may not like what they say but I will defend to the death their right to say it.


Maybe I am one of the few people left who believe this.


So, you want people to ignore someone's opinion and not make comment on it, if they are compelled to comment on something posted on a public forum board.  They can comment, but their comment can't be commented on?  First of all a forum board is loaded with discussion and opinion.  And comments.....happen.  Second of all, why would it be ok for person A to air his opinions freely and person B must act his age, ignore it, and restrain himself by not passing comment back?  It is my opinion that would be a very "one-sided" debate.

(now, are you going to defend my right to comment to the death?)




Real0ne -> RE: Freedom of Speech (1/16/2011 2:32:35 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

Im glad someone figured out what that rant was about.


why so condescending?




When I first appeared, I read it twice and couldn't figure out what it was in reference to. Most folks post on a thread they have a problem with instead of starting a new thread and making everyone try to read their minds as to what it is about.


you labeled it a rant, trying to veil it now is a bit late




Hillwilliam -> RE: Freedom of Speech (1/16/2011 2:54:52 PM)

I labelled it a rant because I saw and STILL see it as a rant. It is a rant with no obvious rhyme or reason.




CerVeza -> RE: Freedom of Speech (1/16/2011 2:56:39 PM)

Free speech is only speech that is compassionate, serves the people, and is pre approved by the democrat national committee. Everything else is hate speech promoted by sarah palin. Every clear headed American knows that.




LadyPact -> RE: Freedom of Speech (1/16/2011 7:28:50 PM)

In My opinion, the Freedom of Speech rhetoric isn't appropriate for this venue.

The site isn't a democracy.  While the site does extend certain courtesies and privileges, it really is their domain.  We're really just guests here.  Just like having guests in My home, My guests have to abide by My rules while they are here.  I don't see this site as anything different.

None of us has a right to be here.  We're permitted to be here.  We don't have a right to do whatever we think we should be allowed to do because we're under some kind of misconception that we have some kind of entitlement.  If that means some comments are pulled or some comments are left to remain, that's completely up to those who have authority here. 




angelikaJ -> RE: Freedom of Speech (1/16/2011 7:41:14 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ScaryJello

So you are upset because the moderators decided not to interfere with a person expressing their opinion and freedom of speech?

The freedom of speech isn't there to protect the popular opinions. It isn't there to protect what the majority of people believe, for such things need no protection. No it is there to protect unpopular opinions. Too many people forget that there is no right to not be offended. If you see that someone has posted something that offends you then act your age and simply ignore it. Leave them to their opinion.

I may not like what they say but I will defend to the death their right to say it.

Maybe I am one of the few people left who believe this.


Their house; their rules.

They determine where the line is and what crosses it.
Generally speaking, when all else fails read the directions.
(Usually misunderstandings can be avoided if that is done first, but many people seem to think it's more fun to read them later.)

There is a lot of leeway here.
Avoiding personal attacks and name calling; staying on topic and usually you have a lot of freedom to express your opinions, popular or not.




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875