|
xssve -> RE: Explaining BDSM (1/24/2011 7:11:26 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DesFIP
quote:
ORIGINAL: xssve
John has been around longer than I have, longer than you, longer than anybody I'm pretty sure - no, I don't know him personally, but you can get to know him through his posts and the books he's written, and he's anything but a stuffed shirt.
If he was being absolutely serious, it qualifies as an opinion, nothing else, so no reason to get your knickers in a bind, we're all entitled to at least one.
Many many vanillas apparently feel far superior to me and do not hesitate to make their opinion known to me in no uncertain terms - I say they don't know what they're missing.
Except for those who've tried it an disliked it. Lots of vanillas out there who have done just that for their spouses and decided it isn't them. And that they want to be able to lie there in the dark on occasion, half asleep, and have their spouse roll on top of them, and have gentle lovemaking.
And if you're unable to enjoy that and need every single time to be a production with ropes and chains and hours carved out, well then I say you don't know what you're missing.
And yes John is allowed his opinion, which is all it is, not gospel truth. And several of us have different opinions of his post than yours - to wit, we found his comment offensive, which was no better than the guy he said it to, who was equally offensive. Tit for tat doesn't build bridges, it just reinforces walls.
It might be offensive to vegetarians I suppose, but again, I don't really see how calling it their loss is "offensive", calling them morons would be offensive.
I'm well aware there are those who don't have the stomach or the inclination for wiiwd - but that's their loss. [;)]
I think you both might be a little aspie: the context was clearly a bantering tone, not a lecturing one, thus, kidding.
|
|
|
|
