Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

AT&T asks top court to recognize its ‘personal privacy’


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> AT&T asks top court to recognize its ‘personal privacy’ Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
AT&T asks top court to recognize its ‘personal privac... - 1/19/2011 6:12:58 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline 		AT&T asks top court to recognize its ‘personal privacy’

How dumb.   Corporations have "personal privacy"?

That is a stretch.
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: AT&T asks top court to recognize its ‘personal pr... - 1/19/2011 6:55:23 PM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline 		While they sell our phone numbers, bank info, medical history all over the world.

Life is fair, let me in, oops, forget it.

T^T

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: AT&T asks top court to recognize its ‘personal pr... - 1/19/2011 6:57:53 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline 		Chuckles.   Good point.  

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: AT&T asks top court to recognize its ‘personal pr... - 1/20/2011 2:47:44 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline 		Its a novel defense relying on ambiguities in the FOIA, but will ultimately fail. Corporate law is already very clear on what constitutes protected trade secrets and intellectual property.

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: AT&T asks top court to recognize its ‘personal pr... - 1/20/2011 3:50:49 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

Its a novel defense relying on ambiguities in the FOIA, but will ultimately fail. Corporate law is already very clear on what constitutes protected trade secrets and intellectual property.


I disagree.  If the data reflected that standard- then it so would have been stated.

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 5
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> AT&T asks top court to recognize its ‘personal privacy’ Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.063